8 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Foster ex rel. Foster v. Klaumanngreen1 sentence2016See Foster, 296 Kan. at 301 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Sczubelekgreen1 sentence2003See Von Raab, 489 U.S. at 665 ; Skinner, 489 U.S. at 619 ; United States v. Sczubelek, 255 F. Supp. 2d 315, 320 (D. | 1 | 1 |
National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raabgreen1 sentence2003See Von Raab, 489 U.S. at 665 ; Skinner, 489 U.S. at 619 ; United States v. Sczubelek, 255 F. Supp. 2d 315, 320 (D. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schuyler v. Roberts
green
1 sentence2022Schuyler, 285 Kan. at 679 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
State v. Bowen
green
1 sentence2018Bowen , 299 Kan. at 348 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Story
green
2 sentences2016“In order to require the instruction, there must have been evidence that would reasonably justify a conviction of the lesser included crime. [State v. Story,] 300 Kan. [702,] 710[, 334 P.3d 297 (2014)]. 2016"In order to require the instruction, there must have been evidence that would reasonably justify a conviction of the lesser included crime. [State v. Story,] 300 Kan. [702,] 710 [, 334 P.3d 297 (2014)]. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Riojas
green
1 sentence2013Riojas, 288 Kan. at 383 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Tapia
green
1 sentence2013This “naturally depends on whether the witness is an accomplice.” Tapia, 295 Kan. at 996 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
United States v. Watson
green
2 sentences2006Probable Cause to Arrest “[T]he Fourth Amendment permits a duly authorized law enforcement officer to malee a warrantless arrest in a public place even though he had adequate opportunity to procure a warrant after developing probable cause for arrest.” United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 426-27 , 46 L. 2006Probable Cause to Arrest “[T]he Fourth Amendment permits a duly authorized law enforcement officer to malee a warrantless arrest in a public place even though he had adequate opportunity to procure a warrant after developing probable cause for arrest.” United States v. Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 426-27 , 46 L. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.
green
1 sentence2003See Von Raab, 489 U.S. at 665 ; Skinner, 489 U.S. at 619 ; United States v. Sczubelek, 255 F. Supp. 2d 315, 320 (D. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.