allowance claim (Indiana) · Go Syfert
← Indiana issues

allowance claim in Indiana

15 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1891–1996 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (34)

CaseCitedYears
Cole v. Lafontaine neutral
ind · 1882
2 sentences

1921Cole v. Lafontaine (1882), 84 Ind. 446 ; Jackson v. Weaver (1884), 98 Ind. 307 .

1917Cole, Admr., v. Lafontaine (1882), 84 Ind. 446, 449 ; Scherer v. Ingerman, Admr. (1887), 110 Ind. 428, 437 , 11 N. E. 8 , 12 N. E. 304 ; O’Haleran v. O’Haleran (1888), 115 Ind. 493, 494 , 17 N. E. 917 .

21917–1921
Goodbub v. Estate of Hornung green
ind · 1891
2 sentences

1996With respect to the allowance of a claim, "(tlhe statute fixes the order of priority of claims, and this the court cannot change." Goodbub v. Hornung's Estate (1891), 127 Ind. 181 , 26 N.E. 770 , 77l.

1996With respect to the allowance of a claim, "(tlhe statute fixes the order of priority of claims, and this the court cannot change." Goodbub v. Hornung's Estate (1891), 127 Ind. 181 , 26 N.E. 770 , 77l.

11996–1996
Rosenbaum v. Dutton green
ca8 · 1913
1 sentence

1981To support its argument the University cites 11 U.S.C. § 502 (d) and Rosenbaum v. Dutton, (8th Cir. 1913) 203 F. 838 . 11 U.S.C. § 502 (d) provides that proven claims shall be allowed unless parties in interest object to their allowance.

11981–1981
Price v. Engle neutral
indctapp · 1922
2 sentences

1968“Since the statute requires that the clerk keep a record showing the filing of all claims against estates and of the allowance or disallowance of the same, and requires that the action of the executor or administrator in allowing or disallowing all claims be in writing, we hold that the allowance of a claim must be proven by the record, and that when the record does not show an allowance that the intention of the administrator to allow the claim cannot be proven by oral testimony.” Price v. Engle (1922), 77 Ind. App. 439, 447 , 133 N. E. 755 , No question has been presented to us concerning ap

1968“Since the statute requires that the clerk keep a record showing the filing of all claims against estates and of the allowance or disallowance of the same, and requires that the action of the executor or administrator in allowing or disallowing all claims be in writing, we hold that the allowance of a claim must be proven by the record, and that when the record does not show an allowance that the intention of the administrator to allow the claim cannot be proven by oral testimony.” Price v. Engle (1922), 77 Ind. App. 439, 447 , 133 N. E. 755 , No question has been presented to us concerning ap

11968–1968
Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank green
scotus · 1905
2 sentences

1937We quote at length what the court said upon this proposition (p. 760) : “The Supreme Court of the United States has lately held, in Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank, 197 U. S. 356 , 25 Sup. Ct. 443, 49 L.

1937We quote at length what the court said upon this proposition (p. 760) : “The Supreme Court of the United States has lately held, in Keppel v. Tiffin Savings Bank, 197 U. S. 356 , 25 Sup. Ct. 443, 49 L.

11937–1937
Adam v. Board of Commissioners neutral
indctapp · 1917
2 sentences

1927In many respects, however, the action of the board is as binding on the claimant as is a judgment, and unless resort is had to one of the two statutory remedies above mentioned, the action of the board is conclusive against the claimant.” In Adams v. Board, etc. (1917), 66 Ind. App. 48 , 117 N. E. 876 , the court, in discussing the right of a party to bring an action on a claim where there had been an allowance of the claim in a sum which was in fact intended only as a partial payment, and where the parties, at' the time of the allowance, entered into a supplemental agreement concerning the fi

1927In many respects, however, the action of the board is as binding on the claimant as is a judgment, and unless resort is had to one of the two statutory remedies above mentioned, the action of the board is conclusive against the claimant.” In Adams v. Board, etc. (1917), 66 Ind. App. 48 , 117 N. E. 876 , the court, in discussing the right of a party to bring an action on a claim where there had been an allowance of the claim in a sum which was in fact intended only as a partial payment, and where the parties, at' the time of the allowance, entered into a supplemental agreement concerning the fi

11927–1927
Callahan v. Mayor neutral
nyctcompl · 1875
1 sentence

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

11924–1924
Perry v. Village of Cheboygan neutral
mich · 1884
2 sentences

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

11924–1924
Hubbell v. Rhinesmith & Simonson neutral
mich · 1891
1 sentence

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

11924–1924
Davey v. City of Big Rapids neutral
mich · 1891
1 sentence

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

11924–1924
Paulson v. County green
nd · 1912
2 sentences

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

11924–1924
Butler v. Board of Commissioners neutral
ind · 1912
1 sentence

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

11924–1924
Western Construction Co. v. Board of Commissioners green
ind · 1912
1 sentence

1924Butler v. Board, etc. (1912), 177 Ind. 440 ; Western, etc., Co. v. Board, etc. (1912), 178 Ind. 684 ; Perry v. Cheboygan (1884), 55 Mich. 250 , 21 N. W. 333 ; Davey v. Big Rapids (1891), 85 Mich. 56 , 48 N. W. 178 ; Callahan v. Mayor, etc. (1875), 6 Daly (N.Y.) 230 ; Paulson v. Ward County (1912), 23 N. D. 601 , 137 N. W. 486 , 42 L.

11924–1924
Dick v. Dumbauld neutral
· 1894
2 sentences

1922Dick v. Dumbauld (1894), 10 Ind. App. 508 , 38 N. E. 78 .

1922Dick v. Dumbauld (1894), 10 Ind. App. 508 , 38 N. E. 78 .

11922–1922
Guerin v. Kraner green
ind · 1884
1 sentence

1921Guerin v. Kraner, supra; Over v. Shannon, supra. Judgment reversed, with instructions to sustain appellant’s motion for a new trial and for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

11921–1921
Jackson v. Weaver neutral
ind · 1884
1 sentence

1921Cole v. Lafontaine (1882), 84 Ind. 446 ; Jackson v. Weaver (1884), 98 Ind. 307 .

11921–1921
Scherer v. Ingerman green
ind · 1887
2 sentences

1917Cole, Admr., v. Lafontaine (1882), 84 Ind. 446, 449 ; Scherer v. Ingerman, Admr. (1887), 110 Ind. 428, 437 , 11 N. E. 8 , 12 N. E. 304 ; O’Haleran v. O’Haleran (1888), 115 Ind. 493, 494 , 17 N. E. 917 .

1917Cole, Admr., v. Lafontaine (1882), 84 Ind. 446, 449 ; Scherer v. Ingerman, Admr. (1887), 110 Ind. 428, 437 , 11 N. E. 8 , 12 N. E. 304 ; O’Haleran v. O’Haleran (1888), 115 Ind. 493, 494 , 17 N. E. 917 .

11917–1917
O'Haleran v. O'Haleran neutral
ind · 1888
2 sentences

1917Cole, Admr., v. Lafontaine (1882), 84 Ind. 446, 449 ; Scherer v. Ingerman, Admr. (1887), 110 Ind. 428, 437 , 11 N. E. 8 , 12 N. E. 304 ; O’Haleran v. O’Haleran (1888), 115 Ind. 493, 494 , 17 N. E. 917 .

1917Cole, Admr., v. Lafontaine (1882), 84 Ind. 446, 449 ; Scherer v. Ingerman, Admr. (1887), 110 Ind. 428, 437 , 11 N. E. 8 , 12 N. E. 304 ; O’Haleran v. O’Haleran (1888), 115 Ind. 493, 494 , 17 N. E. 917 .

11917–1917
Hurley v. McIver green
ind · 1889
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Shafer v. Shafer green
ind · 1891
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Shipman v. Keys neutral
ind · 1891
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Boord v. Boord neutral
ind · 1904
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Bowman v. Olrick green
ind · 1905
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Young v. Biehl green
ind · 1906
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Snodgrass v. Meeks green
indctapp · 1894
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Whetsell v. Louden neutral
indctapp · 1900
2 sentences

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

1912Langley v. Mayhew, supra; Hurley v. McIver (1889), 119 Ind. 53, 54 , 21 N. E. 325 ; Shipman v. Keys (1891), 127 Ind. 353, 356 , 26 N. E. 896 ; Shafer v. Shafer (1892), 129 Ind. 394, 395 , 28 N. E. 867 ; Boord v. Boord (1904), 163 Ind. 307, 309 , 71 N. E. 891 ; Bowman v. Olrich (1905), 165 Ind. 478, 482 , 75 N. E. 820 ; Young v. Biehl (1906), 166 Ind. 357, 359 , 77 N. E. 406 ; Snodgrass v. Meeks (1895), 12 Ind. App. 70, 73 , 38 N. E. 833 ; Whetsel v. Louden (1900), 25 Ind. App. 257, 261 , 57 N. E. 952 .

11912–1912
Ray v. McGinnis neutral
ind · 1882
1 sentence

1909Ray v. McGinnis (1882), 81 Ind. 451 .

11909–1909
Gross v. Board of Commissioners green
ind · 1902
1 sentence

1909Gross v. Board,, etc. (1902), 158 Ind. 531 , 58 L.

11909–1909
Commissioners of Leavenworth County v. Keller green
· 1870
11900–1900
Abernathy v. . Phifer neutral
nc · 1881
1 sentence

1900Commissioners, etc., v. Keller, 6 Kan. 510 ; Board, etc., v. Catlett, 86 Va. 158 ; Abernathy v. Phifer, 84 N. C. 711 .

11900–1900
Board of Supervisors v. Catlett's Ex'ors neutral
· 1889
11900–1900
Myers v. Gibson green
· 1897
1 sentence

1900J., said: “It is settled law that a board of commissioners in this State Has no powers, except such as are expressly given by statute, and such as are necessary to the exercise of the powers expressly given; and the powers so given are limited and must be exercised in the manner provided by statute.” Citing, Myers v. Gibson, 147 Ind. 452 ; Board, etc., v. Pollard, 17 Ind. App. 470 .

11900–1900
Board of Commissioners v. Pollard neutral
indctapp · 1897
11900–1900
Blankenbaker v. Bank of Commerce green
ind · 1882
11891–1891

Where else courts name it

CA 62 (1885–2020) IL 60 (1865–2026) NY 48 (1870–2019) OH 34 (1897–2017) IA 29 (1873–1986) MO 28 (1884–2018) NE 26 (1891–1998) PA 25 (1883–2020) MA 22 (1889–2025) KS 18 (1889–1983) WA 17 (1895–2025) IN 15 (1891–1996) AL 14 (1852–1995) MI 14 (1889–2014) AR 12 (1909–1998) TX 12 (1908–2013) OR 9 (1882–1995) MN 9 (1879–1968) WI 8 (1891–1999) CO 8 (1909–2010) NJ 8 (1896–2021) NM 7 (1936–2008) OK 6 (1913–1967) MD 6 (1891–2010) AZ 5 (1934–2021) GA 5 (1927–2005) WY 5 (1905–1969) VT 5 (1877–1950) ND 5 (1941–2007) SD 5 (1910–1944) MS 4 (1896–1957) CT 4 (1894–1990) KY 4 (1900–2026) NV 4 (1881–1910) SC 4 (1889–2014) HI 4 (1911–1973) FL 3 (1954–2024) DE 3 (1946–1985) NC 2 (1881–1902) ID 2 (1923–2000) MT 2 (1894–1899) VA 2 (1928–1939) RI 2 (1902–1912) LA 2 (1989–2008) UT 2 (1919–1919)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check