Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1981–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Charles K. Moore v. State of Missourigreen1 sentence2015We are compelled, under Moore v. State, 458 S.W.3d 822, 825 (Mo. banc 2015), to examine the issue of timeliness of Lewis’ motion for post-conviction relief. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Peeplesgreen1 sentence2012“The Missouri Supreme Court held in State v. Perry, 275 S.W.3d 237 (Mo. banc 2009) that Section 491.075 was both facially valid and constitutionally valid as applied to that defendant.” State v. Peeples, 288 S.W.3d 767, 774 (Mo.App.2009). | 1 | 1 |
Laubinger v. Laubingergreen1 sentence2001Because this court finds that Mr. Lewis’s challenge to the constitutionality of § 454.496 is merely colorable, see id., and that he has faded to properly raise his claim that other statutes were unconstitutional, Laubinger v. Laubinger, 5 S.W.3d 166, 173 (Mo.App.1999), this court has jurisdiction to decidé this case. | 1 | 1 |
Travis v. Kansas Citygreen1 sentence1996See id. at 524 . | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hendersongreen1 sentence1994The balancing of the effect and the value of uncharged crimes evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, Bernard, 849 S.W.2d at 13 , “which is.in the best position to evaluate whether the potential prejudice of relevant evidence outweighs the relevance.” State v. Henderson, 826 S.W.2d 371, 374 (Mo.App.1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lewisgreen2 sentences1989See Lewis, 633 S.W.2d at 114 ; Robbery in the Second Degree—Included and Related Offenses, The New Missouri Criminal Code: A Manual for Court Related Personnel, § 14.3 (1978). 1989See Lewis, 633 S.W.2d at 114 ; Robbery in the Second Degree—Included and Related Offenses, The New Missouri Criminal Code: A Manual for Court Related Personnel, § 14.3 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lewis v. Snow Creek, Inc.
green
2 sentences2007In contrast to the large-type "Rental Form" title, the exculpatory clause at the bottom was in approximately five-point type ( Id. ), which we illustrate by reducing the Lewis clause accordingly: 10. 2007In contrast to the large-type "Rental Form" title, the exculpatory clause at the bottom was in approximately five-point type ( Id. ), which we illustrate by reducing the Lewis clause accordingly: 10. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
State v. Perry
green
1 sentence2012“The Missouri Supreme Court held in State v. Perry, 275 S.W.3d 237 (Mo. banc 2009) that Section 491.075 was both facially valid and constitutionally valid as applied to that defendant.” State v. Peeples, 288 S.W.3d 767, 774 (Mo.App.2009). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Marriage of Chastain v. Chastain
green
1 sentence2001A similar challenge was raised and considered by the Missouri Supreme Court in Chastain, 932 S.W.2d at 398-99 , and the Court upheld the constitutionality of § 454.496. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Bernard
green
1 sentence1994The balancing of the effect and the value of uncharged crimes evidence rests within the sound discretion of the trial court, Bernard, 849 S.W.2d at 13 , “which is.in the best position to evaluate whether the potential prejudice of relevant evidence outweighs the relevance.” State v. Henderson, 826 S.W.2d 371, 374 (Mo.App.1992). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Rook v. John F. Oliver Trucking Company
green
1 sentence1981The Lewis’ challenge raises several issues but we do not deem it necessary to reach all issues raised as well as others inherent in the proceeding. 9 Rather, it is apparent that the judgment as to the Lewis’ runs afoul of the well-accepted rule that the relief granted upon default may not be “other or greater than that which he shall have demanded in the petition as originally filed and served on defendant ...” Sec. 511.160, RSMo 1978; Rule 74.11; Rook v. John F. Oliver Trucking Co., 505 S.W.2d 157 (Mo.App.1973). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.