13 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bridges v. Van Enterprisesgreen2 sentences2015See Bridges, 992 S.W.2d at 326-28 (affirming an apportionment of $2,000 to the death claim and $166,000 to the loss of consortium claim). 2015See Bridges, 992 S.W.2d at 326-28 (affirming an apportionment of $2,000 to the death claim and $166,000 to the loss of consortium claim). | 2 | 2 |
Simmons First National Bank v. Abbottgreen2 sentences2008See Simmons First Nat'l Bank v. Abbott, 288 Ark. 304 , 705 S.W.2d 3 (1986). [130] See also PROSSER & KEETON, The Law of Torts section 127, at 955 (5th ed.1988). 2008See Simmons First Nat'l Bank v. Abbott, 288 Ark. 304 , 705 S.W.2d 3 (1986). [130] See also PROSSER & KEETON, The Law of Torts section 127, at 955 (5th ed.1988). | 1 | 1 |
Brizendine v. Conradgreen1 sentence2007Brizendine v. Conrad, 71 S.W.3d 587, 590 (Mo. banc 2002) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tategreen1 sentence1988It went beyond recklessness. *681 Recently this district in State v. Tate, 733 S.W.2d 45, 47-49 (Mo.App.1987), discussed whether there was evidence of recklessness on the part of a defendant in causing a death such that an instruction on involuntary manslaughter should have been given. | 1 | 1 |
Ransom v. Adams Dairy Co.green1 sentence1987Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 460 S.W.2d 711, 718 (Mo.1970) (“In a death claim it is proper to show conditions such as health, earning capacity, age, and habits of the deceased.”); Ransom v. Adams Dairy Co., 684 S.W.2d 915, 917 (Mo.App.1985) (evidence of deceased’s acts of violence not erroneous in wrongful death action). | 1 | 1 |
Grothe v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.green1 sentence1987Louis-San Francisco Railway Co., 460 S.W.2d 711, 718 (Mo.1970) (“In a death claim it is proper to show conditions such as health, earning capacity, age, and habits of the deceased.”); Ransom v. Adams Dairy Co., 684 S.W.2d 915, 917 (Mo.App.1985) (evidence of deceased’s acts of violence not erroneous in wrongful death action). | 1 | 1 |
Morton v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co.green2 sentences1970Morton v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co., 280 Mo. 360 , 217 S.W. 831, 835-836 [9, 10]. 1970Morton v. Southwestern Telegraph & Telephone Co., 280 Mo. 360 , 217 S.W. 831, 835-836 [9, 10]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Livingston v. Omaha Property & Casualty Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1996After citing Famuliner and Elder, the court in Livingston said: To accept plaintiffs interpretation [of § 379.203], would permit plaintiff to recover under her uninsured motorist policy for the death of any person from whom she is legally entitled to bring a claim under the wrongful death statute, such as the death of her children, any lineal descendants, her brothers and sisters, her parents, or any other descendent. 927 S.W.2d at 446 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Walihan v. St. Louis-Clayton Orthopedic Group, Inc.
green
2 sentences1995Id. 1995Walihan, 849 S.W.2d at 181 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Newman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co.
green
2 sentences1991The employee testified that she did continue to work, although experiencing some problems, and it was not until September that the problems did become severe enough so that she began seeking medical attention.” (Emphasis added.) In its application for review, the employer alleged that the administrative law judge’s award was erroneous for several reasons, including: “(1) No notice of report of injury given to employer pursuant to § 287.420 RSMo without good cause prejudicing employer.” In Newman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., 335 Mo. 572 , 73 S.W.2d 264 (1934), a workers’ compensation proceeding 1991The employee testified that she did continue to work, although experiencing some problems, and it was not until September that the problems did become severe enough so that she began seeking medical attention.” (Emphasis added.) In its application for review, the employer alleged that the administrative law judge’s award was erroneous for several reasons, including: “(1) No notice of report of injury given to employer pursuant to § 287.420 RSMo without good cause prejudicing employer.” In Newman v. Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co., 335 Mo. 572 , 73 S.W.2d 264 (1934), a workers’ compensation proceeding | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Viselli v. Missouri Theatre Building Corp.
green
1 sentence1956The Viselli case, supra [ 361 Mo. 280 , 234 S.W.2d 566 ], involved a death claim under the Workmen’s Compensation Law arising out of the fall of a window washer, the employee of an independent contractor, against the appellant corporation as a statutory employer. | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Benson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
neutral
1 sentence1913Co., 198 Mo. l. c. 463: “. . . the question of false and fraudulent representations in securing such policy in an action to recover the amount of the death claim, must be governed by the provisions of section 7890, and as to whether the misrepresented matters in the application for insurance contributed to the happening of the contingency insured against, are questions of fact to be determined by the jury to whom' such facts are submitted.” In Benson v. Insurance Co., 161 Mo. App. 480 , we held that the evidence showed in law “that deceased died of the disease misrepresented,” but that ruling | 1 | 1913–1913 |
Parsons v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.
green
1 sentence1905In many claims arising on that statute the damage, from the nature of the case, is largely, if not altogether conjectural (Parsons v. Railway, 94 Mo. 286, 299 ). | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.