Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hoskinsgreen2 sentences2020State v. Hoskins, 165 Idaho 217, 223-25 , 443 P.3d 231, 237-39 (2019) (collecting cases, including State v. Cohagan, 162 Idaho 717 , 404 P.3d 659 (2017); State v. Fuller, 163 Idaho 585 , 416 P.3d 957 (2018); and State v. Gonzalez, 165 Idaho 95 , 439 P.3d 1267 (2019)). 2020State v. Hoskins, 165 Idaho 217, 223-25 , 443 P.3d 231, 237-39 (2019) (collecting cases, including State v. Cohagan, 162 Idaho 717 , 404 P.3d 659 (2017); State v. Fuller, 163 Idaho 585 , 416 P.3d 957 (2018); and State v. Gonzalez, 165 Idaho 95 , 439 P.3d 1267 (2019)). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Garneygreen2 sentences1983In State v. Garney, 45 Idaho 768, 775 , 265 P. 668, 670 (1928), the court said: The general rule is, that when a man is put upon trial for one offense, he is to be convicted, if at all, by evidence which shows that he is guilty of that offense alone, and that, under ordinary circumstances, proof of his guilt of one or a score of other offenses in his lifetime, wholly unconnected with that for which he is put upon trial, must be excluded. 1983In State v. Garney, 45 Idaho 768, 775 , 265 P. 668, 670 (1928), the court said: The general rule is, that when a man is put upon trial for one offense, he is to be convicted, if at all, by evidence which shows that he is guilty of that offense alone, and that, under ordinary circumstances, proof of his guilt of one or a score of other offenses in his lifetime, wholly unconnected with that for which he is put upon trial, must be excluded. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Heinze v. Bauer
green
1 sentence2025In Heinze, this Court recognized the importance of this principle, emphasizing: “If statements and arguments made by counsel in furtherance of a client’s claim were routinely deemed to constitute binding admissions against a lawyer in a subsequent legal malpractice action, it could conceivably have a chilling impact upon the vigor and resulting effectiveness of counsel’s advocacy.” Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. Matthew Elliot Cohagan
green
2 sentences2020State v. Hoskins, 165 Idaho 217, 223-25 , 443 P.3d 231, 237-39 (2019) (collecting cases, including State v. Cohagan, 162 Idaho 717 , 404 P.3d 659 (2017); State v. Fuller, 163 Idaho 585 , 416 P.3d 957 (2018); and State v. Gonzalez, 165 Idaho 95 , 439 P.3d 1267 (2019)). 2020State v. Hoskins, 165 Idaho 217, 223-25 , 443 P.3d 231, 237-39 (2019) (collecting cases, including State v. Cohagan, 162 Idaho 717 , 404 P.3d 659 (2017); State v. Fuller, 163 Idaho 585 , 416 P.3d 957 (2018); and State v. Gonzalez, 165 Idaho 95 , 439 P.3d 1267 (2019)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Fuller
green
1 sentence2020State v. Hoskins, 165 Idaho 217, 223-25 , 443 P.3d 231, 237-39 (2019) (collecting cases, including State v. Cohagan, 162 Idaho 717 , 404 P.3d 659 (2017); State v. Fuller, 163 Idaho 585 , 416 P.3d 957 (2018); and State v. Gonzalez, 165 Idaho 95 , 439 P.3d 1267 (2019)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Gonzalez
green
2 sentences2020State v. Hoskins, 165 Idaho 217, 223-25 , 443 P.3d 231, 237-39 (2019) (collecting cases, including State v. Cohagan, 162 Idaho 717 , 404 P.3d 659 (2017); State v. Fuller, 163 Idaho 585 , 416 P.3d 957 (2018); and State v. Gonzalez, 165 Idaho 95 , 439 P.3d 1267 (2019)). 2020State v. Hoskins, 165 Idaho 217, 223-25 , 443 P.3d 231, 237-39 (2019) (collecting cases, including State v. Cohagan, 162 Idaho 717 , 404 P.3d 659 (2017); State v. Fuller, 163 Idaho 585 , 416 P.3d 957 (2018); and State v. Gonzalez, 165 Idaho 95 , 439 P.3d 1267 (2019)). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Odiaga
green
2 sentences2011“Having previously decided this question, and being presented with no new basis upon which to consider the issue, we are guided by the principle of stare decisis to adhere to the law as expressed in our earlier opinions.” Odiaga, 125 Idaho at 388 , 871 P.2d at 805 . 2011“Having previously decided this question, and being presented with no new basis upon which to consider the issue, we are guided by the principle of stare decisis to adhere to the law as expressed in our earlier opinions.” Odiaga, 125 Idaho at 388 , 871 P.2d at 805 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
McCoy v. Lyons
green
2 sentences1997In McCoy , the Court pointed out the importance of this principle in summary judgment cases “where all reasonable inferences are resolved in favor of the party opposing summary judgment.” Id. at 774 , 820 P.2d at 371 . 1997In McCoy , the Court pointed out the importance of this principle in summary judgment cases “where all reasonable inferences are resolved in favor of the party opposing summary judgment.” Id. at 774 , 820 P.2d at 371 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Cornwall
green
2 sentences1978In State v. Cornwall, 95 Idaho 680 , 518 P.2d 863 (1974), we explained the importance of a hearing on an application for probation. 1978In State v. Cornwall, 95 Idaho 680 , 518 P.2d 863 (1974), we explained the importance of a hearing on an application for probation. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.