death claim in Alabama

5 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1917–2008 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
Ex Parte State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.green ala · 1980 · cited in 4 Alabama opinions naming this issue, 1992–2008 2 sentences 2008In Ex parte Alabama Department of Youth Services, 927 So.2d 805 , 808 (Ala.2005), this Court held that "[t]he question as to whether the investigative 226 reports are work-product when there are several motivating causes, other than anticipated litigation, for preparing them turns on whether it was reasonable ... to assume, in light of circumstances, that litigation could be expected." See also Ex parte State Farm, 386 So.2d at 1136 ("From the nature of the case, a death claim, State Farm's agent could have reasonably concluded that its insured would be sued. 2008In Ex parte Alabama Department of Youth Services , 927 So.2d 805 , 808 (Ala. 2005), this Court held that "[t]he question as to whether the investigative Page 226 reports are work-product when there are several motivating causes, other than anticipated litigation, for preparing them turns on whether it was reasonable . . . to assume, in light of circumstances, that litigation could be expected." See also Ex parte State Farm , 386 So.2d at 1136 ("From the nature of the case, a death claim, State Farm's agent could have reasonably concluded that its insured would be sued.	4	4

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Ex Parte Alabama Dept. of Youth Services green ala · 2005 2 sentences 2008In Ex parte Alabama Department of Youth Services, 927 So.2d 805 , 808 (Ala.2005), this Court held that "[t]he question as to whether the investigative 226 reports are work-product when there are several motivating causes, other than anticipated litigation, for preparing them turns on whether it was reasonable ... to assume, in light of circumstances, that litigation could be expected." See also Ex parte State Farm, 386 So.2d at 1136 ("From the nature of the case, a death claim, State Farm's agent could have reasonably concluded that its insured would be sued. 2008In Ex parte Alabama Department of Youth Services , 927 So.2d 805 , 808 (Ala. 2005), this Court held that "[t]he question as to whether the investigative Page 226 reports are work-product when there are several motivating causes, other than anticipated litigation, for preparing them turns on whether it was reasonable . . . to assume, in light of circumstances, that litigation could be expected." See also Ex parte State Farm , 386 So.2d at 1136 ("From the nature of the case, a death claim, State Farm's agent could have reasonably concluded that its insured would be sued.	1	2008–2008
McGhee v. State neutral · 1912 2 sentences 1917Watkins v. State, 89 Ala. 82 , 8 South. 134 ; Thomas v. State, 13 Ala. App. 50 , 69 South. 114 315; McGhee v. State, 178 Ala. 4 , 59 South. 573 . [3] The record recites that several special charges requested by the defendant “were all together in one document.” Some of them were charges on the doctrine of self-defense, and were for this and other reasons properly refused. 1917Watkins v. State, 89 Ala. 82 , 8 South. 134 ; Thomas v. State, 13 Ala. App. 50 , 69 South. 114 315; McGhee v. State, 178 Ala. 4 , 59 South. 573 . [3] The record recites that several special charges requested by the defendant “were all together in one document.” Some of them were charges on the doctrine of self-defense, and were for this and other reasons properly refused.	1	1917–1917
Watkins v. State green ala · 1889 1 sentence 1917Watkins v. State, 89 Ala. 82 , 8 South. 134 ; Thomas v. State, 13 Ala. App. 50 , 69 South. *114 315; McGhee v. State, 178 Ala. 4 , 59 South. 573 . [3] The record recites that several special charges requested by the defendant “were all together in one document.” Some of them were charges on the doctrine of self-defense, and were for this and other reasons properly refused.	1	1917–1917
Thomas v. State neutral alactapp · 1915 1 sentence 1917Watkins v. State, 89 Ala. 82 , 8 South. 134 ; Thomas v. State, 13 Ala. App. 50 , 69 South. *114 315; McGhee v. State, 178 Ala. 4 , 59 South. 573 . [3] The record recites that several special charges requested by the defendant “were all together in one document.” Some of them were charges on the doctrine of self-defense, and were for this and other reasons properly refused.	1	1917–1917

Where else courts name it

NY 26 (1889–2023) TX 16 (1924–2015) OH 13 (1932–2017) MO 13 (1905–2015) LA 10 (1977–2010) PA 10 (1936–2000) NJ 10 (1954–2010) IL 8 (1902–1995) KS 7 (1914–2002) VA 7 (1968–2011) FL 6 (1944–2008) GA 6 (1923–2008) CA 5 (1938–2024) NE 5 (1911–1989) AZ 5 (1965–2023) AL 5 (1917–2008) WA 4 (1922–2006) TN 4 (1917–2004) OR 4 (1976–1980) AR 3 (1935–2001) OK 3 (1955–2004) MD 3 (1931–1996) RI 3 (2001–2008) ID 3 (2018–2020) MA 2 (1962–1967) NC 2 (1906–2025) WV 2 (1917–1982) SC 2 (1996–2001) IA 2 (1968–1982) CO 2 (1957–1959) ME 2 (2018–2018) MS 2 (1968–1968)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check