Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2011–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Petrollgreen2 sentences2019See Commonwealth v. Powell, 956 A.2d 406, 423 (Pa. 2008) (finding claim that an autopsy photograph was unduly prejudicial waived “[b]ecause the record does not contain the photograph appellant refers to, we cannot assess his description and claim”); Petroll, 696 A.2d at 836 (finding claim of improperly admitted photographs waived where they were not in the certified record). 2019See Commonwealth v. Powell, 956 A.2d 406, 423 (Pa. 2008) (finding claim that an autopsy photograph was unduly prejudicial waived “[b]ecause the record does not contain the photograph appellant refers to, we cannot assess his description and claim”); Petroll, 696 A.2d at 836 (finding claim of improperly admitted photographs waived where they were not in the certified record). | 2 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. Powellgreen2 sentences2019See Commonwealth v. Powell, 956 A.2d 406, 423 (Pa. 2008) (finding claim that an autopsy photograph was unduly prejudicial waived “[b]ecause the record does not contain the photograph appellant refers to, we cannot assess his description and claim”); Petroll, 696 A.2d at 836 (finding claim of improperly admitted photographs waived where they were not in the certified record). 2019See Commonwealth v. Powell, 956 A.2d 406, 423 (Pa. 2008) (finding claim that an autopsy photograph was unduly prejudicial waived “[b]ecause the record does not contain the photograph appellant refers to, we cannot assess his description and claim”); Petroll, 696 A.2d at 836 (finding claim of improperly admitted photographs waived where they were not in the certified record). | 2 | 2 |
Com. v. Salter, D.green1 sentence2026See Commonwealth v. Salter, 290 A.3d 741, 748 (Pa. Super. 2023). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Springergreen1 sentence2025See Springer, 961 A.2d at 1264 ; Wah, 42 A.3d at 338 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Westgreen1 sentence2024See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 803 A.2d 1291, 1293 (Pa. Super. 2002) (“[T]he PCRA provides the sole means for obtaining collateral review, and … any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition”) (citation omitted); see also Commonwealth v. West, 938 A.2d 1034, 1043 (Pa. 2007) (stating the PCRA incorporates the remedy of habeas corpus if the Act offers the petitioner a remedy). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2024See Commonwealth v. Johnson, 803 A.2d 1291, 1293 (Pa. Super. 2002) (“[T]he PCRA provides the sole means for obtaining collateral review, and … any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition”) (citation omitted); see also Commonwealth v. West, 938 A.2d 1034, 1043 (Pa. 2007) (stating the PCRA incorporates the remedy of habeas corpus if the Act offers the petitioner a remedy). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Johnsongreen1 sentence2022See Johnson, 985 A.2d at 924 .5 In his final claim, Wilson contends that counsel was ineffective for failing to cross-examine and impeach Bain during the preliminary hearing based upon several omissions and contradictions between his statements to the police and ____________________________________________ 4 Nonetheless, Wilson’s underlying ineffectiveness claim is without merit. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Spotzgreen1 sentence2022It is well-settled that “no Brady violation occurs where the parties had equal access to the information or if the defendant knew or could have uncovered such evidence with reasonable diligence.” Commonwealth v. Spotz, 896 A.2d 1191, 1248 (Pa. 2006) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Martzgreen1 sentence2022See Commonwealth v. Martz, 42 A.3d 1142, 1145 (Pa.Super. 2012). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Houtzgreen1 sentence2020See Commonwealth v. Houtz, 982 A.2d 537, 537 (Pa. Super. 2009) (stating that an appellant’s claim that a condition of probation is “unduly restrictive and/or incompatible with [his] freedom of conscience” is an appeal from the judgment of sentence that imposed said condition). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Crumpgreen1 sentence2020See Commonwealth v. Crump, 995 A.2d 1280, 1282 (Pa. Super. 2010) (stating that “[t]he imposition of a sentence of total confinement after the revocation of probation for a technical violation, and not a new criminal offense, implicates the fundamental norms which underlie the sentencing process.”). | 1 | 1 |
Underwood Ex Rel. Underwood v. Windgreen1 sentence2019See Underwood, supra. Accordingly, we reject Appellants’ first claim. ____________________________________________ 8 In Appellants’ reply brief, they contend that “[b]y rejecting Wilson’s claim that the Agreement was a partnership, the jury necessarily found that the Agreement was terminable at-will and denied Wilson any recovery for breach of contract.” Appellants’ Reply Brief at 6-7. | 1 | 1 |
Lobalzo v. Varoligreen1 sentence2018Herein, in granting Mrs. Wilson’s motion for a new trial, the trial court characterized defense counsel’s misconduct as so consequential that, “like a dash of ink in a can of milk, it cannot be strained out[.]” Trial Court Opinion, 10/31/16, at 31 (quoting Lobalzo v. Varoli, 185 A.2d 557, 561 (Pa. 1962) -6- J-A22008-17 (ordering a new trial as it was impossible to measure impact of erroneously admitted evidence of plaintiff’s receipt of workers’ and unemployment compensation and misleading jury charge on the verdict)). | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Stanleygreen1 sentence2016Wilson points out that, in the trial court’s Opinion, it determined that Wilson’s claim lacks merit based upon the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s Opinion in Commonwealth v. Stanley, 446 A.2d 583, 588 (Pa. 1982) (holding that the Commonwealth may use any proper evidence to prove its case, and it does not have to accept a defendant’s stipulations). | 1 | 1 |
Com. v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2011See Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 672 (Pa.Super.2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010). [7] 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9754(b) (statutory provision permitting court to attach reasonable, specified conditions found in section 9754(c) to a probation order "as it deems necessary to insure or assist the defendant in leading a law-abiding life."). [8] 61 P.S. § 331.27b, which was repealed in October 2009, was in effect at the time that Alexander was sentenced on August 15, 2008. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2011See Commonwealth v. Williams, 980 A.2d 667, 672 (Pa.Super.2009), appeal denied, 605 Pa. 700 , 990 A.2d 730 (2010). [7] 42 Pa.C.S.A. § 9754(b) (statutory provision permitting court to attach reasonable, specified conditions found in section 9754(c) to a probation order "as it deems necessary to insure or assist the defendant in leading a law-abiding life."). [8] 61 P.S. § 331.27b, which was repealed in October 2009, was in effect at the time that Alexander was sentenced on August 15, 2008. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Wah
green
1 sentence2025See Springer, 961 A.2d at 1264 ; Wah, 42 A.3d at 338 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
1 sentence2022Moreover, Wilson’s brief provides no discussion ____________________________________________ 2In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), the Supreme Court of the United States held that prosecutors have a duty to disclose exculpatory evidence in the prosecutor’s possession to defendants. -6- of when he learned of Matteson’s prior conviction or why he could not have raised the issue earlier. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Johnson v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole
green
1 sentence2020Relative to Wilson’s challenge to the sufficiency of the Board’s reason for denying him credit for time spent in good standing on parole, this Court has explained: Pittman requires the Board to articulate a reason for exercising its discretion to deny credit for street time because ‘an appellate court hearing the matter must have [a] method to assess the Board’s exercise of discretion.’ Id. at 7 The Smoak Court held: [T]his matter does not need to be remanded to the [] Board to correct the error [of the Board’s failure to record any reason for its decision to deny the parolee street time credi | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Pittman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
green
1 sentence2020Regarding Wilson’s claim that the Board erred by failing to reference the reason it denied him street time credit in its June 21, 2019 recommitment order, this Court acknowledges the Pittman Court specified that “the Board must provide a contemporaneous statement explaining its reason for denying a CPV credit for time spent at liberty on parole.” Pittman, 159 A.3d at 475 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Folk v. Atty. Gen. of Commonwealth of Pa.
green
1 sentence2016An inmate has no liberty interest in being paroled, Weaver, in not being labeled a sex offender, or in not being required to participate in sex offender programming, Folk v. [Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania], 425 F.Supp. 2d 663 (W.D. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.