17 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1860–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Raynovich v. Romanusgreen2 sentences1977See the later case of Raynovich v. Romanus, 450 Pa. 391 , 299 A. 2d 301 (1973), and particularly the dissenting opinion of Justice Eagen, where he says, at page 403, that the majority has rejected the dicta in McCreary. 1977See the later case of Raynovich v. Romanus, 450 Pa. 391 , 299 A. 2d 301 (1973), and particularly the dissenting opinion of Justice Eagen, where he says, at page 403, that the majority has rejected the dicta in McCreary. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
green
2 sentences2019Id. at 83 . 2019Id. at 83 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences1967Gagliardi Unemployment Compensation Case, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 142 , 141 A. 2d 410 (1958). 1967Gagliardi Unemployment Compensation Case, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 142 , 141 A. 2d 410 (1958). | 2 | 1959–1967 |
Breed v. Hillhouse
green
2 sentences1886That is the case of Trimble v. Thorne, 16 Johns. 152 , and it has often been spoken of with disapprobation by other courts: Breed v. Hillhouse, 7 Conn. 523 ; Kernan v. McRea, 7 Porter (Ala.) 184; and it was finally overruled in New York in Tebbetts v. Dowd, 23 Wend. 379 ).” The same principle is recognized in the recent case of Moyer’s Appeal, 6 Norris 129. 1860That is the case of Trimble v. Thorn, 16 Johns. 152 , and it has often been spoken of with disapprobation by other courts: Breed v. Hillhouse, 7 Conn. 523 ; 7 Porter (Ala.) 184; and it was finally overruled in New York, in Tebbets v. Doud, 23 Wendell 379 . | 2 | 1860–1886 |
Tebbetts & Pearce v. Dowd
green
2 sentences1886That is the case of Trimble v. Thorne, 16 Johns. 152 , and it has often been spoken of with disapprobation by other courts: Breed v. Hillhouse, 7 Conn. 523 ; Kernan v. McRea, 7 Porter (Ala.) 184; and it was finally overruled in New York in Tebbetts v. Dowd, 23 Wend. 379 ).” The same principle is recognized in the recent case of Moyer’s Appeal, 6 Norris 129. 1860That is the case of Trimble v. Thorn, 16 Johns. 152 , and it has often been spoken of with disapprobation by other courts: Breed v. Hillhouse, 7 Conn. 523 ; 7 Porter (Ala.) 184; and it was finally overruled in New York, in Tebbets v. Doud, 23 Wendell 379 . | 2 | 1860–1886 |
Trimble v. Thorne
green
2 sentences1886That is the case of Trimble v. Thorne, 16 Johns. 152 , and it has often been spoken of with disapprobation by other courts: Breed v. Hillhouse, 7 Conn. 523 ; Kernan v. McRea, 7 Porter (Ala.) 184; and it was finally overruled in New York in Tebbetts v. Dowd, 23 Wend. 379 ).” The same principle is recognized in the recent case of Moyer’s Appeal, 6 Norris 129. 1860That is the case of Trimble v. Thorn, 16 Johns. 152 , and it has often been spoken of with disapprobation by other courts: Breed v. Hillhouse, 7 Conn. 523 ; 7 Porter (Ala.) 184; and it was finally overruled in New York, in Tebbets v. Doud, 23 Wendell 379 . | 2 | 1860–1886 |
Inkpen v. Roberts
green
2 sentences2007In re Holton's Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) ( en banc ); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa. Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). 2007In re Holton’s Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (en banc); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Department of Banking & Trumark Financial Credit Union
green
2 sentences2007In re Holton's Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) ( en banc ); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa. Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). 2007In re Holton’s Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (en banc); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood
green
2 sentences2007In re Holton's Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Dep't of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) ( en banc ); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa. Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). 2007In re Holton’s Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (en banc); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Holton Estate
green
2 sentences2007In re Holton’s Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (en banc); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). 2007In re Holton’s Estate, 399 Pa. 241 , 159 A.2d 883 (1960); Pennsylvania Bankers Ass’n v. Pennsylvania Dep’t of Banking and Trumark Financial Credit Union, 893 A.2d 864 (Pa.Cmwlth.2006) (en banc); Inkpen v. Roberts, 862 A.2d 700 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004); Borough of Pitcairn v. Westwood, 848 A.2d 158 (Pa.Cmwlth.2004). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Litzelman Appeal
green
2 sentences1978Litselman Appeal, 207 Pa. Superior Ct. 374 , 217 A.2d 838 (1966); Commonwealth ex rel. 1978Litselman Appeal, 207 Pa. Superior Ct. 374 , 217 A.2d 838 (1966); Commonwealth ex rel. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Commonwealth Ex Rel. McCreary v. Major
green
1 sentence1977McCreary v. Major, 343 Pa. 355, 361 , 22 A. 2d 680 (1941), which states the opposite rule. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Mohler's Estate
green
1 sentence1977McCreary v. Major, 343 Pa. 355, 361 , 22 A. 2d 680 (1941), which states the opposite rule. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Commonwealth v. Potter
green
2 sentences1972For example, we recently held in Commonwealth v. Potter, 445 Pa. 284 , 285 A. 2d 492 (1971), that a new trial was required when the prosecutor expressed his personal opinion of the defendant's credibility in the presence of the jury. 1972For example, we recently held in Commonwealth v. Potter, 445 Pa. 284 , 285 A. 2d 492 (1971), that a new trial was required when the prosecutor expressed his personal opinion of the defendant's credibility in the presence of the jury. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Williams v. Standard Oil Co. of La.
green
1 sentence1953Williams v. Standard Oil Co., 278 U. S. 235, 242 ; Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost, 286 U. S. 165, 184 ; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission, 286 U. S. 210, 235 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
UTAH POWER & LIGHT CO. v. PFOST, COMMISSIONER OF LAW ENFORCEMENT, Et Al.
green
1 sentence1953Williams v. Standard Oil Co., 278 U. S. 235, 242 ; Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost, 286 U. S. 165, 184 ; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission, 286 U. S. 210, 235 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Champlin Rfg. Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma
green
1 sentence1953Williams v. Standard Oil Co., 278 U. S. 235, 242 ; Utah Power & Light Co. v. Pfost, 286 U. S. 165, 184 ; Champlin Refining Co. v. Corporation Commission, 286 U. S. 210, 235 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Davies v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
neutral
1 sentence1917Co., 228 Pa. 176 , but the very opposite instruction was given, and emphasized by specially calling the attention of the jury to the names of the defendant’s witnesses, their opportunity for knowing the facts and a summary of their testimony. | 1 | 1917–1917 |
Wells v. Caywood
green
1 sentence1910It is true that in a number of jurisdictions the opposite rule has been adopted: Savage v. Savage, 80 Me. 472 ; Wells v. Cay wood, 3 Colo. 487 ; Robertson v. Robertson, 25 Iowa, 350 ; Burdeno v. Amperse, 14 Mich. 90 ; but the statutes in those states do not require the husband to join in the deed. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Savage v. Savage
neutral
1 sentence1910It is true that in a number of jurisdictions the opposite rule has been adopted: Savage v. Savage, 80 Me. 472 ; Wells v. Cay wood, 3 Colo. 487 ; Robertson v. Robertson, 25 Iowa, 350 ; Burdeno v. Amperse, 14 Mich. 90 ; but the statutes in those states do not require the husband to join in the deed. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Robertson v. Robertson
neutral
1 sentence1910It is true that in a number of jurisdictions the opposite rule has been adopted: Savage v. Savage, 80 Me. 472 ; Wells v. Cay wood, 3 Colo. 487 ; Robertson v. Robertson, 25 Iowa, 350 ; Burdeno v. Amperse, 14 Mich. 90 ; but the statutes in those states do not require the husband to join in the deed. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Buck v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1898Counsel for appellee seems to rely upon Buck v. The Commonwealth, 107 Pa. 486 , as holding an opposite doctrine, but it is really in harmony with the rule we have stated. | 1 | 1898–1898 |
Dean v. Pennsylvania R.
neutral
1 sentence1893Co., 129 Pa. 514 , cited and relied on by appellee as sustaining the instruction complained of, really recognize the opposite doctrine. | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Stockton & Stokes v. Demuth
neutral
1 sentence1867The case of Stockton & Stokes v. Demuth, 7 Watts 39 , relied on for an opposite rule, is an older catee than those cited above, excepting one, perhaps, and I do not think it' proves what is claimed for it. | 1 | 1867–1867 |
Houston v. Moore
green
1 sentence1865The case of Houston v. Moore, determined by this court, and reported in 3 S. & R. 169, and affirmed in the Supreme Court of the United States, 5 Wheat. 1 , has been referred to for an opposite doctrine. | 1 | 1865–1865 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.