12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jaffee v. Redmondgreen1 sentence2020Jaffee, 518 U.S. at 17 (“Making the promise of confidentiality contingent upon a trial judge’s later evaluation of the relative importance of the patient’s interest in privacy and the evidentiary need for disclosure would eviscerate the effectiveness of the privilege.”). 12 Magney et al. v. Pham, MD et al., No. 96669-9 (Gordon McCloud, J., concurring in part/dissenting in part) comparison is imperfect. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Telectronics Pacing Systems, Inc.green1 sentence2013Inc.. 953 F. Supp. 909, 918 (S.D. | 1 | 1 |
Batton v. Eversgreen2 sentences2011Batton v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 176 (5th Cir.2010); Trentadue v. F.B.I., 572 F.3d 794, 807 (10th Cir.2009); Lahr, 569 F.3d at 987 ; Rein, 553 F.3d at 362 ; Grand Cent. 2011Batton v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 176 (5th Cir. 2010); Trentadue v. Fed. | 1 | 1 |
Trentadue v. Federal Bureau of Investigationgreen1 sentence2011Batton v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 176 (5th Cir.2010); Trentadue v. F.B.I., 572 F.3d 794, 807 (10th Cir.2009); Lahr, 569 F.3d at 987 ; Rein, 553 F.3d at 362 ; Grand Cent. | 1 | 1 |
State v. LaRuegreen1 sentence1983See State v. LaRue, 5 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Whitegreen2 sentences1982As we said in State v. White, Me., 280 A.2d 810, 812 (1971): "The importance of this requirement becomes apparent when we consider that many forms of conduct and language, although distasteful to certain individuals or even a majority of people, are nevertheless afforded constitutional protection." Accord, Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 , 94 S.Ct. 326 , 38 L.Ed.2d 303 (1973). 1982As we said in State v. White, Me., 280 A.2d 810, 812 (1971): "The importance of this requirement becomes apparent when we consider that many forms of conduct and language, although distasteful to certain individuals or even a majority of people, are nevertheless afforded constitutional protection." Accord, Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 , 94 S.Ct. 326 , 38 L.Ed.2d 303 (1973). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Russellgreen2 sentences1971See State v. Russell, 68 Wn.2d 748 , 415 P.2d 503 (1966). 1971See State v. Russell, 68 Wn.2d 748 , 415 P.2d 503 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Blakely v. Washington
green
2 sentences2005The Court reiterated the importance of this principle in Blakely , by pointing out that “[t]he Framers would not have thought it too much to demand that, before depriving a man of three more years of his liberty, the State should suffer the modest inconvenience of submitting its accusation to ‘the unanimous suffrage of twelve of his equals and neighbors,’ rather than a lone employee of the State.” Blakely, 542 U.S. at 313 -14 (quoting 4 William Blackstone, Commentaries on the Laws of England ch. 27, at 343 (1769)). ¶19 This court has already recognized that the scope of “sentence” is not limit 2005The Court reiterated the importance of this principle in Blakely , by pointing out that "[t]he Framers would not have thought it too much to demand that, before depriving a man of three more years of his liberty, the State should suffer the modest inconvenience of submitting its accusation to `the unanimous suffrage of twelve of his equals and neighbors,' rather than a lone employee of the State." Blakely, 542 U.S. at ___ , 124 S.Ct. at 2543 (quoting 4 WILLIAM BLACKSTONE, COMMENTARIES ON THE LAWS OF ENGLAND ch. 27, at 343 (1769)). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Washington Federation of State Employees v. State
green
2 sentences2000Wash. Fed'n, 127 Wash.2d at 553-54 , 901 P.2d 1028 . 2000Wash. Fed’n, 127 Wn.2d at 553-54 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Pratt
green
2 sentences2025Evans, 177 Wn.2d at 193 (citing State v. Hornaday, 105 Wn.2d 120, 127 , 713 P.2d 71 (1986); In re Post Sent’g Rev. of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239 , 250 & n. 4, 252-53, 955 P.2d 798 (1998)); State v. Pratt, 196 Wn.2d 849, 859-63 , 479 P.3d 680 (2021) (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting) (discussing the importance of the rule of lenity in our tradition of criminal justice). 2025Evans, 177 Wn.2d at 193 (citing State v. Hornaday, 105 Wn.2d 120, 127 , 713 P.2d 71 (1986); In re Post Sent’g Rev. of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239 , 250 & n. 4, 252-53, 955 P.2d 798 (1998)); State v. Pratt, 196 Wn.2d 849, 859-63 , 479 P.3d 680 (2021) (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting) (discussing the importance of the rule of lenity in our tradition of criminal justice). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
In the Matter of Charles
green
1 sentence2025Evans, 177 Wn.2d at 193 (citing State v. Hornaday, 105 Wn.2d 120, 127 , 713 P.2d 71 (1986); In re Post Sent’g Rev. of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239 , 250 & n. 4, 252-53, 955 P.2d 798 (1998)); State v. Pratt, 196 Wn.2d 849, 859-63 , 479 P.3d 680 (2021) (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting) (discussing the importance of the rule of lenity in our tradition of criminal justice). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Lewis
green
1 sentence2025Evans, 177 Wn.2d at 193 (citing State v. Hornaday, 105 Wn.2d 120, 127 , 713 P.2d 71 (1986); In re Post Sent’g Rev. of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239 , 250 & n. 4, 252-53, 955 P.2d 798 (1998)); State v. Pratt, 196 Wn.2d 849, 859-63 , 479 P.3d 680 (2021) (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting) (discussing the importance of the rule of lenity in our tradition of criminal justice). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Evans
green
1 sentence2025Evans, 177 Wn.2d at 193 (citing State v. Hornaday, 105 Wn.2d 120, 127 , 713 P.2d 71 (1986); In re Post Sent’g Rev. of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239 , 250 & n. 4, 252-53, 955 P.2d 798 (1998)); State v. Pratt, 196 Wn.2d 849, 859-63 , 479 P.3d 680 (2021) (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting) (discussing the importance of the rule of lenity in our tradition of criminal justice). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Hornaday
red
2 sentences2025Evans, 177 Wn.2d at 193 (citing State v. Hornaday, 105 Wn.2d 120, 127 , 713 P.2d 71 (1986); In re Post Sent’g Rev. of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239 , 250 & n. 4, 252-53, 955 P.2d 798 (1998)); State v. Pratt, 196 Wn.2d 849, 859-63 , 479 P.3d 680 (2021) (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting) (discussing the importance of the rule of lenity in our tradition of criminal justice). 2025Evans, 177 Wn.2d at 193 (citing State v. Hornaday, 105 Wn.2d 120, 127 , 713 P.2d 71 (1986); In re Post Sent’g Rev. of Charles, 135 Wn.2d 239 , 250 & n. 4, 252-53, 955 P.2d 798 (1998)); State v. Pratt, 196 Wn.2d 849, 859-63 , 479 P.3d 680 (2021) (Gordon McCloud, J., dissenting) (discussing the importance of the rule of lenity in our tradition of criminal justice). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Khounvichai
green
1 sentence2023The Supreme Court has since “clarified that the Ferrier requirement is limited to situations where police request entry into a home for the purpose of obtaining consent to conduct a warrantless search . . . .” State v. Khounvichai, 149 Wn.2d 557, 563 , 69 P.3d 862 (2003). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Khounvichai
green
1 sentence2023The Supreme Court has since “clarified that the Ferrier requirement is limited to situations where police request entry into a home for the purpose of obtaining consent to conduct a warrantless search . . . .” State v. Khounvichai, 149 Wn.2d 557, 563 , 69 P.3d 862 (2003). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Rein v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
green
1 sentence2011Batton v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 176 (5th Cir.2010); Trentadue v. F.B.I., 572 F.3d 794, 807 (10th Cir.2009); Lahr, 569 F.3d at 987 ; Rein, 553 F.3d at 362 ; Grand Cent. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Lahr v. National Transportation Safety Board
green
1 sentence2011Batton v. Evers, 598 F.3d 169, 176 (5th Cir.2010); Trentadue v. F.B.I., 572 F.3d 794, 807 (10th Cir.2009); Lahr, 569 F.3d at 987 ; Rein, 553 F.3d at 362 ; Grand Cent. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Washington Fed. of State Emp. v. State
green
1 sentence2000Wash. Fed'n, 127 Wash.2d at 553-54 , 901 P.2d 1028 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Hess v. Indiana
green
2 sentences1982As we said in State v. White, Me., 280 A.2d 810, 812 (1971): "The importance of this requirement becomes apparent when we consider that many forms of conduct and language, although distasteful to certain individuals or even a majority of people, are nevertheless afforded constitutional protection." Accord, Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 , 94 S.Ct. 326 , 38 L.Ed.2d 303 (1973). 1982As we said in State v. White, Me., 280 A.2d 810, 812 (1971): "The importance of this requirement becomes apparent when we consider that many forms of conduct and language, although distasteful to certain individuals or even a majority of people, are nevertheless afforded constitutional protection." Accord, Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 , 94 S.Ct. 326 , 38 L.Ed.2d 303 (1973). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Cohen v. California
green
2 sentences1982As we said in State v. White, Me., 280 A.2d 810, 812 (1971): "The importance of this requirement becomes apparent when we consider that many forms of conduct and language, although distasteful to certain individuals or even a majority of people, are nevertheless afforded constitutional protection." Accord, Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 , 94 S.Ct. 326 , 38 L.Ed.2d 303 (1973). 1982As we said in State v. White, Me., 280 A.2d 810, 812 (1971): "The importance of this requirement becomes apparent when we consider that many forms of conduct and language, although distasteful to certain individuals or even a majority of people, are nevertheless afforded constitutional protection." Accord, Cohen v. California, 403 U.S. 15, 25 , 91 S.Ct. 1780 , 29 L.Ed.2d 284 (1971); Hess v. Indiana, 414 U.S. 105 , 94 S.Ct. 326 , 38 L.Ed.2d 303 (1973). | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.