municipality violation (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

municipality violation in Ohio

14 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2024 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
City of Perrysburg v. Toledo Edison Co.green
ohioctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Perrysburg, 2007-Ohio-1327, at ¶ 18 (utility was not entitled to reimbursement from a municipality under the doctrine of eminent domain when forced to relocate its poles to make way for a highway-widening project); E.

11
Adams v. Peoplesgreen
ohio · 1985 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See Adams v. Peoples (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 140 , 18 OBR 200, 480 N.E.2d 428 .

1993See Adams v. Peoples (1985), 18 Ohio St.3d 140 , 18 OBR 200, 480 N.E.2d 428 .

11
Winwood v. City of Daytongreen
ohio · 1988 · cited in 1 Ohio opinions naming this issue, 1993–1993
2 sentences

1993See Winwood v. Dayton (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 282 , 525 N.E.2d 808 .

1993See Winwood v. Dayton (1988), 37 Ohio St.3d 282 , 525 N.E.2d 808 .

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

CaseCitedYears
Morgan v. City of Cincinnati green
ohio · 1986
2 sentences

1991The leading case on this issue, Morgan v. Cincinnati (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 285 , 25 OBR 337, 496 N.E.2d 468 , provides in its syllabus: “Where a civil service employee shows that a promotion to which he was entitled was delayed as the result of actions taken by a municipality in violation of R.C. 124.44, that employee is entitled to recover back pay and seniority for the period of the delay.

1991The leading case on this issue, Morgan v. Cincinnati (1986), 25 Ohio St.3d 285 , 25 OBR 337, 496 N.E.2d 468 , provides in its syllabus: “Where a civil service employee shows that a promotion to which he was entitled was delayed as the result of actions taken by a municipality in violation of R.C. 124.44, that employee is entitled to recover back pay and seniority for the period of the delay.

51988–1994
State ex rel. Gibbons v. City of Cleveland green
ohio · 1984
2 sentences

2020On appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, the Morgan court held that “where a civil service employee shows that a promotion to which he [or she] was entitled was delayed as the result of actions taken by a municipality in violation of R.C. 124.44, that employee is entitled to recover back pay and seniority for the period of delay.” Id. at 289 .

1988Thus, we hold that where a civil service employee shows that a promotion to which he was entitled was delayed as the result of actions taken by a municipality in violation of R.C. that employee is entitled to recover back pay and seniority for the period of the delay. ” (Emphasis added.) Id. at 289 , 25 OBR at 340, 496 N.E. 2d at 472 .

31988–2020
Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Cleveland green
ohioctapp · 2020
1 sentence

2021Cleveland Elec., 2020-Ohio-33 at ¶ 35 . {¶ 36} As noted above, the trial court dismissed Duke Energy's "artificial surplus" claim in accordance with Civ.R. 41(B)(2).

12021–2021
Firestone v. City of Cambridge green
· 1925
2 sentences

2020First, citing this court’s decision in Firestone v. Cambridge, 113 Ohio St. 57 , 148 N.E. 470 (1925), in which we held that “[n]o municipality in this state has power to levy [an] excise tax [upon owners of motor vehicles residing in the municipality for the privilege of operating the motor vehicles upon the streets, for the purpose of creating a fund to be used for cleaning, repairing, and maintaining the streets of the municipality] in addition to that levied by the state for similar purposes,” Mathys and Islander Inn argued that Section 858.01 is an impermissible tax under Article XVIII, Se

2020First, citing this court’s decision in Firestone v. Cambridge, 113 Ohio St. 57 , 148 N.E. 470 (1925), in which we held that “[n]o municipality in this state has power to levy [an] excise tax [upon owners of motor vehicles residing in the municipality for the privilege of operating the motor vehicles upon the streets, for the purpose of creating a fund to be used for cleaning, repairing, and maintaining the streets of the municipality] in addition to that levied by the state for similar purposes,” Mathys and Islander Inn argued that Section 858.01 is an impermissible tax under Article XVIII, Se

12020–2020
Strickland v. Washington green
scotus · 1984
2 sentences

2018Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687-688, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

2018Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668 , 687-688, 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984).

12018–2018
Cater v. City of Cleveland green
ohio · 1998
1 sentence

2014Id., citing Cater v. Cleveland, 83 Ohio St.3d 24 , 697 N.E.2d 610 (1998). 2007-Ohio-2070 , 865 N.E.2d 845, ¶ 10 .

12014–2014
Elston v. Howland Local Schools green
ohio · 2007
1 sentence

2014Id., citing Cater v. Cleveland, 83 Ohio St.3d 24 , 697 N.E.2d 610 (1998). 2007-Ohio-2070 , 865 N.E.2d 845, ¶ 10 .

12014–2014
DiGiorgio v. Cleveland green
ohioctapp · 2011
1 sentence

2014Id., citing Cater v. Cleveland, 83 Ohio St.3d 24 , 697 N.E.2d 610 (1998). 2007-Ohio-2070 , 865 N.E.2d 845, ¶ 10 .

12014–2014
Johnson v. Village of New London green
ohio · 1988
1 sentence

2002In Johnson v. New London (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 60 , the Supreme Court of Ohio held that R.C. 1533.181 provides a municipality with immunity from tort liability to a recreational user to the same extent the statute provides immunity to the owner of private land.

12002–2002
LiCause v. City of Canton green
ohio · 1989
1 sentence

2002"A person who enters or uses municipal land that is held open to the general public free of charge for recreational pursuit is a recreational user." LiCause v. Canton (1989), 42 Ohio St.3d 109 , syllabus.

12002–2002
Hungler v. City of Cincinnati green
ohio · 1986
2 sentences

1988On the same day that Morgan was announced, we decided Hungler v. Cincinnati (1986), 25 Ohio St. 3d 338 , 25 OBR 392, 496 N.E. 2d 912 .

1988On the same day that Morgan was announced, we decided Hungler v. Cincinnati (1986), 25 Ohio St. 3d 338 , 25 OBR 392, 496 N.E. 2d 912 .

11988–1988

Statutes the citing opinions construe

OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 124.44 (6) OH § Ohio Rev. Code § 124.37 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 71 (1904–2025) IL 38 (1906–2021) PA 20 (1954–2026) TX 19 (1940–2022) NJ 19 (1961–2025) OH 14 (1988–2024) WI 13 (1961–2025) ME 12 (1994–2023) CT 10 (1974–2005) AL 9 (1917–2017) AK 7 (1979–2025) CA 7 (1930–2022) FL 6 (1949–2004) OK 5 (1935–2003) MO 5 (1971–2023) MD 5 (1914–1997) IA 5 (1964–2017) NC 5 (2008–2016) MS 5 (1930–2015) MI 4 (1969–2012) GA 4 (1975–2018) SC 4 (1947–2002) IN 4 (1965–2015) RI 3 (1978–2001) WA 3 (1926–1983) VT 3 (2010–2024) LA 3 (1939–1959) AR 2 (1988–2025) KS 2 (1957–1969) NE 2 (1922–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check