creditor claim in Texas

19 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1881–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Edward Nwokedi and 1002 Gemini Interests, LLC v. Unlimited Restoration Specialists, Inc.green texapp · 2014 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2024 2 sentences 2024Analysis To obtain relief under TUFTA, a plaintiff must prove: (1) that it is a creditor with a claim against (2) a debtor; (3) that the debtor transferred assets after, or a reasonable time before, the plaintiff’s claim arose; and (4) that the transfer was made with the intent to hinder, delay, or defraud the plaintiff creditor. 6 Nat’l Cleaners, LLC, 2022 WL 3973591 , at 4 (citing Nwokedi v. Unlimited Restoration Specialists, Inc., 428 S.W.3d 191 , 204–05 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2014, pet. denied)); see Tex. Bus. & Com. 2015*Id.	1	2
Bodine v. Webbgreen texapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024 2 sentences 2024Moreover, this document refers to a claim in rem, meaning an action “instituted directly against a thing, ... taken directly against property, or ... brought to enforce a right in the thing itself.” City of Conroe v. San Jacinto River Auth., 602 S.W.3d 444 , 457–58 (Tex. 2020) (quoting Bodine v. Webb, 992 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. denied)). “[A]n in rem judgment’s effect is limited only ‘to the property that supports jurisdiction.’” Id. at 458 (quoting Bodine, 992 S.W.3d at 676)). 2024Moreover, this document refers to a claim in rem, meaning an action “instituted directly against a thing, ... taken directly against property, or ... brought to enforce a right in the thing itself.” City of Conroe v. San Jacinto River Auth., 602 S.W.3d 444 , 457–58 (Tex. 2020) (quoting Bodine v. Webb, 992 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tex. App.—Austin 1999, pet. denied)). “[A]n in rem judgment’s effect is limited only ‘to the property that supports jurisdiction.’” Id. at 458 (quoting Bodine, 992 S.W.3d at 676)).	1	1
Crow-Southland Joint Venture No. 1 v. North Fort Worth Bankgreen texapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016“The security agreement defines the collateral to enable the debtor and other interested persons to identify the property that the creditor may claim as security.” Crow-Southland Joint Venture No. 1 v. N. Fort Worth Bank, 838 S.W.2d 720, 723-24 (Tex. App.-Dallas 1992, writ denied).	1	1
Bank One, Texas, N.A. v. Sunbelt Savings, F.S.B.green tex · 1992 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015Overton Bank & Trust, N.A. v. PaineWebber, Inc., 922 S.W.2d 311, 313 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ) (citing Bank One, Tex., N.A. v. Sunbelt Savings,F.S.B., 824 S.W.2d 557, 558 (Tex. 1992)).	1	1
Overton Bank & Trust, N.A. v. Painewebber, Inc.green texapp · 1996 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015Overton Bank & Trust, N.A. v. PaineWebber, Inc., 922 S.W.2d 311, 313 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no writ) (citing Bank One, Tex., N.A. v. Sunbelt Savings,F.S.B., 824 S.W.2d 557, 558 (Tex. 1992)).	1	1
Wygal v. Myersgreen tex · 1890 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Id.; see also Wygal v. Myers, 76 Tex. 598 , 13 S.W. 567, 568 (Tex.1890) (holding that “[w]hen the claim was duly established as a valid claim against the estate, the laws of limitation could no longer apply while the estate was being administered under the probate law.”) (emphasis added). 2012Id.; see also Wygal v. Myers, 76 Tex. 598 , 13 S.W. 567, 568 (Tex.1890) (holding that “[w]hen the claim was duly established as a valid claim against the estate, the laws of limitation could no longer apply while the estate was being administered under the probate law.”) (emphasis added).	1	1
Thorp Commercial Corporation v. Northgate Industries, Inc.green ca8 · 1981 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 2 sentences 1992Thorp Commercial Corp. v. Northgate Indus., Inc., 654 F.2d 1245 , 1248 (8th Cir.1981); Villa v. Alvarado State Bank, 611 S.W.2d 483, 486 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco 1981, no writ). 1992Thorp, 654 F.2d at 1248; Marine Drilling, 697 S.W.2d at 833 .	1	1
Villa v. Alvarado State Bankgreen texapp · 1981 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1992–1992 1 sentence 1992Thorp Commercial Corp. v. Northgate Indus., Inc., 654 F.2d 1245 , 1248 (8th Cir.1981); Villa v. Alvarado State Bank, 611 S.W.2d 483, 486 (Tex.Civ.App. — Waco 1981, no writ).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (19)

Case	Cited	Years
Nobles v. Marcus green tex · 1976 2 sentences 2010Id. § 24.006(a). 2010Id. § 24.006(a).	2	2010–2010
Stern v. Marshall green scotus · 2011 2 sentences 2016Stem held that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor when the claim is a “state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditor’s proof of claim in the bankruptcy.” 564 U.S. at 487 , 131 S.Ct. at 2611 . 2016Stem held that the bankruptcy court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over counterclaims asserted by the bankruptcy estate against a creditor when the claim is a “state law action independent of the federal bankruptcy law and not necessarily resolvable by a ruling on the creditor’s proof of claim in the bankruptcy.” 564 U.S. at 487 , 131 S.Ct. at 2611 .	1	2016–2016
Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Mayfield green tex · 1996 1 sentence 2002Id. ' 24.006. [11] This includes any alleged A transfer @ consisting of the refusal to pay FCLT = s debt claim. [12] It is well-settled that the estate of a decedent is not a legal entity and may not sue or be sued as such.	1	2002–2002
Marine Drilling Co. v. Hobbs Trailers green texapp · 1985 1 sentence 1992Thorp, 654 F.2d at 1248; Marine Drilling, 697 S.W.2d at 833 .	1	1992–1992
Ayres v. Henderson green tex · 1853 1 sentence 1966The limitation statute, now 5537, became a part of the law of Texas in 1841, and was explained in Ayres, Administrator, v. Henderson, 9 Tex. 539 , as having for its object the protection of domestic creditors, and when the return took place the creditor could claim the advantage intended by the section in suspending the operation of the statute.	1	1966–1966
Brown v. Fleming green texcommnapp · 1919 1 sentence 1951Brown v. Fleming, Tex.Com.App., 212 S.W. 483 .	1	1951–1951
Canon v. Stanley green texapp · 1936 1 sentence 1942Cain v. Bonner, 108 Tex. 399 , 194 S.W. 1098 , 3 A.L.R. 874 ; Coles v. Kelsey, 2 Tex. 541, 542 , 47 Am.Dec. 661; Cotulla v. Urbahn, 104 Tex. 208 , 126 S.W. 1108 , 135 S.W. 1159 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 345, Ann.Cas.1914B, 217; 28 Tex.Jur. 270, Sec. 174; McDonald v. Grey, 29 Tex. 80 ; Braddock v. Brockman, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W. 2d 811 ; Canon v. Stanley, Tex.Civ.App., 100 S.W.2d 377 .	1	1942–1942
Cotulla v. Urbahn green · 1911 2 sentences 1942Cain v. Bonner, 108 Tex. 399 , 194 S.W. 1098 , 3 A.L.R. 874 ; Coles v. Kelsey, 2 Tex. 541, 542 , 47 Am.Dec. 661; Cotulla v. Urbahn, 104 Tex. 208 , 126 S.W. 1108 , 135 S.W. 1159 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 345, Ann.Cas.1914B, 217; 28 Tex.Jur. 270, Sec. 174; McDonald v. Grey, 29 Tex. 80 ; Braddock v. Brockman, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W. 2d 811 ; Canon v. Stanley, Tex.Civ.App., 100 S.W.2d 377 . 1942Cain v. Bonner, 108 Tex. 399 , 194 S.W. 1098 , 3 A.L.R. 874 ; Coles v. Kelsey, 2 Tex. 541, 542 , 47 Am.Dec. 661; Cotulla v. Urbahn, 104 Tex. 208 , 126 S.W. 1108 , 135 S.W. 1159 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 345, Ann.Cas.1914B, 217; 28 Tex.Jur. 270, Sec. 174; McDonald v. Grey, 29 Tex. 80 ; Braddock v. Brockman, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W. 2d 811 ; Canon v. Stanley, Tex.Civ.App., 100 S.W.2d 377 .	1	1942–1942
Braddock v. Brockman neutral texapp · 1930 1 sentence 1942Cain v. Bonner, 108 Tex. 399 , 194 S.W. 1098 , 3 A.L.R. 874 ; Coles v. Kelsey, 2 Tex. 541, 542 , 47 Am.Dec. 661; Cotulla v. Urbahn, 104 Tex. 208 , 126 S.W. 1108 , 135 S.W. 1159 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 345, Ann.Cas.1914B, 217; 28 Tex.Jur. 270, Sec. 174; McDonald v. Grey, 29 Tex. 80 ; Braddock v. Brockman, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W. 2d 811 ; Canon v. Stanley, Tex.Civ.App., 100 S.W.2d 377 .	1	1942–1942
McDonald v. Grey green tex · 1867 1 sentence 1942Cain v. Bonner, 108 Tex. 399 , 194 S.W. 1098 , 3 A.L.R. 874 ; Coles v. Kelsey, 2 Tex. 541, 542 , 47 Am.Dec. 661; Cotulla v. Urbahn, 104 Tex. 208 , 126 S.W. 1108 , 135 S.W. 1159 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 345, Ann.Cas.1914B, 217; 28 Tex.Jur. 270, Sec. 174; McDonald v. Grey, 29 Tex. 80 ; Braddock v. Brockman, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W. 2d 811 ; Canon v. Stanley, Tex.Civ.App., 100 S.W.2d 377 .	1	1942–1942
Cain v. Bonner green · 1917 2 sentences 1942Cain v. Bonner, 108 Tex. 399 , 194 S.W. 1098 , 3 A.L.R. 874 ; Coles v. Kelsey, 2 Tex. 541, 542 , 47 Am.Dec. 661; Cotulla v. Urbahn, 104 Tex. 208 , 126 S.W. 1108 , 135 S.W. 1159 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 345, Ann.Cas.1914B, 217; 28 Tex.Jur. 270, Sec. 174; McDonald v. Grey, 29 Tex. 80 ; Braddock v. Brockman, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W. 2d 811 ; Canon v. Stanley, Tex.Civ.App., 100 S.W.2d 377 . 1942Cain v. Bonner, 108 Tex. 399 , 194 S.W. 1098 , 3 A.L.R. 874 ; Coles v. Kelsey, 2 Tex. 541, 542 , 47 Am.Dec. 661; Cotulla v. Urbahn, 104 Tex. 208 , 126 S.W. 1108 , 135 S.W. 1159 , 34 L.R.A.,N.S., 345, Ann.Cas.1914B, 217; 28 Tex.Jur. 270, Sec. 174; McDonald v. Grey, 29 Tex. 80 ; Braddock v. Brockman, Tex.Civ.App., 29 S.W. 2d 811 ; Canon v. Stanley, Tex.Civ.App., 100 S.W.2d 377 .	1	1942–1942
Ward v. McKenzie neutral · 1870 1 sentence 1931“Although the weight of authority appears to be against the sufficiency of foreign judgments or decrees—even those rendered by' the courts of sister states—as the basis of the suit, in this state where law and equity practice are blended, it has been held not to be essential that the owner of a foreign judgment should establish’it in a Texas court before he can have the benefit of a creditor’s bill.” Id., citing Ward v. McKenzie, 33 Tex. 297 , 7 Am.	1	1931–1931
Carter Bros. & Co. v. Hightower green tex · 1890 1 sentence 1931“Although the weight of authority appears to be against the sufficiency of foreign judgments or decrees—even those rendered by' the courts of sister states—as the basis of the suit, in this state where law and equity practice are blended, it has been held not to be essential that the owner of a foreign judgment should establish’it in a Texas court before he can have the benefit of a creditor’s bill.” Id., citing Ward v. McKenzie, 33 Tex. 297 , 7 Am.	1	1931–1931
Hampton v. Phipps green · 1883 1 sentence 1928Property thus placed under the control of the surety is impressed with a trust in favor of the creditor; for, as .said by the Supreme Oourt of the United States in Hampton v. Phipps, 108 U. S. 264 , 2 S. Ct. 624 [ 27 L.	1	1928–1928
Frees & Son v. Baker green tex · 1891 2 sentences 1916Frees & Son v. Baker, 81 Tex. 216 , 16 S. W. 900 , 13 L. 1916Frees & Son v. Baker, 81 Tex. 216 , 16 S. W. 900 , 13 L.	1	1916–1916
Valentine v. Decker neutral mo · 1869 1 sentence 1900Valentine v. Decker, 43 Mo., 583 .	1	1900–1900
Truitt v. Truitt green ind · 1871 1 sentence 1881Also, Truitt v. Truitt, 38 Ind., 16 ; Pierce v. Wilcox, 40 Ind., 70 ; Spring v. Eisenach, 51 Tex., 432 ; Bump (7th ed.), pp. 146, 536, 540.	1	1881–1881
Pierce v. Wilcox neutral ind · 1872 1 sentence 1881Also, Truitt v. Truitt, 38 Ind., 16 ; Pierce v. Wilcox, 40 Ind., 70 ; Spring v. Eisenach, 51 Tex., 432 ; Bump (7th ed.), pp. 146, 536, 540.	1	1881–1881
Spring v. Eisenach neutral tex · 1879 1 sentence 1881Also, Truitt v. Truitt, 38 Ind., 16 ; Pierce v. Wilcox, 40 Ind., 70 ; Spring v. Eisenach, 51 Tex., 432 ; Bump (7th ed.), pp. 146, 536, 540.	1	1881–1881

Where else courts name it

NY 29 (1857–2017) CA 27 (1887–2026) PA 21 (1860–2023) TX 19 (1881–2024) GA 18 (1886–2022) OH 16 (1849–2026) FL 16 (1930–2022) IL 13 (1883–2025) MD 12 (1932–2011) WA 11 (1913–2020) MA 11 (1842–2005) NJ 11 (1931–2024) MO 10 (1882–2015) MT 9 (1900–2023) NE 9 (1903–2020) IA 9 (1893–2010) LA 9 (1884–1988) AL 8 (1884–2018) KY 7 (1912–2010) MI 7 (1912–2024) UT 6 (1935–2006) AZ 6 (2001–2016) SD 6 (1895–2022) OK 6 (1921–2024) WI 5 (1896–2015) CT 5 (1955–2008) KS 5 (1919–1990) ND 5 (1895–2011) IN 5 (1882–2006) OR 4 (1901–2009) WV 4 (1909–1963) VA 4 (1876–1997) DE 3 (2016–2022) MN 3 (1917–2015) WY 3 (1899–2018) NC 3 (1937–1996) TN 2 (1937–2002) NM 2 (1972–2010) HI 2 (1934–2015) RI 2 (1994–2004) MS 2 (1879–2022) ID 2 (1988–1988)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check