14 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Taitgreen2 sentences2019Competency to stand trial and insanity at the time of the offense involve the defendant’s mental state at separate and distinct points in time.” Patton v. State, 784 So. 2d 380, 387 (Fla. 2000); see also State v. Tait, 387 So. 2d 338, 340-41 (Fla. 1980) (“The judge’s knowledge of results of examinations ordered in connection with the defendant’s reliance on the defense of insanity may or may not give rise to reasonable doubt of his competence to stand trial.”). 1984Here, none of the reports or testimony before the court before or during trial gave rise to reasonable ground to believe the defendant incompetent to stand trial. *765 Id. at 340-41 . | 1 | 2 |
Paul v. Stategreen1 sentence2020See Paul v. State, 129 So. 3d 1058, 1064 (Fla. 2013) (“[The] rule of lenity is a canon of last resort and only applies if the statute remains ambiguous after consulting traditional canons of statutory construction.”). | 1 | 1 |
Patton v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Competency to stand trial and insanity at the time of the offense involve the defendant’s mental state at separate and distinct points in time.” Patton v. State, 784 So. 2d 380, 387 (Fla. 2000); see also State v. Tait, 387 So. 2d 338, 340-41 (Fla. 1980) (“The judge’s knowledge of results of examinations ordered in connection with the defendant’s reliance on the defense of insanity may or may not give rise to reasonable doubt of his competence to stand trial.”). | 1 | 1 |
Newland v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Newland v. State, 117 So.3d 482, 484 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (holding that replacement cost evidence was insufficient where the owner of a stolen air conditioner did not provide any testimony of the cost to replace the stolen air conditioner unit with a similar unit about one to two years old). | 1 | 1 |
Morgan v. Canaveral Port Authoritygreen1 sentence1999See Morgan v. Canaveral Port Authority, 202 So.2d 884 (Fla. 4th DCA 1967). | 1 | 1 |
Kirksey v. Stategreen1 sentence1990See Kirksey v. State, 433 So.2d 1236, 1241 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983), review denied, 446 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1984). | 1 | 1 |
cluster 465247green1 sentence1987Compare Insurance Company of North America v. Bay, 784 F.2d 869 (8th Cir.1986) (party who was aware that final judgment had been entered against him could not reasonably rely on subsequent obviously mistaken trial court order setting case for trial as reason for delaying filing of notice of appeal). | 1 | 1 |
Doric Food Co. v. Allengreen1 sentence1983Martin Co., at 405, 406; see also Doric Food Co. v. Allen, 383 So.2d 316, 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.green1 sentence1982These factors were initially set forth in Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co., 96 F.2d 693, 704-05 (10th Cir.1938) (quoting Powell on Parent and Subsidiary Corporations), rev'd on other grounds, 306 U.S. 307 , 59 S.Ct. 543 , 83 L.Ed. 669 (1939). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Douglas v. State
green
1 sentence2008We are aware that the Second District Court of Appeal has reached contrary conclusions in Douglas v. State, 977 So.2d 776 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (noting the motion may be timely, but remanding for dismissal without prejudice due to the facial insufficiency of the motion); Boykins v. State, 976 So.2d 700 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (reversing denial of post-conviction relief based upon State's concession of error on issue of timeliness); and Beasley v. State, 958 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (reversing denial of post-conviction relief based upon state's concession of error on issue of timeliness). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Beasley v. State
green
1 sentence2008We are aware that the Second District Court of Appeal has reached contrary conclusions in Douglas v. State, 977 So.2d 776 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (noting the motion may be timely, but remanding for dismissal without prejudice due to the facial insufficiency of the motion); Boykins v. State, 976 So.2d 700 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (reversing denial of post-conviction relief based upon State's concession of error on issue of timeliness); and Beasley v. State, 958 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (reversing denial of post-conviction relief based upon state's concession of error on issue of timeliness). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Boykins v. State
green
1 sentence2008We are aware that the Second District Court of Appeal has reached contrary conclusions in Douglas v. State, 977 So.2d 776 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (noting the motion may be timely, but remanding for dismissal without prejudice due to the facial insufficiency of the motion); Boykins v. State, 976 So.2d 700 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (reversing denial of post-conviction relief based upon State's concession of error on issue of timeliness); and Beasley v. State, 958 So.2d 1086 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (reversing denial of post-conviction relief based upon state's concession of error on issue of timeliness). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Davis v. Powertel, Inc.
green
1 sentence2003They cite Davis v. Powertel, Inc., 776 So.2d 971 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000), rev. denied, 794 So.2d 605 (Fla.2001) in support of their argument that the trial court mistakenly applied a reliance standard when it determined that appellants failed to establish typicality. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Harp v. Hinckley
green
1 sentence1992Also, the dicta in Harp v. Hinckley, 410 So.2d 619 (Fla. 4th DCA1982), upon which the state relies was superseded by section 907.041, Florida Statutes (1991). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Wellcraft Marine Corp. v. Turner
green
1 sentence1989Citing Wellcraft Marine Corp. v. Turner, 435 So.2d 864 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) in support of their position, the e/c argue that the dc was correct in basing his finding of no causal connection in the instant dispute upon his earlier findings. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Gator Shoe Corp. v. Mungia
green
1 sentence1989Citing to Gator Shoe Corp. v. Mungia, 510 So.2d 1192 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), he also asserts error in the dc’s reliance on the doctrine of estoppel to deny the claim here in issue contending that estoppel does not apply to causal connection issues in successive wage loss claims. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.
green
2 sentences1982These factors were initially set forth in Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co., 96 F.2d 693, 704-05 (10th Cir.1938) (quoting Powell on Parent and Subsidiary Corporations), rev'd on other grounds, 306 U.S. 307 , 59 S.Ct. 543 , 83 L.Ed. 669 (1939). 1982These factors were initially set forth in Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co., 96 F.2d 693, 704-05 (10th Cir.1938) (quoting Powell on Parent and Subsidiary Corporations), rev'd on other grounds, 306 U.S. 307 , 59 S.Ct. 543 , 83 L.Ed. 669 (1939). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States
green
1 sentence1982The reliance on these factors by the factfinder in a federal bench trial was approved in Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States, 474 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam), aff'g 350 F. Supp. 420 (S.D.Tex. 1972), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1413 , 39 L.Ed.2d 471 (1974). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States
green
1 sentence1982The reliance on these factors by the factfinder in a federal bench trial was approved in Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States, 474 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam), aff'g 350 F. Supp. 420 (S.D.Tex. 1972), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1413 , 39 L.Ed.2d 471 (1974). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
DiVarco v. United States
green
1 sentence1982The reliance on these factors by the factfinder in a federal bench trial was approved in Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States, 474 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam), aff'g 350 F. Supp. 420 (S.D.Tex. 1972), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1413 , 39 L.Ed.2d 471 (1974). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Preux v. Immigration & Naturalization Service
green
1 sentence1982The reliance on these factors by the factfinder in a federal bench trial was approved in Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States, 474 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam), aff'g 350 F. Supp. 420 (S.D.Tex. 1972), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1413 , 39 L.Ed.2d 471 (1974). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Cylinder Gas, Chemical, Petroleum, Auto-Service & Accessory Drivers, Local No. 283 v. Ottawa Silica Co.
green
1 sentence1982The reliance on these factors by the factfinder in a federal bench trial was approved in Bay Sound Transportation Co. v. United States, 474 F.2d 1397 (5th Cir.1973) (per curiam), aff'g 350 F. Supp. 420 (S.D.Tex. 1972), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 916 , 94 S.Ct. 1413 , 39 L.Ed.2d 471 (1974). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc.
green
1 sentence1973The Judge of Industrial Claims relied upon the decision of this Court in Stephens v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 201 So.2d 731 (Fla. 1967), in holding that the Fund would reimburse the employer only for that amount that "[W]ould have been apportioned out of the claimant's award of compensation had it been an apportionment situation." The Industrial Relations Commission properly reversed the Judge of Industrial Claims on the reliance of this test, but failed to provide a proper test for the Judge to utilize on remand. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.