Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
8 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1908–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Tulipanegreen2 sentences2013See, eg.,People v. Tulipane, 192 Colo. 476, 478-79 , 560 P.2d 94, 96 (1977); Brutcher v. Dist. 2013See, eg.,People v. Tulipane, 192 Colo. 476, 478-79 , 560 P.2d 94, 96 (1977); Brutcher v. Dist. | 1 | 1 |
Boysaw v. Superior Courtgreen2 sentences2007See, eg., In re Chaplain, 621 F.2d 1272, 1276 (4th Cir.1980) (holding that advance warning must be given to a possibly unaware contem-nor that a contempt conviction may ultimately result from his repeated conduct); United States v. Abascal, 509 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1975) (recognizing that under some circumstances, a warning is necessary before a court may impose sanctions for criminal contempt); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir.1965) (recognizing that prior warnings are generally desirable); Boysaw v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.4th 215 , 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 531 , 999 P.2d 748, 752 2007See, eg., In re Chaplain, 621 F.2d 1272, 1276 (4th Cir.1980) (holding that advance warning must be given to a possibly unaware contem-nor that a contempt conviction may ultimately result from his repeated conduct); United States v. Abascal, 509 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1975) (recognizing that under some circumstances, a warning is necessary before a court may impose sanctions for criminal contempt); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir.1965) (recognizing that prior warnings are generally desirable); Boysaw v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.4th 215 , 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 531 , 999 P.2d 748, 752 | 1 | 1 |
Weaver v. Superior Court of the State of Alaska, Third Judicial Districtgreen1 sentence2007See, eg., In re Chaplain, 621 F.2d 1272, 1276 (4th Cir.1980) (holding that advance warning must be given to a possibly unaware contem-nor that a contempt conviction may ultimately result from his repeated conduct); United States v. Abascal, 509 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1975) (recognizing that under some circumstances, a warning is necessary before a court may impose sanctions for criminal contempt); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir.1965) (recognizing that prior warnings are generally desirable); Boysaw v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.4th 215 , 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 531 , 999 P.2d 748, 752 | 1 | 1 |
In Re Russell Wilson Chaplain, Srgreen1 sentence2007See, eg., In re Chaplain, 621 F.2d 1272, 1276 (4th Cir.1980) (holding that advance warning must be given to a possibly unaware contem-nor that a contempt conviction may ultimately result from his repeated conduct); United States v. Abascal, 509 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1975) (recognizing that under some circumstances, a warning is necessary before a court may impose sanctions for criminal contempt); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir.1965) (recognizing that prior warnings are generally desirable); Boysaw v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.4th 215 , 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 531 , 999 P.2d 748, 752 | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Herkenhoffgreen1 sentence2007See, eg., In re Chaplain, 621 F.2d 1272, 1276 (4th Cir.1980) (holding that advance warning must be given to a possibly unaware contem-nor that a contempt conviction may ultimately result from his repeated conduct); United States v. Abascal, 509 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1975) (recognizing that under some circumstances, a warning is necessary before a court may impose sanctions for criminal contempt); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir.1965) (recognizing that prior warnings are generally desirable); Boysaw v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.4th 215 , 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 531 , 999 P.2d 748, 752 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Jacques M. Schiffergreen1 sentence2007See, eg., In re Chaplain, 621 F.2d 1272, 1276 (4th Cir.1980) (holding that advance warning must be given to a possibly unaware contem-nor that a contempt conviction may ultimately result from his repeated conduct); United States v. Abascal, 509 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1975) (recognizing that under some circumstances, a warning is necessary before a court may impose sanctions for criminal contempt); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir.1965) (recognizing that prior warnings are generally desirable); Boysaw v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.4th 215 , 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 531 , 999 P.2d 748, 752 | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Manuel Glenn Abascalgreen1 sentence2007See, eg., In re Chaplain, 621 F.2d 1272, 1276 (4th Cir.1980) (holding that advance warning must be given to a possibly unaware contem-nor that a contempt conviction may ultimately result from his repeated conduct); United States v. Abascal, 509 F.2d 752, 755 (9th Cir.1975) (recognizing that under some circumstances, a warning is necessary before a court may impose sanctions for criminal contempt); United States v. Schiffer, 351 F.2d 91, 95 (6th Cir.1965) (recognizing that prior warnings are generally desirable); Boysaw v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.4th 215 , 96 Cal.Rptr.2d 531 , 999 P.2d 748, 752 | 1 | 1 |
People v. Higinbothamgreen1 sentence1989Martin v. People, 738 P.2d 789, 792 (Colo.1987); see Higinbotham, 712 P.2d at 996 . | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Peoplegreen1 sentence1989Martin v. People, 738 P.2d 789, 792 (Colo.1987); see Higinbotham, 712 P.2d at 996 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cartwright v. Ruffin
neutral
2 sentences1914Bliss on Code Pleading, 3rd Ed., Sec. 430; Cartwright v. Ruffin, supra. It is, therefore, hereby directed that, in case of a retrial, the defendants be permitted to amend their pleadings in conformity with this .opinion so that justice may be accomplished. 1914Bliss on Code Pleading, 3rd Ed., Sec. 430; Cartwright v. Ruffin, supra. It is, therefore, hereby directed that, in case of a retrial, the defendants be permitted to amend their pleadings in conformity with this .opinion so that justice may be accomplished. | 2 | 1914–1914 |
Thomas v. People
green
2 sentences1998In Thomas , we retreated from our holding in Kogan by explaining that "we overemphasized the importance of the defense preparation rationale in Kogan .... [A]t least in most instances the defendant can obtain adequate information to prepare a defense through the charging document, the preliminary hearing, and the discovery process." Thomas, 803 P.2d at 154 . 1998In Thomas , we retreated from our holding in Kogan by explaining that “we overemphasized the importance of the defense preparation rationale in Kogan .... [A]t least in most instances the defendant can obtain adequate information to prepare a defense through the charging document, the preliminary hearing, and the discovery process.” Thomas, 803 P.2d at 154 . | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Trevarton v. Trevarton
green
1 sentence1994We recognized the importance of this principle in Trevarton , 151 Colo, at 421, 378 P.2d at 642 , and Schlessinger, 796 P.2d at 1387-89 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Schlessinger v. Schlessinger Ex Rel. Schlessinger
green
1 sentence1994We recognized the importance of this principle in Trevarton , 151 Colo, at 421, 378 P.2d at 642 , and Schlessinger, 796 P.2d at 1387-89 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Cache La Poudre Reservoir Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.
neutral
1 sentence1908Before this special proceeding was instituted, one of these appellees, The Cache la Poudre Reser voir Company, in a suit in equity against one of these appellants, The Water Supply and Storage Company, obtained a decree which, as between their reservoirs then in controversy, made that of the reservoir company senior.—Reservoir Com pany v. Water Company, 25 Colo. 161 , 27 Colo. 532 . | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Cache La Poudre Reservoir Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.
green
1 sentence1908Before this special proceeding was instituted, one of these appellees, The Cache la Poudre Reser voir Company, in a suit in equity against one of these appellants, The Water Supply and Storage Company, obtained a decree which, as between their reservoirs then in controversy, made that of the reservoir company senior.—Reservoir Com pany v. Water Company, 25 Colo. 161 , 27 Colo. 532 . | 1 | 1908–1908 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.