condition violation (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

condition violation in New Jersey

12 New Jersey opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2025 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Polzo v. County of Essexgreen
nj · 2008 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
1 sentence

2025A public entity "shall be deemed to have constructive notice of a dangerous condition of property 'only if the plaintiff establishes that the condition had existed for such a period of time and was of such an obvious nature that the public entity, in the exercise of due care, should have discovered the condition and its dangerous character.'" Polzo v. Cty. of Essex, 196 N.J. 569, 585 (2008) (quoting N.J.S.A. 59:4-3(b)).

11
George C. Riley v. New Jersey State Parole Board (069327)green
nj · 2014 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016See Riley, supra, 219 N.J. at 295 . 6 The statute also states that it does not preclude a judge from sentencing a convicted sex offender to GPS "or other electronic monitoring . . . as a condition or requirement of supervision" in connection with sentencing a defendant to CSL or PSL pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2C:43-6.4.

11
State v. Rothgreen
njsuperctappdiv · 1977 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1982–1982
1 sentence

1982Compare State v. Roth, 154 N.J.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
State, in Interest of Jab neutral
njsuperctappdiv · 1980
2 sentences

1992State in Interest of J.A.B., 175 N.J.

1992State in Interest of J.A.B., 175 N.J.Super. 396, 418 , 418 A.2d 1317 (App.Div.1980).

21992–1992
Strube v. Travelers Indemn. Co. green
njsuperctappdiv · 1994
1 sentence

1997We have no doubt that the impetus for this additional protection for the insured and this additional condition on the grant of the immunity was the Legislature’s recognition that the great volume of coverage selection disputes involves UM and UIM coverage. 2 See, e.g., Strube, supra, 277 N.J.Super. at 241-242, 649 A.2d 624 .

11997–1997
State v. Mingo green
nj · 1978
1 sentence

1994The court granted defendant's request on the condition that defense counsel would furnish the prosecutor with a copy of any reports rendered by the expert regarding the handwriting, "irrespective of whether the defense intended to use the expert as a witness at trial." Ibid.

11994–1994
Disalvo v. Mella neutral
nj · 1987
1 sentence

1990In other words, the imposition of agency regulations requiring a sale as a condition of claim is simply not "statutorily authorized." Ibid. *82 The Mack certification is relied upon to furnish a factual basis for DEP's actions in suspending the processing of claims because the prior regulations were creating problems.

11990–1990
Whittle v. Associated Indemnity Corp. green
nj · 1943
1 sentence

1984Whittle v. Associated Indemnity Corp., 130 N.J.L. 576 (E. & A. 1943), held that where, as here, a policy provides that notice is a condition precedent to recovery, the carrier is entitled to assert substantial non-performance of the condition as a defense to any proceeding against it on the policy, entirely without regard to whether it has been prejudiced by the default.

11984–1984
State v. Hare green
nj · 1976
1 sentence

1979Super. 464, 468 (App. Div. 1976), certif. den. 70 N.J. 525 (1976), to "nonresidential land" as a condition to immunity afforded by the act must be read as land not developed and used for residential purposes.

11979–1979
State v. Hauser green
njsuperctappdiv · 1977
1 sentence

1978The condition of this rule is that the verdict must constitute a finding "that all the elements of a lesser included offense have been properly established and no prejudice to the defendant will result." State v. Hauser, supra .

11978–1978
Bien v. Unger green
nj · 1900
1 sentence

1905Bien v. Unger, 35 Vroom, 596 .

11905–1905

Where else courts name it

NY 58 (1866–2025) WA 51 (1965–2026) CA 45 (1911–2026) PA 22 (1911–2024) OR 17 (1905–2025) TX 16 (1884–2021) IL 15 (1921–2023) GA 14 (1938–2021) IA 13 (1891–2024) FL 13 (1891–2024) NJ 12 (1905–2025) MO 11 (1907–1997) OK 10 (1911–1993) KS 10 (1895–2020) CT 10 (1945–2020) IN 9 (1880–2017) MD 8 (1983–2015) MI 8 (1887–2024) WI 8 (1934–2025) NC 8 (1908–2020) CO 7 (1941–2024) MA 7 (1947–2023) TN 7 (1935–2023) AL 6 (1908–1995) OH 6 (1909–2015) KY 6 (1953–2023) LA 4 (1904–1989) VT 4 (1923–2020) NM 4 (1999–2025) UT 4 (1992–2020) NE 3 (1873–2000) SC 3 (1932–1976) MN 3 (1985–2008) ND 2 (1920–2001) NV 2 (2015–2015) AZ 2 (1982–1986) ME 2 (1980–2016) DC 2 (1978–2005) MS 2 (1988–2007) VA 2 (1975–1984)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check