Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Howard v. Howardgreen2 sentences1986See Howard v. Howard, 409 So.2d 279 (La.App. 4th Cir.1981). 1986See Howard v. Howard, 409 So.2d 279 (La.App. 4th Cir.1981). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Wellsgreen1 sentence2012See State v. Wells, 2008-2262, p. 5 (La.7/6/10), 45 So.3d 577, 581 ; see State v. Pham, supra. Because the trial-court judge properly applied the legal doctrines governing the *158 invocation of the exclusionary rule to un-contradicted facts, we conclude that she did not abuse her discretion by denying Mr. Lewis’ motion to suppress the evidence. | 1 | 1 |
Davis v. Farm Fresh Food Suppliergreen1 sentence2011See Davis, 879 So.2d at 221 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mimsgreen1 sentence2010Here, since Lewis’ motion for reconsideration merely alleged that the sentence is excessive, she is “simply relegated to having the appellate court | ..¡consider the bare claim of excessiveness.” State v. Mims, 619 So.2d 1059, 1060 (La.1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Castleberry
green
1 sentence2026Pursuant to Castleberry, 758 So.2d 749 , Mr. Lewis’s cumulative error argument has no merit. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Cure v. Department of Police
green
1 sentence2018We now consider the primary argument set forth in Lewis' brief: that the CSC "failed to find/state that [Lewis] was already eligible to be transferred back to her former place of employment and instead chose to suspend me while not being present at work, 2 days later alleging that I posed a threat to an employee." As discussed herein, DHS had the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the complained-of infraction occurred, and that the infraction "bore a real and substantial relationship to the efficient operation of the appointing authority." Cure , 2007-0166 at p. 2, 964 S | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Luther v. Iom Co.
green
1 sentence2016Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to Mr. Lewis, as the nonmoving party, see Luther v. IOM Co. LLC, 13-0353, p. 5 (La.10/15/13), 130 So.3d 817, 822 , we find that defendants made a prima facie showing that there was an absence of factual support for an essential element of the legal malpractice claim. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Millon v. Clarion Hotel
neutral
1 sentence2010Lewis, supra at p. 4 , 816 So.2d at 909 ; Millon v. Clarion Hotel, 98-0002, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/16/98), 719 So.2d 568, 570 . 4 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Lewis v. River City Const.
green
1 sentence2010Lewis, supra at p. 4 , 816 So.2d at 909 ; Millon v. Clarion Hotel, 98-0002, p. 3 (La.App. 4 Cir. 9/16/98), 719 So.2d 568, 570 . 4 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Mayberry
green
1 sentence2009Mayberry, supra. As to Mr. Lewis’ claim he was denied an opportunity to elicit Brady and/or impeachment material from Officer Williams, a preliminary hearing does not abrogate or stand in the place of discovery articles, La. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Carter v. Salter
green
1 sentence1980In Carter v. Salter, supra, we stated: "Likewise, under the jurisprudence of this circuit, both Mrs. Carter and Mr. Carter are barred from recovering in their survival actions for Brent's pain and suffering by Mrs. Carter's negligence and its imputation to her husband. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.