trustworthiness doctrine (Florida) · Go Syfert
← Florida issues

trustworthiness doctrine in Florida

11 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2025 3 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Geiger v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2005 · cited in 3 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2007–2025
2 sentences

2025Section 92.565 replaces the traditional corpus delicti rule with a trustworthiness test.1 See Geiger v. State, 907 So. 2d 668 , 673–74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005).

2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So. 2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute." (citing Geiger, 907 So. 2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So. 2d at 340 .

23
Wong Sun v. United Statesgreen
scotus · 1963 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2005–2016
2 sentences

2016We concluded that the statute's trustworthiness requirement, like the trustworthiness doctrine in federal jurisprudence, must encompass "some evidence that tends to establish the type of harm for which the defendant is being criminally charged." Id. at 675 (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488-89 (1963) ("It is a settled principle of the administration of criminal justice in the federal courts that a conviction must rest upon firmer ground than the uncorroborated admission or confession of the accused.")). - 16 - impairment.

2016We concluded that the statute's trustworthiness requirement, like the trustworthiness doctrine in federal jurisprudence, must encompass "some evidence that tends to establish the type of harm for which the defendant is being criminally charged." Id. at 675 (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488-89 (1963) ("It is a settled principle of the administration of criminal justice in the federal courts that a conviction must rest upon firmer ground than the uncorroborated admission or confession of the accused.")). - 16 - impairment.

22
United States v. Raul Lopez-Alvarezgreen
ca9 · 1992 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2005–2025
2 sentences

2025Penn. 1983))); cf. United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 592 (9th Cir. 1992) (explaining that, under the federal trustworthiness doctrine, the State "must introduce independent evidence tending to establish the trustworthiness of the admissions, unless the confession is, by virtue of special circumstances, inherently reliable" (emphasis added)); People v. LaRosa, 293 P.3d 567 , 577–78 (Colo. 2013) ("Under the trustworthiness standard, the prosecution is not required to present evidence other than a defendant's confession to establish the corpus delicti.

2005See, e.g., Wong Sun, 371 U.S. at 489 n. 15, 83 S.Ct. 407 ; Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d at 592 .

12
Bank of New York v. Andrew Callowaygreen
fladistctapp · 2015 · cited in 2 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2018–2025
2 sentences

2025See Riano v. Bank of Am., N.A., 338 So. 3d 953 , 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We affirm the final judgment in favor of the Bank on the basis that there is no independent cause of action for a lender’s failure to provide a loan modification agreement under [the Home Affordable Modification Program] . . . .”); HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n v. Buset, 241 So. 3d 882, 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Under the law of negotiable instruments, therefore, the Bank had standing because it was the holder of a note originally indorsed in blank and then specially indorsed to the Bank.”); Id. at 891 (“Indeed, ‘[w]here a b

2018Indeed, “[w]here a business takes custody of another business’s records and integrates them within its own records” the trustworthiness requirement of the records will be met in “most instances . . . by providing evidence of a business relationship or contractual obligation between the parties that ensures a substantial incentive for accuracy.” Bank of New York v. Calloway, 157 So. 3d 1064, 1071-72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015).

12
Worth v. Estategreen
fladistctapp · 2018 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025
2 sentences

2025See Riano v. Bank of Am., N.A., 338 So. 3d 953 , 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We affirm the final judgment in favor of the Bank on the basis that there is no independent cause of action for a lender’s failure to provide a loan modification agreement under [the Home Affordable Modification Program] . . . .”); HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n v. Buset, 241 So. 3d 882, 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Under the law of negotiable instruments, therefore, the Bank had standing because it was the holder of a note originally indorsed in blank and then specially indorsed to the Bank.”); Id. at 891 (“Indeed, ‘[w]here a b

2025See Riano v. Bank of Am., N.A., 338 So. 3d 953 , 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We affirm the final judgment in favor of the Bank on the basis that there is no independent cause of action for a lender’s failure to provide a loan modification agreement under [the Home Affordable Modification Program] . . . .”); HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n v. Buset, 241 So. 3d 882, 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Under the law of negotiable instruments, therefore, the Bank had standing because it was the holder of a note originally indorsed in blank and then specially indorsed to the Bank.”); Id. at 891 (“Indeed, ‘[w]here a b

11
Cotton v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2000 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024Certain purported "self-serving exculpatory statement[s]" made by a defendant might lack "reliability and trustworthiness . . . ." See Cotton v. State, 763 So. 2d 437, 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (concluding that a defendant's 33 "post-arrest statement to the police, wherein he explained his prior state of mind and conduct surrounding possession of the cocaine" and denied "guilty knowledge of the cocaine c[ould not] be construed as a statement of then-existing state of mind offered for the reasons contemplated by section 90.803(3) . . . [because] his statement [was] precisely the type of self-serv

11
Hernandez v. Stategreen
fladistctapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So. 2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute." (citing Geiger, 907 So. 2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So. 2d at 340 .

2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So.2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute.” (citing Geiger, 907 So.2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So.2d at 340 .

11
Burks v. Stategreen
fla · 1993 · cited in 1 Florida opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005See, e.g., Burks v. State, 613 So.2d 441, 445-46 (Fla.1993) (Shaw, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Opper v. United States green
scotus · 1954
2 sentences

2005THE TRUSTWORTHINESS DOCTRINE In Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954), the United States Supreme Court rejected the traditional corpus delicti rule for the trustworthiness doctrine.

2005THE TRUSTWORTHINESS DOCTRINE In Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954), the United States Supreme Court rejected the traditional corpus delicti rule for the trustworthiness doctrine.

32002–2005
Channell v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. green
fladistctapp · 2015
2 sentences

2018Thus, we must conclude “[t]he record fails to demonstrate that an adequate foundational predicate was established, and the loan . . . records relied on to establish the outstanding debt constituted inadmissible hearsay.” Channell, 173 So. 3d at 1020 (citing §§ 90.802, 90.803(6), Fla. Stat. (2014)).

2018Thus, we must conclude “[t]he record fails to demonstrate that an adequate foundational predicate was established, and the loan . . . records relied on to establish the outstanding debt constituted inadmissible hearsay.” Channell, 173 So. 3d at 1020 (citing §§ 90.802, 90.803(6), Fla. Stat. (2014)).

22018–2018
People v. LaRosa green
colo · 2013
1 sentence

2025Penn. 1983))); cf. United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 592 (9th Cir. 1992) (explaining that, under the federal trustworthiness doctrine, the State "must introduce independent evidence tending to establish the trustworthiness of the admissions, unless the confession is, by virtue of special circumstances, inherently reliable" (emphasis added)); People v. LaRosa, 293 P.3d 567 , 577–78 (Colo. 2013) ("Under the trustworthiness standard, the prosecution is not required to present evidence other than a defendant's confession to establish the corpus delicti.

12025–2025
Bradley v. State green
fladistctapp · 2005
2 sentences

2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So. 2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute." (citing Geiger, 907 So. 2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So. 2d at 340 .

2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So.2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute.” (citing Geiger, 907 So.2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So.2d at 340 .

12016–2016
United States v. Daryl E. Singleterry green
ca1 · 1994
1 sentence

2002Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 , 75 S.Ct. 194 , 99 L.Ed. 192 (1954); Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); U.S. v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 (1st Cir.1994); Harris .

12002–2002
Smith v. United States green
scotus · 1954
2 sentences

2002Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 , 75 S.Ct. 194 , 99 L.Ed. 192 (1954); Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); U.S. v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 (1st Cir.1994); Harris .

2002Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 , 75 S.Ct. 194 , 99 L.Ed. 192 (1954); Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); U.S. v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 (1st Cir.1994); Harris .

12002–2002
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Raphello Harris, Sr. green
ca3 · 1991
1 sentence

2002In Harris , the court suggested that the trustworthiness doctrine may be as strict or stricter than corpus delicti and that application of both may lead to identical results in many cases. 938 F.2d at 410 n. 7.

12002–2002
State v. Wallace green
fladistctapp · 1999
1 sentence

2002Id.

12002–2002

Statutes the citing opinions construe

FL § 90.803 (5) FL § 92.565 (5) FL § 794.011 (3) FL § 90.802 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

IN 31 (2007–2020) CA 28 (1976–2026) TX 19 (1986–2018) NJ 18 (1983–2026) FL 11 (2002–2025) MN 10 (1984–2025) NM 10 (1994–2021) MS 10 (2001–2022) UT 9 (1987–2025) MI 9 (1990–2023) NC 7 (1987–2021) OK 6 (1994–2024) CO 5 (2000–2023) IL 5 (2007–2013) NV 5 (1991–2015) HI 5 (1989–2019) SD 4 (2003–2015) GA 4 (1998–2026) NY 4 (1980–1995) WA 4 (1993–2017) KS 4 (2014–2024) CT 3 (2006–2019) PA 3 (1973–2003) ID 3 (2003–2011) WI 3 (2022–2024) TN 3 (2014–2015) IA 2 (2020–2021) ME 2 (2018–2019) VA 2 (2011–2012) MD 2 (1994–2004) VT 2 (2014–2015) OH 2 (1999–2009) AL 2 (2003–2011) AZ 2 (1990–2015) ND 2 (2014–2021)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check