Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texaco Inc. v. Daghergreen2 sentences2017Under a per se violation, an agreement is “so plainly anticompetitive that no elaborate study of the industry is needed to establish ... illegality.” Id. at 568 (quoting Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1, 5 , 126 S.Ct. 1276, 1279 , 164 L.Ed.2d 1, 7 (2006)). 2017Under a per se violation, an agreement is “so plainly anticompetitive that no elaborate study of the industry is needed to establish ... illegality.” Id. at 568 (quoting Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1, 5 , 126 S.Ct. 1276, 1279 , 164 L.Ed.2d 1, 7 (2006)). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Rezulin Products Liability Litigationgreen1 sentence2010See In re Rezulin, 369 F. Supp. 2d at 425–26. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Amended June 5, 2015 Steven A. Mueller, Bradley J. Brown, Mark A. Kruse, Kevin D. Miller, and Larry E. Phipps, on Behalf of Themselves and Those Like Situated v. Wellmark, Inc. D/B/A Wellmark Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Iowa, an Iowa Corporation, and Wellmark Health Plan of Iowa, Inc., an Iowa Corporation
green
2 sentences2017Under a per se violation, an agreement is “so plainly anticompetitive that no elaborate study of the industry is needed to establish . . . illegality.” Id. at 568 (quoting Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1, 5 , 126 S. Ct. 1276, 1279 , 164 L. 2017Under a per se violation, an agreement is “so plainly anticompetitive that no elaborate study of the industry is needed to establish ... illegality.” Id. at 568 (quoting Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1, 5 , 126 S.Ct. 1276, 1279 , 164 L.Ed.2d 1, 7 (2006)). | 2 | 2017–2017 |
The Estate of Deanna Dee Fahrmann, by Jeffrey A. Fahrmann, Dennis C. Fahrmann, by and through his Power of Attorney, Jeffrey A. Fahrmann, Jeffrey A. Fahrmann, and Amy J. Fahrmann v. ABCM Corporation, Kathy Meyer-Allbee, and Linsey Henry
green
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Hutchison v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences1997Hutchison, 514 N.W.2d at 889 . 1997Hutchison, 514 N.W.2d at 889 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Hancock
green
1 sentence1976Id. at 333 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.