6 District of Columbia opinions name it 1 courts 1980–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by District of Columbia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re WMgreen2 sentences2020See In re W.M., 851 A.2d at 449 n.22 (noting that the Lewis framework is appropriate for addressing challenges to executive action). 2020See In re W.M., 851 A.2d at 449 n.22 (noting that the Lewis framework is appropriate for addressing challenges to executive action). | 1 | 1 |
Coleman v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2015We reverse a trial court’s denial of motion for mistrial “only if it appears irrational, unreasonable, or so extreme that the failure to reverse would result in a miscarriage of justice.” Coleman v. United States, 779 A.2d 297, 302 (D.C.2001) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Keefe Co. v. Americable International, Inc.green1 sentence2007See Keefe Co. v. Americable Int’l, Inc., 755 A.2d 469, 475 (D.C.2000); see also 23 Williston on Contracts § 63:15 (4th ed. 2002) ("question whether a party has repudiated a contract is one of fact”). 10 . | 1 | 1 |
Jefferson v. OURISMAN CHEVROLET CO., INC.green2 sentences2001See Bernard, supra, 624 A.2d at 1219 (citing Jefferson, supra, 615 A.2d at 585 ). 2001See Bernard, supra, 624 A.2d at 1219 (citing Jefferson, supra, 615 A.2d at 585 ). | 1 | 1 |
Bernard v. Calkinsgreen2 sentences2001See Bernard, supra, 624 A.2d at 1219 (citing Jefferson, supra, 615 A.2d at 585 ). 2001See Bernard, supra, 624 A.2d at 1219 (citing Jefferson, supra, 615 A.2d at 585 ). | 1 | 1 |
Winters v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1991See Winters v. United States, 317 A.2d 530, 534 (D.C.1974) (en banc). [5] In this note, the jury also asked, "What is the definition of intent?" [6] In response to the jury's second note, counsel for appellant Lewis moved for a mistrial on the ground that the jury did not understand that the charge against his client was not distribution but possession with intent to distribute. 1991See Winters v. United States, 317 A.2d 530, 534 (D.C.1974) (en banc). . | 1 | 1 |
CITIZENS BLDG. & L. ASS'N OF MONTGOMERY CO. v. Shepardgreen1 sentence1980See Citizens Building & Loan Association of Montgomery County v. Shepard, supra; Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Hill, supra. Although we have concluded that Mrs. Lewis’ motion can qualify under the criteria of Super.Ct.Civ.R. 60(b)(1), the decision of whether to grant the motion is equitable in nature and other factors must be considered. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in District of Columbia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brady v. Maryland
green
2 sentences2015Butler and Lewis’s Asserted Brady Violations Butler and Lewis claim that the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motions for mistrial based on two asserted violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). 2015Butler and Lewis’s Asserted Brady Violations Butler and Lewis claim that the trial court abused its discretion by denying their motions for mistrial based on two asserted violations of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 , 83 S.Ct. 1194 , 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Hill
green
1 sentence1980See Citizens Building & Loan Association of Montgomery County v. Shepard, supra; Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Hill, supra. Although we have concluded that Mrs. Lewis’ motion can qualify under the criteria of Super.Ct.Civ.R. 60(b)(1), the decision of whether to grant the motion is equitable in nature and other factors must be considered. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.