16 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1894–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kimco Leasing, Inc. v. Ransom Junior High Schoolgreen2 sentences2020“Before a trial court may disregard or set aside an agreed to forum-selection clause, the party opposing the enforcement of the clause must ‘clearly show that enforcement would be unreasonable and unjust, or that the clause was invalid for such reasons as fraud or overreaching.’” Kimco Leasing, Inc. v. Ransom Jr. High Sch., 556 N.E.2d 1371, 1372 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990) (quoting M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 , 92 S. Ct. 1907, 1916 , 32 L. 1995Kimco Leasing, Inc. v. Ransom Junior High School (1990), Ind.App., 556 N.E.2d 1371, 1372 . | 1 | 2 |
Austin Lakes Joint Venture v. Avon Utilities, Inc.green1 sentence2024See Austin Lakes, 648 N.E.2d at 645 . | 1 | 1 |
Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance v. Richiegreen1 sentence2012The first sentence clearly states that “nothing in this section shall affect or prevent the enforcement of a claim for injury....” Subsection (f) is among the things in “this section.” Accordingly we conclude that the only requirement that Indiana Code § 29 — 1—14—1 (f) imposes on a tort action seeking liability insurance proceeds is that the suit be filed within the tort statute of limitations. 707 N.E.2d 992, 995 (Ind.1999). | 1 | 1 |
Eyster v. Gaffgreen2 sentences1904See Eyster v. Gaff (1876), 91 U. S. 521 , 23 L. 1904See Eyster v. Gaff (1876), 91 U. S. 521 , 23 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.
red
2 sentences2020“Before a trial court may disregard or set aside an agreed to forum-selection clause, the party opposing the enforcement of the clause must ‘clearly show that enforcement would be unreasonable and unjust, or that the clause was invalid for such reasons as fraud or overreaching.’” Kimco Leasing, Inc. v. Ransom Jr. High Sch., 556 N.E.2d 1371, 1372 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990) (quoting M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 , 92 S. Ct. 1907, 1916 , 32 L. 2020“Before a trial court may disregard or set aside an agreed to forum-selection clause, the party opposing the enforcement of the clause must ‘clearly show that enforcement would be unreasonable and unjust, or that the clause was invalid for such reasons as fraud or overreaching.’” Kimco Leasing, Inc. v. Ransom Jr. High Sch., 556 N.E.2d 1371, 1372 (Ind. Ct. App. 1990) (quoting M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1, 15 , 92 S. Ct. 1907, 1916 , 32 L. | 2 | 1990–2020 |
Buffalo v. Buffalo
green
2 sentences1996There is no longer any reason for the enforcement of the immunity rule for the father's benefit." Id. at 713 . 1991There is no longer any reason for the enforcement of the immunity rule for the father’s benefit. 441 N.E.2d at 713 . | 2 | 1991–1996 |
Jasper & Chicago Motor Express, Inc. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc.
green
2 sentences1975In the case of Jasper & Chicago Motor Express, Inc. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc. (1961), 241 Ind. 643 , 175 N.E.2d 20 , the Supreme Court on Petition to Transfer stated it disapproved the statement in the opinion of the Appellate Court to the effect that failure to name a party in the assignment of errors is jurisdictional. 1975In the case of Jasper & Chicago Motor Express, Inc. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc. (1961), 241 Ind. 643 , 175 N.E.2d 20 , the Supreme Court on Petition to Transfer stated it disapproved the statement in the opinion of the Appellate Court to the effect that failure to name a party in the assignment of errors is jurisdictional. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Harvey Hubbell, Inc. v. General Electric Co.
green
1 sentence1950The enforcement of such claim would permit unfair appropriation, and deny the exercise of the right of fair competition.” *210 In Harvey Hubbell, Inc. v. General Electric Co. (1919), 262 Fed. 155 at page 160 it was said: “No court has ever gone to the extent of permitting the establishment of a monopoly of proportions or measurements, in the absence of some patent protection. | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Hildebrand v. Kinney
green
1 sentence1923It 4. is generally recognized that the law, on equitable principles and grounds of public policy, imposes on the estate of every deceased person a liability for the reasonable cost of burying the body, usually designated as funeral expenses. 11 R.C.L. 223; Hildebrand v. Kinney (1909), 172 Ind. 447 ; Snyder v. Thieme Wagner Brew. | 1 | 1923–1923 |
Puett v. Beard
green
1 sentence1915Koons v. Beech (1897), 147 Ind. 137 , 45 N. E. 601 , 46 N. E. 587 ; Justice v. Justice (1888), 115 Ind. 201 , 16 N. E. 615 ; Puett v. Beard (1882), 86 Ind. 172 , 44 Am. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Justice v. Justice
green
2 sentences1915Koons v. Beech (1897), 147 Ind. 137 , 45 N. E. 601 , 46 N. E. 587 ; Justice v. Justice (1888), 115 Ind. 201 , 16 N. E. 615 ; Puett v. Beard (1882), 86 Ind. 172 , 44 Am. 1915Koons v. Beech (1897), 147 Ind. 137 , 45 N. E. 601 , 46 N. E. 587 ; Justice v. Justice (1888), 115 Ind. 201 , 16 N. E. 615 ; Puett v. Beard (1882), 86 Ind. 172 , 44 Am. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Koons v. Beach
green
2 sentences1915Koons v. Beech (1897), 147 Ind. 137 , 45 N. E. 601 , 46 N. E. 587 ; Justice v. Justice (1888), 115 Ind. 201 , 16 N. E. 615 ; Puett v. Beard (1882), 86 Ind. 172 , 44 Am. 1915Koons v. Beech (1897), 147 Ind. 137 , 45 N. E. 601 , 46 N. E. 587 ; Justice v. Justice (1888), 115 Ind. 201 , 16 N. E. 615 ; Puett v. Beard (1882), 86 Ind. 172 , 44 Am. | 1 | 1915–1915 |
Smith v. State ex rel. Hamill
neutral
1 sentence1902Smith v. State, ex rel., 137 Ind. 198 ; Egan v. Ohio, etc., R. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
State v. Gerhardt
green
1 sentence1902State v. Gerhardt, 145 Ind. 439 , 33 L. | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Wright v. Hughes
neutral
1 sentence1900In Wright v. Hughes, 119 Ind. 324 , it was said: “Like natural persons, corporations must be held to the observance of the recognized principles of common honesty and good faith, and .these principles render the doctrine of ultra vires unavailing when its application would accomplish an unjust end, or result in the perpetration of a legal fraud. | 1 | 1900–1900 |
Robinson v. Anderson
neutral
1 sentence1894Robinson v. Anderson, 106 Ind. 152 ; Runyon v. Snell, 116 Ind. 164 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Runyon v. Snell
green
1 sentence1894Robinson v. Anderson, 106 Ind. 152 ; Runyon v. Snell, 116 Ind. 164 . | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.