16 Tennessee opinions name it 3 courts 1995–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bondsgreen2 sentences2026App. 2024), perm. app. denied (Tenn. May 23, 2025) (citing State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118, 141 (Tenn. Crim. 2024See State v. Bonds, 502 S.W.3d 118, 141 (Tenn. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Butlergreen2 sentences2003See State v. Butler, 795 S.W.2d 680, 686 (Tenn. Crim. 2002See State v. Butler, 795 S.W.2d 680, 686 (Tenn. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Cranston v. Combsgreen2 sentences2013Cranston, 106 S.W.3d at 644 ; Kendrick, 90 S.W.3d at 569 ; Curtis, 215 S.W.3d at 840 . 2011“Only if a material change of circumstances is shown to exist is the trial court to proceed to the next step of the analysis: whether modification of the existing parenting arrangement is in the child’s best interest.” Birdwell v. Harris, 2007 WL 4523119 , at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2007) (citing Cranston v. Combs, 106 S.W.3d 641, 644 (Tenn. 2003) and Curtis, 215 S.W.3d at 840 ). | 1 | 3 |
State v. Allengreen2 sentences2003Allen, 69 S.W.3d at 187 . 2002See Allen, 69 S.W.3d at 187 . -7- The next step of our inquiry is an examination of the evidence to determine if an instruction on facilitation of the crimes was warranted. | 1 | 2 |
State of Tennessee v. Kacy Dewayne Cannongreen1 sentence2010See Cannon, 254 S.W.3d at 303 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kendrick v. Shoemake
green
2 sentences2013Cranston, 106 S.W.3d at 644 ; Kendrick, 90 S.W.3d at 569 ; Curtis, 215 S.W.3d at 840 . 2008Cranston, 106 S.W.3d at 644 ; Kendrick, 90 S.W.3d at 569 ; Curtis, 215 S.W.3d at 840 . | 3 | 2007–2013 |
Curtis v. Hill
green
2 sentences2013Cranston, 106 S.W.3d at 644 ; Kendrick, 90 S.W.3d at 569 ; Curtis, 215 S.W.3d at 840 . 2011“Only if a material change of circumstances is shown to exist is the trial court to proceed to the next step of the analysis: whether modification of the existing parenting arrangement is in the child’s best interest.” Birdwell v. Harris, 2007 WL 4523119 , at *5 (Tenn. Ct. App. Dec. 20, 2007) (citing Cranston v. Combs, 106 S.W.3d 641, 644 (Tenn. 2003) and Curtis, 215 S.W.3d at 840 ). | 3 | 2008–2013 |
Workman v. State
green
2 sentences2010In Workman v. State, 41 S.W.3d 100 (Tenn. 2001), a case relied heavily upon by the petitioner, the Tennessee Supreme Court reviewed a case in which the petitioner was denied a hearing on his petition for writ of error coram nobis because the statute of limitations for filing had passed. 2004In Workman v. State, 41 S.W.3d 100 (Tenn.2001), a case relied heavily upon by the petitioner, the Tennessee Supreme Court reviewed a case in which the petitioner was denied a hearing on his petition for writ of error coram nobis because the statute of limitations for filing had passed. | 2 | 2004–2010 |
Robinson v. Brooks
green
1 sentence2000The equitable remedy of rescission is “available only under the most demanding circumstances.” Robinson, 577 S.W.2d at 208 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Duchac v. State
green
1 sentence1998If the same evidenc e is not us ed to prove each offense, “‘then the fact tha t both cha rges rela te to, and grow out of, one transaction, does not mak e a sin gle offense whe re two are define d by the statutes.’” Denton, 938 S.W.2d at 380 (quoting Duchac, 505 S.W.2d at 239 ). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
State v. Denton
red
1 sentence1998If the same evidenc e is not us ed to prove each offense, “‘then the fact tha t both cha rges rela te to, and grow out of, one transaction, does not mak e a sin gle offense whe re two are define d by the statutes.’” Denton, 938 S.W.2d at 380 (quoting Duchac, 505 S.W.2d at 239 ). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Swanson v. State
green
1 sentence1995As noted above, the Court of Criminal Appeals found that the Sandstrom claim was a “later-arising ground” because this Court did not hold that Sandstrom could be applied retroactively until our 1988 decision in Swanson, supra, and because Sands effectively had no opportunity to present the claim until after the limitations period would have begun to run. *302 With all due respect, we conclude that this finding is erroneous. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.