creditor claim in Oklahoma

1994Article nine of the Uniform Commercial Code was intended to define the rights of a secured creditor with respect to the debt- or, purchasers of collateral and competing creditors, (citations omitted) When not named as a loss-payee, a secured creditor, under section 9-306 must bring an action against a debtor where the debtor has received insurance proceeds for the loss of collateral, (citations omitted) The creditor may also claim priority over other creditors who seek to attach such proceeds or pursue an action in conversion against a purchaser or transferee of the collateral or its proceeds,

1994Article nine of the Uniform Commercial Code was intended to define the rights of a secured creditor with respect to the debtor, purchasers of collateral and competing creditors. (citations omitted) When not named as a loss-payee, a secured creditor, under section 9-306 must bring an action against a debtor where the debtor has received insurance proceeds for the loss of collateral. (citations omitted) The creditor may also claim priority over other creditors who seek to attach such proceeds or pursue an action in conversion against a purchaser or transferee of the collateral or its proceeds. (

1980Other jurisdictions also have held that a decree for alimony was not a debt within the meaning of the constitutional and statutory provisions exempting a husband’s wages from the claims of creditors. 3 The Oklahoma Su-preme Court has held that with regard to alimony to be paid from a Workers’ Compensation Award, a wife is not a creditor nor her claim a debt, Commons v. Bragg, 183 Okl. 122 , 80 P.2d 287 (1938).

1980Other jurisdictions also have held that a decree for alimony was not a debt within the meaning of the constitutional and statutory provisions exempting a husband’s wages from the claims of creditors. 3 The Oklahoma Su-preme Court has held that with regard to alimony to be paid from a Workers’ Compensation Award, a wife is not a creditor nor her claim a debt, Commons v. Bragg, 183 Okl. 122 , 80 P.2d 287 (1938).

1938This court, in Sims v. Sims, 150 Okla. 138 , 300 P. 692 , 79 A. L.

1938This court, in Sims v. Sims, 150 Okla. 138 , 300 P. 692 , 79 A. L.

1926No. 8337, where Chief Justice Marshall says: *46 “When .a purchaser has paid money for which others are responsible, the equitable claim which such payment gives him on these who are so responsible shall be clothed with the legal garb with which the contract he lias discharged was invested, and he shall be substituted to every equitable intent and purpose in the place of the creditor whose claim he has discharged.” In the case of Royce et al. v. Bank of Walter, 21 Okla. 484 , 97 Pac. 640 , our court states the rule as follows: “In a case where the territorial Bank Commissioner required the off

1926No. 8337, where Chief Justice Marshall says: *46 “When .a purchaser has paid money for which others are responsible, the equitable claim which such payment gives him on these who are so responsible shall be clothed with the legal garb with which the contract he lias discharged was invested, and he shall be substituted to every equitable intent and purpose in the place of the creditor whose claim he has discharged.” In the case of Royce et al. v. Bank of Walter, 21 Okla. 484 , 97 Pac. 640 , our court states the rule as follows: “In a case where the territorial Bank Commissioner required the off

1926No. 8337, where Chief Justice Marshall says: *46 “When .a purchaser has paid money for which others are responsible, the equitable claim which such payment gives him on these who are so responsible shall be clothed with the legal garb with which the contract he lias discharged was invested, and he shall be substituted to every equitable intent and purpose in the place of the creditor whose claim he has discharged.” In the case of Royce et al. v. Bank of Walter, 21 Okla. 484 , 97 Pac. 640 , our court states the rule as follows: “In a case where the territorial Bank Commissioner required the off

1921“For these reasons, I am satisfied that the sections 12 and 13 impose a penalty, or a disability in that nature, to which the shorter limitation, of three, years applies.” In Rogers et al. v. Bonnett et al., 2 Okla. 553 , 37 Pac. 1078 , we quote from the body of the opinion on page 558, as follows: “Error is again assigned in this, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to. constitute a cause of action, and that the demurrer of plaintiffs in error covered the objections to the petition and evidence, that contribution, cannot be enforced in this case since the statute under which th

1921“For these reasons, I am satisfied that the sections 12 and 13 impose a penalty, or a disability in that nature, to which the shorter limitation, of three, years applies.” In Rogers et al. v. Bonnett et al., 2 Okla. 553 , 37 Pac. 1078 , we quote from the body of the opinion on page 558, as follows: “Error is again assigned in this, that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to. constitute a cause of action, and that the demurrer of plaintiffs in error covered the objections to the petition and evidence, that contribution, cannot be enforced in this case since the statute under which th