12 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gaare v. Board of County Commissionersgreen2 sentences2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its 2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its | 1 | 1 |
Hitchcock v. County of Sherburnegreen2 sentences2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its 2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its | 1 | 1 |
Stevens v. Lycan & Co.green2 sentences2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its 2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its | 1 | 1 |
Edwin Miller and Donna Miller, Executors for Douglas Miller, Deceased v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1984Miller v. United States, 643 F.2d 481, 483-85 (8th Cir.1980) rev’d on other grounds on rehearing, 643 F.2d 490 (8th Cir.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Clarke v. Stategreen1 sentence1972App. 447, 451 , 240 A. 2d 291, 294 (1968). 1 The opposite rule was applied in Proctor v. United States, 131 App. D. | 1 | 1 |
David Proctor v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1972C. 241, 242, 404 F. 2d 819, 820 (1968). | 1 | 1 |
Farmer v. Board of Tradegreen1 sentence1902See Lewis v. Wilson, supra In Farmer v. Board, 78 Mo. App. 557, 566 , a case directly in point, this distinction is referred to thus: “It is well known that parties cannot, by agreement to arbitrate future differences, oust the courts of jurisdiction; but that principle of law does not affect our statement that the association may have a rule requiring all differences between members to be settled by arbitration and to impose expulsion as a penalty for disobedience of such rule. | 1 | 1 |
Coolidge v. Allengreen1 sentence1893See Smith v. Bibber, 82 Me. 34 , ( 19 Atl. | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Bibbergreen1 sentence1893See Smith v. Bibber, 82 Me. 34 , ( 19 Atl. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tholkes v. Decock
green
2 sentences2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its 2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Spanel v. Mounds View School District No. 621
green
2 sentences2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its 2006Dist., 264 Minn. 279 , 118 N.W.2d 795 (1962); Tholkes v. Decock, 125 Minn. 507 , 147 N.W. 648 (1914) (towns); Hitchcock v. County of Sherburne, 227 Minn. 132, 135 , 34 N.W.2d 342, 344 (1948) (towns and counties); Gaare v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Clay County, 90 Minn. 530, 531-32 , 97 N.W. 422, 423 (1903) (counties); Stevens v. Lycan Co., 259 Minn. 106, 108 , 105 N.W.2d 889, 891 (1960) (noting that "from early times" we held municipalities liable but, "[p]eculiarly, we have followed the opposite rule with respect to liability of towns and counties holding that neither the town or county or its | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson v. City of Minneapolis
green
2 sentences2006In Anderson, we eliminated the distinction between municipalities and the state and its subdivisions by holding "that the exceptions to common law governmental tort immunity [for municipalities] apply to other governmental entities, including the state, as well as to municipalities." Anderson, 296 N.W.2d at 387 . 2006In Anderson , we eliminated the distinction between municipalities and the state and its subdivisions by holding "that the exceptions to common law governmental tort immunity [for municipalities] apply to other governmental entities, including the state, as well as to municipalities.” Anderson, 296 N.W.2d at 387 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp.
green
2 sentences1977In support of an opposite rule, the department relies on two decisions, Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp., 219 Minn. 306 , 18 N.W.2d 249 (1945), and Lewis v. Minneapolis Moline, Inc., 288 Minn. 432 , 181 N.W.2d 701 (1970). 1977In support of an opposite rule, the department relies on two decisions, Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp., 219 Minn. 306 , 18 N.W.2d 249 (1945), and Lewis v. Minneapolis Moline, Inc., 288 Minn. 432 , 181 N.W.2d 701 (1970). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Lewis v. Minneapolis Moline, Inc.
green
2 sentences1977In support of an opposite rule, the department relies on two decisions, Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp., 219 Minn. 306 , 18 N.W.2d 249 (1945), and Lewis v. Minneapolis Moline, Inc., 288 Minn. 432 , 181 N.W.2d 701 (1970). 1977In support of an opposite rule, the department relies on two decisions, Fannon v. Federal Cartridge Corp., 219 Minn. 306 , 18 N.W.2d 249 (1945), and Lewis v. Minneapolis Moline, Inc., 288 Minn. 432 , 181 N.W.2d 701 (1970). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Weberg v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad
green
2 sentences1962Co. 239 Minn. 345 , 59 N. W. (2d) 317 , although prior to the adoption of Rule 59.06 an opposite rule prevailed. 1962Co. 239 Minn. 345 , 59 N. W. (2d) 317 , although prior to the adoption of Rule 59.06 an opposite rule prevailed. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
Schmit v. Village of Cold Spring
neutral
2 sentences1962Schmit v. Village of Cold Spring, 215 Minn. 572 , 10 N. W. (2d) 727 ; State ex rel. 1962Schmit v. Village of Cold Spring, 215 Minn. 572 , 10 N. W. (2d) 727 ; State ex rel. | 1 | 1962–1962 |
City of Red Wing v. Eichinger
green
2 sentences1958It was rejected by the United States Supreme Court. [8] Among others in support of this statement is cited the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. [9] City of Red Wing v. Eichinger, 163 Minn. 54 , 203 N.W. 622 . 1958It was rejected by the United States Supreme Court. [8] Among others in support of this statement is cited the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act. [9] City of Red Wing v. Eichinger, 163 Minn. 54 , 203 N.W. 622 . | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Henderson Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Owensboro Home Telephone & Telegraph Co.
neutral
2 sentences1958Co. 192 Ky. 322 , 233 S. W. 743 , is cited in the opinion above in support of the opposite rule. 1958Co. 192 Ky. 322 , 233 S. W. 743 , is cited in the opinion above in support of the opposite rule. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
Olmstead v. Lamphier
green
2 sentences1940Johnson v. Roberts, 212 Ala. 535 , 103 So. 563 ; Celia v. Industrial Acc. Comm. 38 Cal. App. 760 , 177 P. 490 ; Olmstead v. Lamphier, 93 Conn. 20 , 104 A. 488 , 7 A. L. 1940Johnson v. Roberts, 212 Ala. 535 , 103 So. 563 ; Celia v. Industrial Acc. Comm. 38 Cal. App. 760 , 177 P. 490 ; Olmstead v. Lamphier, 93 Conn. 20 , 104 A. 488 , 7 A. L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Johnson v. Roberts
neutral
2 sentences1940Johnson v. Roberts, 212 Ala. 535 , 103 So. 563 ; Celia v. Industrial Acc. Comm. 38 Cal. App. 760 , 177 P. 490 ; Olmstead v. Lamphier, 93 Conn. 20 , 104 A. 488 , 7 A. L. 1940Johnson v. Roberts, 212 Ala. 535 , 103 So. 563 ; Celia v. Industrial Acc. Comm. 38 Cal. App. 760 , 177 P. 490 ; Olmstead v. Lamphier, 93 Conn. 20 , 104 A. 488 , 7 A. L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Cella v. Industrial Accident Commission
neutral
2 sentences1940Johnson v. Roberts, 212 Ala. 535 , 103 So. 563 ; Celia v. Industrial Acc. Comm. 38 Cal. App. 760 , 177 P. 490 ; Olmstead v. Lamphier, 93 Conn. 20 , 104 A. 488 , 7 A. L. 1940Johnson v. Roberts, 212 Ala. 535 , 103 So. 563 ; Celia v. Industrial Acc. Comm. 38 Cal. App. 760 , 177 P. 490 ; Olmstead v. Lamphier, 93 Conn. 20 , 104 A. 488 , 7 A. L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Allen v. Pioneer-Press Co.
green
1 sentence1938Complaint is made because the court did not instruct: “Mere belief in the truth of the statements is not sufficient to constitute good faith. * * * It requires *9 * * the care and vigilance of á prudent and conscientious person, * ® * an absence not only of all improper motives but of negligence,” and the giving of this alleged opposite instruction: “It is not a malicious act to publish in a newspaper information relative to the unfitness of a candidate for the office he seeks which the publisher has reasonable ground to believe is true.” The requested instructions were taken from Justice Mitc | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Williams v. Langevin
green
1 sentence1938Complaint is made because the court did not instruct: “Mere belief in the truth of the statements is not sufficient to constitute good faith. * * * It requires *9 * * the care and vigilance of á prudent and conscientious person, * ® * an absence not only of all improper motives but of negligence,” and the giving of this alleged opposite instruction: “It is not a malicious act to publish in a newspaper information relative to the unfitness of a candidate for the office he seeks which the publisher has reasonable ground to believe is true.” The requested instructions were taken from Justice Mitc | 1 | 1938–1938 |
White v. Wilmington City Railway Co.
neutral
1 sentence1909Super.] 63 Atl. 931 ): “There is no priority of right, so that the right of neither is exclusive. * * * Life and limb are of more consequence than quick transit. * * * The opposite doctrine appears to have found lodgment in many minds, and there seems to be a disposition to assume that a foot passenger has no right upon a public street as against a street car. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Pierce v. Drew
green
1 sentence1895The opposite doctrine is held in the following cases, by a divided court, except in the' last case cited, and in that one the fee was in the public: Pierce v. Drew, 136 Mass. 75 ; Julia Building Ass’n v. Bell T. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Julia Building Ass'n v. Bell Telephone Co.
neutral
1 sentence1895Co., 88 Mo. 258 ; People v. Eaton, 100 Mich. 208 , 59 N. W. 145 ; Irwin v. Great S. T. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
People v. Eaton
green
2 sentences1895Co., 88 Mo. 258 ; People v. Eaton, 100 Mich. 208 , 59 N. W. 145 ; Irwin v. Great S. T. 1895Co., 88 Mo. 258 ; People v. Eaton, 100 Mich. 208 , 59 N. W. 145 ; Irwin v. Great S. T. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.