Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1982–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Blakely v. Washingtongreen1 sentence2026See Flournoy v. State, 415 So. 3d 806 , 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025) ("Florida courts have recognized that the types of errors addressed in Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)], Blakely [v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004)], and Alleyne [v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013),] are subject to harmless error review. | 1 | 1 |
Alleyne v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2026See Flournoy v. State, 415 So. 3d 806 , 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025) ("Florida courts have recognized that the types of errors addressed in Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)], Blakely [v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004)], and Alleyne [v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013),] are subject to harmless error review. | 1 | 1 |
Apprendi v. New Jerseygreen1 sentence2026See Flournoy v. State, 415 So. 3d 806 , 808 (Fla. 2d DCA 2025) ("Florida courts have recognized that the types of errors addressed in Apprendi [v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000)], Blakely [v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004)], and Alleyne [v. United States, 570 U.S. 99 (2013),] are subject to harmless error review. | 1 | 1 |
Rodrick D. Williams v. State of Floridagreen2 sentences2023Williams v. State, 242 So. 3d 280, 290 (Fla. 2018). 2023See Williams, 242 So. 3d at 290 . | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Daniel I. Colton, United States of America v. Daniel I. Coltongreen1 sentence2015The resulting principle is that “[although silence as to a material fact (nondisclosure), without an independent disclosure duty, usually does not give rise to an action for fraud, suppression of the truth with the intent to deceive (concealment) does.” Steffen, 687 F.3d at 1114 (quoting United States v. Colton, 231 F.3d 890, 898-99 (4th Cir.2000)). | 1 | 1 |
ABAMAR HOUSING & DEVELOPMENT INC. v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor, Inc.green1 sentence2012See Abamar Hous. & Dev., Inc. v. Lisa Daly Lady Decor, Inc., 724 So.2d 572, 573 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998) (“Abamar II”). | 1 | 1 |
Gardner v. Stategreen1 sentence2009As a general proposition, “the right to present evidence on one’s own behalf is a fundamental right basic to our adversary system of criminal justice, and is a part of the ‘due process of law’ that is guaranteed to defendants in state criminal courts by the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution.” Gardner v. State, 530 So.2d 404, 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. DiGuiliogreen1 sentence1999See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). | 1 | 1 |
Oswald v. Diamondgreen1 sentence1996Further, "mere allegations of mental or emotional instability are insufficient to place the custodial parent's mental health at issue so as to overcome the privilege." Oswald v. Diamond, 576 So.2d 909, 910 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
United States v. John Steffen
green
1 sentence2015The resulting principle is that “[although silence as to a material fact (nondisclosure), without an independent disclosure duty, usually does not give rise to an action for fraud, suppression of the truth with the intent to deceive (concealment) does.” Steffen, 687 F.3d at 1114 (quoting United States v. Colton, 231 F.3d 890, 898-99 (4th Cir.2000)). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Nelson
green
1 sentence2011As the Court emphasized in Nelson , “[A] defendant has a right to speedy trial, not a right to speedy discharge without trial.” 26 So.3d at 576 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Ramirez v. State
green
1 sentence2011Id. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Faretta v. California
green
2 sentences2009As a general proposition, “the right to present evidence on one’s own behalf is a fundamental right basic to our adversary system of criminal justice, and is a part of the ‘due process of law’ that is guaranteed to defendants in state criminal courts by the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution.” Gardner v. State, 530 So.2d 404, 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973)). 2009As a general proposition, “the right to present evidence on one’s own behalf is a fundamental right basic to our adversary system of criminal justice, and is a part of the ‘due process of law’ that is guaranteed to defendants in state criminal courts by the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution.” Gardner v. State, 530 So.2d 404, 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Chambers v. Mississippi
green
2 sentences2009As a general proposition, “the right to present evidence on one’s own behalf is a fundamental right basic to our adversary system of criminal justice, and is a part of the ‘due process of law’ that is guaranteed to defendants in state criminal courts by the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution.” Gardner v. State, 530 So.2d 404, 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973)). 2009As a general proposition, “the right to present evidence on one’s own behalf is a fundamental right basic to our adversary system of criminal justice, and is a part of the ‘due process of law’ that is guaranteed to defendants in state criminal courts by the Fourteenth Amendment to the federal constitution.” Gardner v. State, 530 So.2d 404, 405 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (citing Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 , 95 S.Ct. 2525 , 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), and Chambers v. Mississippi, 410 U.S. 284 , 93 S.Ct. 1038 , 35 L.Ed.2d 297 (1973)). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Anders v. California
green
2 sentences2003Counsel filed briefs asserting no meritorious argument pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). 2003Counsel filed briefs asserting no meritorious argument pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Tampa Maid Seafood Products v. Porter
green
1 sentence1985Tampa Maid Seafood Products v. Porter, 415 So.2d 883 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982). | 1 | 1985–1985 |
In Re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure
green
1 sentence1982Notwithstanding these principles, the state judiciary, in emergency session, undertook this legislative direction to take legislative and executive action, see In re Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, 245 So.2d 33 (Fla. 1971), and defended the resulting rule as merely providing procedures to enforce the constitutional right to a speedy trial. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.