Lewis factors (Kansas) · Go Syfert
← Kansas issues

Lewis factors in Kansas

6 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1995–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Keysgreen
kan · 2022 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024See State v. Keys, 315 Kan. 690 , 697, 510 P.3d 706 (2022).

11
State v. Lewisgreen
kan · 2014 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
2 sentences

2019App. 2d 394 , 405, 388 P.3d 194 (2017) ; see State v. Lewis , 299 Kan. 828 , 835, 326 P.3d 387 (2014) (listing eight "[f]actors to consider in determining if an interrogation is investigative or custodial").

2019App. 2d 394 , 405, 388 P.3d 194 (2017) ; see State v. Lewis , 299 Kan. 828 , 835, 326 P.3d 387 (2014) (listing eight "[f]actors to consider in determining if an interrogation is investigative or custodial").

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Donahue neutral
kan · 2019
1 sentence

2021State v. Donahue, 309 Kan. 265 , 267, 434 P.3d 230 (2019).

12021–2021
State v. Lewis neutral
kanctapp · 2008
1 sentence

2021State v. Lewis, No. 99,180, 2008 WL 4849677 (Kan.

12021–2021
State v. Guein green
kanctapp · 2017
2 sentences

2019In my view, the Court of Appeals correctly applied the Lewis factors and concluded that "this portion of the encounter was much like a traffic stop, ordinarily considered an investigatory detention not requiring Miranda warnings." State v. Guein , 53 Kan.

2019In my view, the Court of Appeals correctly applied the Lewis factors and concluded that "this portion of the encounter was much like a traffic stop, ordinarily considered an investigatory detention not requiring Miranda warnings." State v. Guein , 53 Kan.

12019–2019
Arizona v. Youngblood green
scotus · 1989
2 sentences

2015Analysis In Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 57 , 109 S. Ct. 333 , 102 L.

2015Analysis In Arizona v. Youngblood, 488 U.S. 51, 57 , 109 S. Ct. 333 , 102 L.

12015–2015
Lumley v. State green
kanctapp · 2001
1 sentence

2003After setting forth specific findings of fact, the district court ruled that Reed’s failure to consult or call an expert did not deprive Lewis of effective assistance of counsel, as the question of “[w]hether such an expert would be allowed to testify is not settled.” Because the district court held an evidentiary hearing on Lewis’ motion, filed pursuant to K.S.A. 60-1507, “[t]he standard of review ... is for the appellate court to determine whether the factual findings of the court are supported by substantial competent evidence and whether those findings are sufficient to support its conclus

12003–2003
State v. Richard green
kan · 1993
2 sentences

1995On appeal, Lewis complains that the sentencing judge “did not adequately consider the individual characteristics, circumstances, needs, and potentialities as they applied to Mr. Lewis (see K.S.A. 21-4601) nor the factors found in K.S.A. 21-4606.” He compares the circumstances in his case with those in State v. Richard, 252 Kan. 872 , 850 P.2d 844 (1993).

1995On appeal, Lewis complains that the sentencing judge “did not adequately consider the individual characteristics, circumstances, needs, and potentialities as they applied to Mr. Lewis (see K.S.A. 21-4601) nor the factors found in K.S.A. 21-4606.” He compares the circumstances in his case with those in State v. Richard, 252 Kan. 872 , 850 P.2d 844 (1993).

11995–1995

Where else courts name it

GA 41 (1977–2025) TX 28 (1967–2025) OH 25 (1996–2026) CA 22 (1906–2026) IN 21 (1982–2019) PA 20 (1840–2023) AL 19 (1983–2015) FL 14 (1986–2021) IL 14 (1980–2025) LA 11 (1980–2026) MO 9 (1981–2015) WA 9 (1978–2024) MT 9 (1988–2020) CO 8 (1994–2024) NY 8 (1983–2014) MN 8 (1996–2016) KS 6 (1995–2024) MI 6 (1970–2024) DC 6 (1980–2020) IA 5 (1982–2018) NV 5 (1980–2021) AZ 5 (2004–2023) TN 4 (2007–2009) AR 4 (2017–2023) MS 4 (2000–2013) HI 4 (1996–2021) SC 4 (1996–2016) KY 3 (2021–2025) WV 3 (2006–2026) MD 3 (1997–2017) CT 3 (1996–2014) MA 3 (2001–2025) DE 2 (1998–2017) ID 2 (1993–2022) VI 2 (2023–2024) WY 2 (1986–2025) UT 2 (2020–2024)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check