Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1908–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Petrovich v. Share Health Plan of Illinois, Inc.green2 sentences2004See Petrovich v. Share Health Plan of Illinois, Inc., 188 Ill. 2d 17, 31 (1999) (“[a]s a general rule, no vicarious liability exists for the actions of independent contractors. 2004Petrovich v. Share Health Plan of Illinois, Inc., 188 Ill. 2d 17, 31 (1999) (“As a general rule, no vicarious liability exists for the actions of independent contractors. | 2 | 2 |
Jack Bradley, Inc. v. Department of Employment Securitygreen2 sentences2002Jack Bradley, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security, 146 Ill. 2d 61, 75 (1991). 2002Jack Bradley, Inc. v. Department of Employment Security , 146 Ill. 2d 61, 75 (1991). | 2 | 2 |
Sacramento Crushing Corp. v. Correct/All Sewer, Inc.green1 sentence2025See Sacramento Crushing Corp., 318 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc.green1 sentence2025See Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc., 169 Ill. 2d 525, 536 (1996) (“It is well settled that issues not raised in the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.”); Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC, 2016 IL App (1st) 142754 , ¶ 81 (“[O]ur function is to review rulings and judgments of the circuit courts and generally we will not pass on any question as to which the circuit court failed to make a decision.”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pepper Construction Company v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC
green
1 sentence2025See Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc., 169 Ill. 2d 525, 536 (1996) (“It is well settled that issues not raised in the trial court are deemed waived and may not be raised for the first time on appeal.”); Pepper Construction Co. v. Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC, 2016 IL App (1st) 142754 , ¶ 81 (“[O]ur function is to review rulings and judgments of the circuit courts and generally we will not pass on any question as to which the circuit court failed to make a decision.”). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Lawlor v. North American Corporation of Illinois
green
1 sentence2012Lawlor, 2012 IL 112530, ¶ 43 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
green
1 sentence2009Carpetland, 201 Ill. 2d at 386-87 . | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Myers v. Cummins, Director of Labor
neutral
2 sentences1999In discussing their respective positions, both parties have directed us to a number of the same cases (e.g., Parks Cab Co., 412 Ill. 549 , 107 N.E.2d 853 ; Myers v. Cummins, 9 Ill. 2d 582 , 138 N.E.2d 491 (1956); Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly, 30 Ill. 2d 465 , 197 N.E.2d 3 (1964); O’Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker, 232 Ill. 1999In discussing their respective positions, both parties have directed us to a number of the same cases (e.g., Parks Cab Co., 412 Ill. 549 , 107 N.E.2d 853 ; Myers v. Cummins, 9 Ill. 2d 582 , 138 N.E.2d 491 (1956); Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly, 30 Ill. 2d 465 , 197 N.E.2d 3 (1964); O’Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker, 232 Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
O'Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker
green
1 sentence1999In discussing their respective positions, both parties have directed us to a number of the same cases (e.g., Parks Cab Co., 412 Ill. 549 , 107 N.E.2d 853 ; Myers v. Cummins, 9 Ill. 2d 582 , 138 N.E.2d 491 (1956); Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly, 30 Ill. 2d 465 , 197 N.E.2d 3 (1964); O’Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker, 232 Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly
green
2 sentences1999In discussing their respective positions, both parties have directed us to a number of the same cases (e.g., Parks Cab Co., 412 Ill. 549 , 107 N.E.2d 853 ; Myers v. Cummins, 9 Ill. 2d 582 , 138 N.E.2d 491 (1956); Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly, 30 Ill. 2d 465 , 197 N.E.2d 3 (1964); O’Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker, 232 Ill. 1999In discussing their respective positions, both parties have directed us to a number of the same cases (e.g., Parks Cab Co., 412 Ill. 549 , 107 N.E.2d 853 ; Myers v. Cummins, 9 Ill. 2d 582 , 138 N.E.2d 491 (1956); Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly, 30 Ill. 2d 465 , 197 N.E.2d 3 (1964); O’Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker, 232 Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Parks Cab Co. v. Annunzio
green
2 sentences1999In discussing their respective positions, both parties have directed us to a number of the same cases (e.g., Parks Cab Co., 412 Ill. 549 , 107 N.E.2d 853 ; Myers v. Cummins, 9 Ill. 2d 582 , 138 N.E.2d 491 (1956); Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly, 30 Ill. 2d 465 , 197 N.E.2d 3 (1964); O’Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker, 232 Ill. 1999In discussing their respective positions, both parties have directed us to a number of the same cases (e.g., Parks Cab Co., 412 Ill. 549 , 107 N.E.2d 853 ; Myers v. Cummins, 9 Ill. 2d 582 , 138 N.E.2d 491 (1956); Gladstone Cab Co. v. Donnelly, 30 Ill. 2d 465 , 197 N.E.2d 3 (1964); O’Hare-Midway Limousine Service, Inc. v. Baker, 232 Ill. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Ahmer v. Peters
green
1 sentence1979(See Ahmer v. Peters (1958), 17 Ill. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Ozark Minerals Co. v. Murphy
green
1 sentence1946While, under the conditions specified in the contractor clause of section 2(d), the employees of an independent contractor or subcontractor may be regarded, for the purposes of the act, as employees of the employing unit, as we said in Ozark Minerals Co. v. Murphy, 384 Ill. 94 , nowhere does the act declare that an independent contractor or subcontractor may be considered an employee of the employing unit. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
New York Life Insurance v. Murphy
green
1 sentence1946Co. v. Murphy, 388 Ill. 316 .) This provision has no application .to this case. | 1 | 1946–1946 |
Butler & McCracken v. Gain
neutral
1 sentence1913In the ease of Butler v. Gain, 128 Ill. 23 , it was held that a payment of the original contractor is in violation of the interests and rights of the subcontractor or person furnishing materials, when the owner has notice of such person’s rights, either under section 30, or from the sworn statement of the original contractor provided by section 35. | 1 | 1913–1913 |
City of East St. Louis v. Murphy
neutral
1 sentence1908Louis v. Murphy, 89 Ill. | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.