Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Geiger v. Stategreen2 sentences2025Section 92.565 replaces the traditional corpus delicti rule with a trustworthiness test.1 See Geiger v. State, 907 So. 2d 668 , 673–74 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005). 2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So. 2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute." (citing Geiger, 907 So. 2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So. 2d at 340 . | 2 | 3 |
Wong Sun v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2016We concluded that the statute's trustworthiness requirement, like the trustworthiness doctrine in federal jurisprudence, must encompass "some evidence that tends to establish the type of harm for which the defendant is being criminally charged." Id. at 675 (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488-89 (1963) ("It is a settled principle of the administration of criminal justice in the federal courts that a conviction must rest upon firmer ground than the uncorroborated admission or confession of the accused.")). - 16 - impairment. 2016We concluded that the statute's trustworthiness requirement, like the trustworthiness doctrine in federal jurisprudence, must encompass "some evidence that tends to establish the type of harm for which the defendant is being criminally charged." Id. at 675 (citing Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 488-89 (1963) ("It is a settled principle of the administration of criminal justice in the federal courts that a conviction must rest upon firmer ground than the uncorroborated admission or confession of the accused.")). - 16 - impairment. | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Raul Lopez-Alvarezgreen2 sentences2025Penn. 1983))); cf. United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 592 (9th Cir. 1992) (explaining that, under the federal trustworthiness doctrine, the State "must introduce independent evidence tending to establish the trustworthiness of the admissions, unless the confession is, by virtue of special circumstances, inherently reliable" (emphasis added)); People v. LaRosa, 293 P.3d 567 , 577–78 (Colo. 2013) ("Under the trustworthiness standard, the prosecution is not required to present evidence other than a defendant's confession to establish the corpus delicti. 2005See, e.g., Wong Sun, 371 U.S. at 489 n. 15, 83 S.Ct. 407 ; Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d at 592 . | 1 | 2 |
Bank of New York v. Andrew Callowaygreen2 sentences2025See Riano v. Bank of Am., N.A., 338 So. 3d 953 , 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We affirm the final judgment in favor of the Bank on the basis that there is no independent cause of action for a lender’s failure to provide a loan modification agreement under [the Home Affordable Modification Program] . . . .”); HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n v. Buset, 241 So. 3d 882, 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Under the law of negotiable instruments, therefore, the Bank had standing because it was the holder of a note originally indorsed in blank and then specially indorsed to the Bank.”); Id. at 891 (“Indeed, ‘[w]here a b 2018Indeed, “[w]here a business takes custody of another business’s records and integrates them within its own records” the trustworthiness requirement of the records will be met in “most instances . . . by providing evidence of a business relationship or contractual obligation between the parties that ensures a substantial incentive for accuracy.” Bank of New York v. Calloway, 157 So. 3d 1064, 1071-72 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). | 1 | 2 |
Worth v. Estategreen2 sentences2025See Riano v. Bank of Am., N.A., 338 So. 3d 953 , 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We affirm the final judgment in favor of the Bank on the basis that there is no independent cause of action for a lender’s failure to provide a loan modification agreement under [the Home Affordable Modification Program] . . . .”); HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n v. Buset, 241 So. 3d 882, 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Under the law of negotiable instruments, therefore, the Bank had standing because it was the holder of a note originally indorsed in blank and then specially indorsed to the Bank.”); Id. at 891 (“Indeed, ‘[w]here a b 2025See Riano v. Bank of Am., N.A., 338 So. 3d 953 , 954 (Fla. 3d DCA 2022) (“We affirm the final judgment in favor of the Bank on the basis that there is no independent cause of action for a lender’s failure to provide a loan modification agreement under [the Home Affordable Modification Program] . . . .”); HSBC Bank USA, Nat’l Ass’n v. Buset, 241 So. 3d 882, 890 (Fla. 3d DCA 2018) (“Under the law of negotiable instruments, therefore, the Bank had standing because it was the holder of a note originally indorsed in blank and then specially indorsed to the Bank.”); Id. at 891 (“Indeed, ‘[w]here a b | 1 | 1 |
Cotton v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Certain purported "self-serving exculpatory statement[s]" made by a defendant might lack "reliability and trustworthiness . . . ." See Cotton v. State, 763 So. 2d 437, 442 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000) (concluding that a defendant's 33 "post-arrest statement to the police, wherein he explained his prior state of mind and conduct surrounding possession of the cocaine" and denied "guilty knowledge of the cocaine c[ould not] be construed as a statement of then-existing state of mind offered for the reasons contemplated by section 90.803(3) . . . [because] his statement [was] precisely the type of self-serv | 1 | 1 |
Hernandez v. Stategreen2 sentences2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So. 2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute." (citing Geiger, 907 So. 2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So. 2d at 340 . 2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So.2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute.” (citing Geiger, 907 So.2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So.2d at 340 . | 1 | 1 |
Burks v. Stategreen1 sentence2005See, e.g., Burks v. State, 613 So.2d 441, 445-46 (Fla.1993) (Shaw, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Opper v. United States
green
2 sentences2005THE TRUSTWORTHINESS DOCTRINE In Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954), the United States Supreme Court rejected the traditional corpus delicti rule for the trustworthiness doctrine. 2005THE TRUSTWORTHINESS DOCTRINE In Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954), the United States Supreme Court rejected the traditional corpus delicti rule for the trustworthiness doctrine. | 3 | 2002–2005 |
Channell v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.
green
2 sentences2018Thus, we must conclude “[t]he record fails to demonstrate that an adequate foundational predicate was established, and the loan . . . records relied on to establish the outstanding debt constituted inadmissible hearsay.” Channell, 173 So. 3d at 1020 (citing §§ 90.802, 90.803(6), Fla. Stat. (2014)). 2018Thus, we must conclude “[t]he record fails to demonstrate that an adequate foundational predicate was established, and the loan . . . records relied on to establish the outstanding debt constituted inadmissible hearsay.” Channell, 173 So. 3d at 1020 (citing §§ 90.802, 90.803(6), Fla. Stat. (2014)). | 2 | 2018–2018 |
People v. LaRosa
green
1 sentence2025Penn. 1983))); cf. United States v. Lopez-Alvarez, 970 F.2d 583, 592 (9th Cir. 1992) (explaining that, under the federal trustworthiness doctrine, the State "must introduce independent evidence tending to establish the trustworthiness of the admissions, unless the confession is, by virtue of special circumstances, inherently reliable" (emphasis added)); People v. LaRosa, 293 P.3d 567 , 577–78 (Colo. 2013) ("Under the trustworthiness standard, the prosecution is not required to present evidence other than a defendant's confession to establish the corpus delicti. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Bradley v. State
green
2 sentences2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So. 2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ("When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute." (citing Geiger, 907 So. 2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So. 2d at 340 . 2016See Hernandez v. State, 946 So.2d 1270, 1275 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) (“When section 92.565 is properly invoked, it replaces the corpus delicti doctrine with the trustworthiness doctrine with respect to the offenses listed in the statute.” (citing Geiger, 907 So.2d at 674 )); Bradley, 918 So.2d at 340 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
United States v. Daryl E. Singleterry
green
1 sentence2002Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 , 75 S.Ct. 194 , 99 L.Ed. 192 (1954); Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); U.S. v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 (1st Cir.1994); Harris . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Smith v. United States
green
2 sentences2002Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 , 75 S.Ct. 194 , 99 L.Ed. 192 (1954); Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); U.S. v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 (1st Cir.1994); Harris . 2002Smith v. United States, 348 U.S. 147 , 75 S.Ct. 194 , 99 L.Ed. 192 (1954); Opper v. United States, 348 U.S. 84 , 75 S.Ct. 158 , 99 L.Ed. 101 (1954); U.S. v. Singleterry, 29 F.3d 733 (1st Cir.1994); Harris . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Government of the Virgin Islands v. Raphello Harris, Sr.
green
1 sentence2002In Harris , the court suggested that the trustworthiness doctrine may be as strict or stricter than corpus delicti and that application of both may lead to identical results in many cases. 938 F.2d at 410 n. 7. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Wallace
green
1 sentence2002Id. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.