6 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1944–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Seagrave v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Cf. Seagrave v. State, 802 So.2d 281, 285, 291 (Fla. 2001) (stating that the question presented which was subsequently decided on the merits concerning how "sexual contact" should be interpreted for the imposition of victim-injury points was certified to this Court as a matter of great public importance ). | 1 | 1 |
May v. Illinois Nat. Ins. Co.green1 sentence2003The Creditor did not file her action against the Trustee until March 21, 2000, more than four years after the Decedent's death on May 15, 1995 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Spera v. State
green
1 sentence2008Because an opportunity to amend facially insufficient claims is required by Spera v. State, 971 So.2d 754 (Fla.2007), we reverse the trial court's denial of those claims which the court found to be facially insufficient, including the appellant's claims that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to interview all of the witnesses to the victim's death and that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to apprise him of significant information prior to the appellant entering his plea and receiving his sentence. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Hamilton v. Liberty National Life Insurance Co.
green
1 sentence1975Appellee refused to comply with either demand for payment, stating in a letter to appellant that “we are unable to pay benefits on the death claim on the above insured until such time as the designated beneficiary, Jimmy Lee Harrell, has been tried and it is determined whether he is held responsible for the felonious death of the insured.” Appellant, via her attorney, thereupon wrote appellee, remonstrating that the degree of proof in a civil action relative to an insurance claim is entirely different from that required in a criminal trial relative to an alleged felonious killing, citing Carte | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Carter v. Carter
green
1 sentence1975Appellee refused to comply with either demand for payment, stating in a letter to appellant that “we are unable to pay benefits on the death claim on the above insured until such time as the designated beneficiary, Jimmy Lee Harrell, has been tried and it is determined whether he is held responsible for the felonious death of the insured.” Appellant, via her attorney, thereupon wrote appellee, remonstrating that the degree of proof in a civil action relative to an insurance claim is entirely different from that required in a criminal trial relative to an alleged felonious killing, citing Carte | 1 | 1975–1975 |
Rigot v. Conda
neutral
2 sentences1966This question is wholly governed by the case of Kling v. Phayer, supra [ 130 Colo. 158 , 274 P.2d 97 ], which was followed in Rigot v. Conda, 134 Colo. 375 , 304 P.2d 629 . 1966This question is wholly governed by the case of Kling v. Phayer, supra [ 130 Colo. 158 , 274 P.2d 97 ], which was followed in Rigot v. Conda, 134 Colo. 375 , 304 P.2d 629 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Kling v. Phayer
neutral
2 sentences1966This question is wholly governed by the case of Kling v. Phayer, supra [ 130 Colo. 158 , 274 P.2d 97 ], which was followed in Rigot v. Conda, 134 Colo. 375 , 304 P.2d 629 . 1966This question is wholly governed by the case of Kling v. Phayer, supra [ 130 Colo. 158 , 274 P.2d 97 ], which was followed in Rigot v. Conda, 134 Colo. 375 , 304 P.2d 629 . | 1 | 1966–1966 |
Ed C. Wright & Co. v. Adkins
neutral
1 sentence1944We are of the opinion, therefore, that no violation of public policy has been made to appear (Wright & Co. v. Adkins [Fla.], 12 So. 2nd 296 ), and that the compensation carrier is entitled to a reasonable fee for the services of its attorney in pursuing the death claim to successful conclusion. | 1 | 1944–1944 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.