opposite rule (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

opposite rule in Ohio

6 Ohio opinions name it 3 courts 1840–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
State ex rel. Carpenter v. Warren Municipal Court green
ohio · 1980
1 sentence

2008The Court reasoned that, if the opposite rule were adopted, tenants in danger of eviction could first file an injunction or quiet title action in order to stay future eviction proceedings and thereby "obviate the purpose of the eviction statutes." Id.

12008–2008
United States v. Wade green
scotus · 1967
1 sentence

1970Ed. 2d 1149 , 87 S. Ct. 1926 , is distinguished from Pointer by the presence in Wade (to a great degree) and complete absence in Pointer of the other two considerations militating against retroactive application: (a) prior reliance on an opposite rule and (b) disruption of the administration of justice (which is merely a circuitous way of saying there would be a floodtide of prisoners released).

11970–1970
Wetmore v. Mellinger green
iowa · 1884
2 sentences

1950Wetmore v. Mellinger, 64 Iowa 741 , 18 N. W. 870 , 52 Am.

1950Wetmore v. Mellinger, 64 Iowa 741 , 18 N. W. 870 , 52 Am.

11950–1950
Manly v. Bitzer neutral
kyctapp · 1891
1 sentence

1906In Manly v. Bitzer, 91 Ky., 596, 598 , Chief Justice Holt says: “Looking at the question from the standpoint of public policy, there are two views presented, which, perhaps, balance each other.

11906–1906
Clancy v. Kenworthy green
iowa · 1887
1 sentence

1896In Clancy v. Kenworthy, 74 Iowa, 740 , it was held, that sureties on a constable’s bond, “ are liable for acts of the constable, in unlawfully, and abusively arresting and imprisoning and prosecuting a party, and they cannot escape liability by the fact that the acts complained of were instigated by malice.” None of the cases heretofore referred to in this opinion, holding the opposite doctrine, was before the court in that case; and the opinion was based upon the holding in the Kentucky cases, supra, and the apparent approval thereof in some of the text books.

11896–1896
Fairfax's v. Hunter's Lessee green
· 1813
1 sentence

1840In Fairfax v. Hunter, 7 Cranch, 603 , where it was argued that the legislature of Virginia might, by a simple enactment, confiscate the property of an alien, it was answered, that admitting that it might, yet it would not be presumed, 'where there was any room for an opposite presumption, that it was in tended to dispense with the accustomed mode of proceeding.

11840–1840

Where else courts name it

CA 62 (1854–2025) IL 54 (1852–2021) NY 38 (1838–2025) TX 34 (1871–2024) WA 26 (1890–2025) MO 24 (1862–2021) WI 20 (1860–2008) NJ 19 (1832–2008) IN 19 (1872–2019) IA 18 (1859–2018) AL 18 (1854–2025) PA 17 (1860–2019) OR 14 (1883–2024) OK 13 (1925–2017) NC 13 (1878–2009) MN 12 (1893–2006) MI 11 (1897–2022) TN 11 (1889–2017) WV 9 (1895–2022) KY 9 (1840–2026) AR 8 (1874–2019) AZ 8 (1972–2024) NE 8 (1889–2000) VA 8 (1846–2026) ND 7 (1900–2014) MA 7 (1849–2025) NM 7 (1886–2023) OH 6 (1840–2008) CO 6 (1892–2003) AK 5 (1981–1996) MD 5 (1896–1980) MS 5 (1895–2017) ID 5 (1932–2021) LA 4 (1824–1988) GA 4 (1935–2026) VT 4 (1898–2021) WY 4 (1934–2015) FL 4 (1955–2019) SC 4 (1870–1998) UT 4 (1935–2024) CT 3 (2005–2012) ME 3 (1841–2018) SD 2 (1951–2007) MT 2 (1993–2006) KS 2 (1886–1942) NH 2 (1867–1873) PR 2 (1911–1953) HI 2 (1996–2019) DC 2 (1970–2005)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check