expert analysis in Louisiana

12 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

Case	Followed	Cited
State v. Parkergreen la · 1982 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–2019 2 sentences 2019They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered (See, State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d 770, 774 (La. 1981)); whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime (See, State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La. 1983); Claibon, supra); to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant (See, State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La. 1982)); to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis (See, State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570, 1994Factors pertinent to the review of expert testimony, as set forth by this Court, include: ... whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis i	4	4
State v. Noblegreen la · 1983 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–2019 2 sentences 2019They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered (See, State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d 770, 774 (La. 1981)); whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime (See, State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La. 1983); Claibon, supra); to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant (See, State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La. 1982)); to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis (See, State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570, 1994Factors pertinent to the review of expert testimony, as set forth by this Court, include: ... whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis i	4	4
State v. Guidrygreen lactapp · 1984 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–2019 2 sentences 1994Factors pertinent to the review of expert testimony, as set forth by this Court, include: ... whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis i 1993They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon , 395 at 774), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon , 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570, 576 , (La.App	4	4
State v. Nealygreen la · 1984 · cited in 3 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–1994 2 sentences 1994State v. Nealy, 450 So.2d 634, 639 (La.1984). 1989As revealed in prior cases grappling with this topic, they include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, supra, at 774 ; State v. Roy, supra, at 669 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, supra ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis is controverte	3	3
State v. Heathgreen lactapp · 1984 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–2019 2 sentences 2019They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered (See, State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d 770, 774 (La. 1981)); whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime (See, State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La. 1983); Claibon, supra); to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant (See, State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La. 1982)); to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis (See, State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570, 1994Factors pertinent to the review of expert testimony, as set forth by this Court, include: ... whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis i	2	4
State v. Claibongreen la · 1981 · cited in 4 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1989–2019 2 sentences 2019They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered (See, State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d 770, 774 (La. 1981)); whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime (See, State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La. 1983); Claibon, supra); to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant (See, State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La. 1982)); to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis (See, State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570, 2019They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered (See, State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d 770, 774 (La. 1981)); whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime (See, State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La. 1983); Claibon, supra); to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant (See, State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La. 1982)); to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis (See, State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570,	1	4
State v. Catheygreen lactapp · 1986 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016 1 sentence 2016See Cathey, supra. In light of the foregoing, we find that a rational trier of fact could have found that the evidence was sufficient under the Jackson standard to support the convictions.	1	1
Scarberry v. Entergy Corp.green lactapp · 2014 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 1 sentence 2015“Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.” Adams , 07-2110, p. 6, 983 So.2d at 804 ; see also Scarberry, 13-0214, p. 12, 136 So.3d at 205 .	1	1
State v. Hodgesgreen lactapp · 1988 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1991–1991 2 sentences 1991See, State v. Hodges, supra. A review of the testimony on direct and cross-examination reveals that the trial judge did not commit error in recognizing Damon Beyeaux as an expert in the analysis and identification of cocaine. 1991See, State v. Hodges, supra. A review of the testimony on direct and cross-examination reveals that the trial judge did not commit error in recognizing Damon Beyeaux as an expert in the analysis and identification of cocaine.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
Darville v. Texaco, Inc. green la · 1984 2 sentences 1994Factors pertinent to the review of expert testimony, as set forth by this Court, include: ... whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis i 1993They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon , 395 at 774), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon , 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570, 576 , (La.App	3	1993–2019
STATE EX REL. GUIDRY v. State neutral la · 1985 2 sentences 1994Factors pertinent to the review of expert testimony, as set forth by this Court, include: ... whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis i 1993They include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon , 395 at 774), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime ( State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon , 395 So.2d at 774 ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis is controverted by other expert analysis ( State v. Heath, 447 So.2d 570, 576 , (La.App	3	1989–1994
Leyva v. Iberia General Hosp. green la · 1994 2 sentences 2014In Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, supra, the Louisiana Supreme Court found that a board certified obstetrical surgeon was qualified to testify as an expert as to the standard of care applicable to a general practitioner from a different locale who performed a tubal ligation. 2001In Leyva v. Iberia General Hospital, 94-0795 (La.10/17/94), 643 So.2d 1236 , the Louisiana Supreme Court considered whether a board certified obstetrical surgeon was qualified to testify as an expert as to the standard of care applicable to a general practitioner from a different locale who performed a tubal ligation.	2	2001–2014
Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc. green la · 1992 2 sentences 2014Leyva, 643 So.2d at 1239 (citing Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc., 601 So.2d 1378 (La.1992)). 2001The Court concluded that "[w]here there is a uniform nationwide method for performing a particular medical procedure, an expert having knowledge of such method is qualified to testify, and that the testifying expert in this circumstance is not constrained by the need to have practiced in a similar community or locale and under similar circumstances." Leyva, 94-0795, 643 So.2d at 1239 (citing Piazza v. Behrman Chiropractic Clinic, Inc., 601 So.2d 1378 (La. 1992)).	2	2001–2014
MB Industries, LLC v. CNA Insurance Co. green la · 2011 1 sentence 2021Pursuant to the requirement for expert testimony in legal malpractice matters as discussed in MB Industries, LLC, 74 So. 3d at 1185 , we find no abuse of discretion in the trial court' s ruling on allowing the expert testimony in this case.	1	2021–2021
Adams v. Rhodia, Inc. green la · 2008 1 sentence 2015“Louisiana jurisprudence is well established that an appellate court must exercise great restraint before it reverses a jury verdict because of erroneous jury instructions.” Adams , 07-2110, p. 6, 983 So.2d at 804 ; see also Scarberry, 13-0214, p. 12, 136 So.3d at 205 .	1	2015–2015
State v. Sherer green la · 1982 2 sentences 2004State v. Sherer, 411 So.2d 1050 (La.1982); State v. Honeyman, 565 So.2d 961 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990). 2004State v. Sherer, 411 So.2d 1050 (La.1982); State v. Honeyman, 565 So.2d 961 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990).	1	2004–2004
State v. Honeyman green lactapp · 1990 2 sentences 2004State v. Sherer, 411 So.2d 1050 (La.1982); State v. Honeyman, 565 So.2d 961 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990). 2004State v. Sherer, 411 So.2d 1050 (La.1982); State v. Honeyman, 565 So.2d 961 (La.App. 2d Cir.1990).	1	2004–2004
Palacios v. Louisiana and Delta RR Inc. green la · 1999 1 sentence 2003Cooper refers to Palacios v. Louisiana and Delta R.R., Inc., 98-2932 (La.7/2/99), 740 So.2d 95 and Sevario v. State ex rel.	1	2003–2003
State v. Roy green la · 1981 1 sentence 1989As revealed in prior cases grappling with this topic, they include whether lay testimony controverting the expert opinion was offered ( State v. Claibon, supra, at 774 ; State v. Roy, supra, at 669 ), whether the experts specifically concluded that the defendant could not discern between right and wrong at the time of the crime State v. Noble, 425 So.2d 734, 737 (La.1983); State v. Claibon, supra ), to what extent the expert testimony was premised on the self-serving revelations of the defendant ( State v. Parker, 416 So.2d 545, 551 (La.1982)), to what extent the expert analysis is controverte	1	1989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 14:14 (4) LA § La. Rev. Stat. § 15:432 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 59 (1993–2026) IL 44 (1979–2025) CA 37 (1948–2025) GA 30 (1976–2024) NY 25 (1965–2025) OH 21 (1986–2025) PA 21 (1976–2026) NJ 17 (1951–2026) MD 15 (1962–2025) AL 14 (1975–2002) UT 12 (1987–2025) WA 12 (1989–2019) FL 12 (1990–2019) LA 12 (1989–2021) CT 11 (1970–2025) MI 11 (2014–2026) VA 11 (1981–2026) KS 8 (1936–2021) WV 7 (1991–2024) NC 7 (1984–2021) WI 6 (1999–2022) AZ 6 (2005–2022) MS 6 (1986–2020) DC 5 (1997–2009) SC 5 (1987–2025) IA 5 (1976–2017) TN 4 (2004–2025) KY 4 (2003–2017) CO 4 (1984–2025) MT 4 (2002–2020) MN 4 (2003–2024) OK 4 (2001–2026) SD 4 (1980–2014) VT 3 (2010–2016) NV 3 (2007–2021) NH 3 (1998–2024) OR 3 (1988–2013) MO 3 (1985–2015) ND 3 (1979–2007) NE 2 (2015–2025) NM 2 (2011–2014) AR 2 (1989–2025) DE 2 (2001–2025) WY 2 (1981–2001) RI 2 (1988–2002) IN 2 (1982–1990) MA 2 (2016–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check