20 Pennsylvania opinions name it 6 courts 1840–2023 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Baumann v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2023Although WCJ Young did not reference the Lewis standard or make a specific finding that Claimant’s condition changed since the 2019 WCJ Decision was issued, “by accepting [] [E]mployer’s medical evidence of [Claimant’s] full recovery as credible, [] WCJ [Young] [] properly ma[d]e a finding that [] [E]mployer [] met the standard set forth in Lewis [of] a change in Claimant’s condition.” Baumann, 147 A.3d at 1291 (quoting Del. 2023Although WCJ Young did not reference the Lewis standard or make a specific finding that Claimant’s condition changed since the 2019 WCJ Decision was issued, “by accepting [] [E]mployer’s medical evidence of [Claimant’s] full recovery as credible, [] WCJ [Young] [] properly ma[d]e a finding that [] [E]mployer [] met the standard set forth in Lewis [of] a change in Claimant’s condition.” Baumann, 147 A.3d at 1291 (quoting Del. | 1 | 3 |
Darrow, M. v. PPL Electric Utilities Corp.green2 sentences2023See Darrow v. PPL Electric Utilities Corp., 266 A.3d 1105 , 1111 (Pa. Super. 2021). 2023See Darrow v. PPL Electric Utilities Corp., 266 A.3d 1105 , 1111 (Pa. Super. 2021). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Elliottgreen2 sentences2021(Id.) See also Commonwealth v. Elliott, 622 Pa. 236, 294 , 80 A.3d 415, 450 (2013), cert. denied, 574 U.S. 828 , 135 S.Ct. 50 , 190 L.Ed.2d 54 (2014) (stating “no number of failed ineffectiveness claims may collectively warrant relief if they fail to do so ____________________________________________ 3 We do not adopt Judge Lewis’s analysis of Appellant’s claim of ineffectiveness for failing to impeach an eyewitness. 2021(Id.) See also Commonwealth v. Elliott, 622 Pa. 236, 294 , 80 A.3d 415, 450 (2013), cert. denied, 574 U.S. 828 , 135 S.Ct. 50 , 190 L.Ed.2d 54 (2014) (stating “no number of failed ineffectiveness claims may collectively warrant relief if they fail to do so ____________________________________________ 3 We do not adopt Judge Lewis’s analysis of Appellant’s claim of ineffectiveness for failing to impeach an eyewitness. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Colongreen1 sentence2020See generally Commonwealth v. Colon, 102 A.3d 1033, 1043 (Pa. Super. 2014) (concluding that an “[a]ppellant’s claim that the trial court sentenced him to a term of total confinement based solely on a technical violation raises a substantial question for our review.”). | 1 | 1 |
Interiors v. Wall of Fame Management Co.green2 sentences2004Franklin Interiors v. Wall of Fame Management Co. Inc., 510 Pa. 597, 601 , 511 A.2d 761, 762 (1986) (noting if a condition precedent to a contract is unsatisfied, no binding contract exists). 2004Franklin Interiors v. Wall of Fame Management Co. Inc., 510 Pa. 597, 601 , 511 A.2d 761, 762 (1986) (noting if a condition precedent to a contract is unsatisfied, no binding contract exists). | 1 | 1 |
Sprague v. Waltergreen2 sentences2003Similarly, claims of ill will, even if substantiated (which Lewis’s claim is not) offer only scant persuasive value of “actual malice.” See Sprague, 656 A.2d at 907 (“[Ejvidence of ill will or bad motives will support a finding of actual malice only when combined with other, more substantial evidence of bad faith.”). ¶ 17 Although we recognize further that various pieces of circumstantial evidence, when considered together, may combine to raise the inference of fault required by the “actual malice” standard, see id. at 907, we cannot conclude that such a combination is present on this record. 2003Similarly, claims of ill will, even if substantiated (which Lewis’s claim is not) offer only scant persuasive value of “actual malice.” See Sprague, 656 A.2d at 907 (“[Ejvidence of ill will or bad motives will support a finding of actual malice only when combined with other, more substantial evidence of bad faith.”). ¶ 17 Although we recognize further that various pieces of circumstantial evidence, when considered together, may combine to raise the inference of fault required by the “actual malice” standard, see id. at 907, we cannot conclude that such a combination is present on this record. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Delaware County v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
green
2 sentences2023Cnty., 964 A.2d at 35 ) (emphasis omitted). 2023Cnty., 964 A.2d at 35 ) (emphasis omitted). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Com. v. Muhammed, Y.
green
1 sentence2021Lewis’ issue on appeal is controlled by our Court’s decision, Commonwealth v. Muhammed, 219 A.3d 1207 (Pa. Super. 2019). | 1 | 2021–2021 |
McCuthison v. Tenn. Dep't of Human Servs.
green
1 sentence2021(Id.) See also Commonwealth v. Elliott, 622 Pa. 236, 294 , 80 A.3d 415, 450 (2013), cert. denied, 574 U.S. 828 , 135 S.Ct. 50 , 190 L.Ed.2d 54 (2014) (stating “no number of failed ineffectiveness claims may collectively warrant relief if they fail to do so ____________________________________________ 3 We do not adopt Judge Lewis’s analysis of Appellant’s claim of ineffectiveness for failing to impeach an eyewitness. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Provitt v. Pennsylvania
green
1 sentence2021(Id.) See also Commonwealth v. Elliott, 622 Pa. 236, 294 , 80 A.3d 415, 450 (2013), cert. denied, 574 U.S. 828 , 135 S.Ct. 50 , 190 L.Ed.2d 54 (2014) (stating “no number of failed ineffectiveness claims may collectively warrant relief if they fail to do so ____________________________________________ 3 We do not adopt Judge Lewis’s analysis of Appellant’s claim of ineffectiveness for failing to impeach an eyewitness. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Commonwealth v. Roane
green
1 sentence2018Roane, supra; Williams, supra. Therefore, his first claim on appeal is meritless. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Williams
green
1 sentence2018Roane, supra; Williams, supra. Therefore, his first claim on appeal is meritless. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Morris
green
1 sentence2018Commonwealth v. Morris , 958 A.2d 569 , 578-579 (Pa. Super. 2008) (internal citations and quotation marks omitted). *789 Lewis's claim relies solely on the Act. 1 The Legislature amended the Controlled Substance, Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act by enacting the Drug Overdose Response Immunity statute. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Commonwealth v. Goldsborough
green
1 sentence2017Goldsborough, supra. Officer Contreras’ entry in Lewis’ apartment was illegal, Bowmaster, supra, and therefore we affirm the court’s order granting Lewis’ motion to suppress. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Commonwealth v. Bowmaster
green
1 sentence2017Goldsborough, supra. Officer Contreras’ entry in Lewis’ apartment was illegal, Bowmaster, supra, and therefore we affirm the court’s order granting Lewis’ motion to suppress. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
G. Simmons v. WCAB (Powertrack International)
green
1 sentence2016Simmons, 96 A.3d at 1149 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Terry v. Ohio
green
2 sentences2010Terry v Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). . 2010Terry v Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968). . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
United States v. Bajakajian
green
2 sentences2001In Lewis’ brief to this Court in 5444 Spruce Street I, Lewis states in her Summary of Argument, The civil forfeiture of Ms. Lewis' home is an unconstitutional Excessive Fine under United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 336-37 , 118 S.Ct. 2028 , 141 L.Ed.2d 314 (1998). 2001In Lewis’ brief to this Court in 5444 Spruce Street I, Lewis states in her Summary of Argument, The civil forfeiture of Ms. Lewis' home is an unconstitutional Excessive Fine under United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 336-37 , 118 S.Ct. 2028 , 141 L.Ed.2d 314 (1998). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Commonwealth v. Myers
green
2 sentences1998Courts may permit a defendant to withdraw his or her plea of guilty after sentence has been imposed only where the defendant makes “a showing of prejudice that results in a manifest injustice.” Commonwealth v. Myers, 434 Pa.Super. 221, 225 , 642 A.2d 1103 , 1104 *503 (1994). 1998Courts may permit a defendant to withdraw his or her plea of guilty after sentence has been imposed only where the defendant makes “a showing of prejudice that results in a manifest injustice.” Commonwealth v. Myers, 434 Pa.Super. 221, 225 , 642 A.2d 1103 , 1104 *503 (1994). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
COM., DEPT. OF TRANSP. v. Miller
neutral
1 sentence1994However, we recently retreated from our holding in Conrad and returned to a Selan/Lewis analysis in Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing v. Miller, 155 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 564, 625 A.2d 755 (1993). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Martin v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences1986Using the rational basis test in economic legislation challenges, as we must, id., we simply do not believe that claimant has met the burden of proving that the Law as interpreted violates equal protection. 1986Using the rational basis test in economic legislation challenges, as we must, id., we simply do not believe that claimant has met the burden of proving that the Law as interpreted violates equal protection. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Commonwealth v. Corbin
green
1 sentence1982The most recent expression of the law concerning the license and privilege aspect of burglary is Com. v. Corbin, 300 Pa. Super. 224 , 446 A. 2d 308 (1982). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Commonwealth v. Reed
green
1 sentence1982The most recent expression of the law concerning the license and privilege aspect of burglary is Com. v. Corbin, 300 Pa. Super. 224 , 446 A. 2d 308 (1982). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Overfield v. Christie
green
1 sentence1840The case of Overfield v. Christie, 7 Serg. & Rawle 173 -7, had put the decision, or rather the law, as laid down in Potts v. Gilbert, clearly out of the way as to a great part of it. | 1 | 1840–1840 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.