consistent rule in Oklahoma

11 Oklahoma opinions name it 3 courts 1918–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (5)

Case	Followed	Cited
Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. Keyesgreen okla · 1992 · cited in 3 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1995–2007 2 sentences 2007Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. Keyes, 836 P.2d 1283, 1288 (Okla.1992). 2007Whig Syndicate, Inc. v. Keyes, 836 P.2d 1283, 1288 (Okla.1992).	3	3
Taylor v. Stategreen oklacrimapp · 2000 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See Taylor v. State , 2000 OK CR 6 , ¶ 48, 998 P.2d 1225 , 1237, abrogated on other grounds by Malone v. State , 2007 OK CR 34 , 168 P.3d 185 (refusing to second guess trial counsel's decision to maintain consistent defenses in first and second stage of trial). ¶200 Appellant has also failed to demonstrate prejudice from counsel's decision to not call Musick as a witness. 2018See Taylor v. State , 2000 OK CR 6 , ¶ 48, 998 P.2d 1225 , 1237, abrogated on other grounds by Malone v. State , 2007 OK CR 34 , 168 P.3d 185 (refusing to second guess trial counsel's decision to maintain consistent defenses in first and second stage of trial). ¶200 Appellant has also failed to demonstrate prejudice from counsel's decision to not call Musick as a witness.	2	2
Malone v. Stategreen oklacrimapp · 2007 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018See Taylor v. State , 2000 OK CR 6 , ¶ 48, 998 P.2d 1225 , 1237, abrogated on other grounds by Malone v. State , 2007 OK CR 34 , 168 P.3d 185 (refusing to second guess trial counsel's decision to maintain consistent defenses in first and second stage of trial). ¶200 Appellant has also failed to demonstrate prejudice from counsel's decision to not call Musick as a witness. 2018See Taylor v. State , 2000 OK CR 6 , ¶ 48, 998 P.2d 1225 , 1237, abrogated on other grounds by Malone v. State , 2007 OK CR 34 , 168 P.3d 185 (refusing to second guess trial counsel's decision to maintain consistent defenses in first and second stage of trial). ¶200 Appellant has also failed to demonstrate prejudice from counsel's decision to not call Musick as a witness.	2	2
Arkansas Valley State Bank v. Phillipsgreen okla · 2007 · cited in 2 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015 2 sentences 2015Id. 18, 171 P.3d at 908 . 2015Id. ¶ 8, 171 P.3d at 903 .	1	2
Ferbrache v. Stategreen oklacrimapp · 1922 · cited in 1 Oklahoma opinions naming this issue, 1948–1948 1 sentence 1948See Ferbrache v. State, 21 Okla.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

Case	Cited	Years
City of Tulsa v. Smittle green okla · 1985 2 sentences 2009City of Tulsa v. Smittle, 1985 OK 37, ¶ 17 , 702 P.2d 367, 371 . 116 Father also asserts that laches bars Mother's right to obtain an arrearage judgment. 2009City of Tulsa v. Smittle, 1985 OK 37, ¶ 17 , 702 P.2d 367, 371 . 116 Father also asserts that laches bars Mother's right to obtain an arrearage judgment.	1	2009–2009
Morris v. State green oklacrimapp · 1913 1 sentence 1948Cr. 241 , 131 P. 731 , 735 , wherein it was said: "This court does not hold with some, that, as a matter of law, rape cannot be established by the uncorroborated testimony of the prosecutrix," and then says, "where the testimony of the prosecutrix bears upon its face inherent evidence of improbability, there should be corroboration by other evidence, connecting the defendant with the commission of the crime." Such has been the consistent rule of this court.	1	1948–1948
Setzer v. Moore neutral okla · 1933 2 sentences 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 . 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 .	1	1935–1935
Board of County Commissioners of Garfield v. Porter neutral okla · 1907 2 sentences 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 . 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 .	1	1935–1935
Garland v. Union Trust Co. neutral · 1916 2 sentences 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 . 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 .	1	1935–1935
Showalter v. Hampton green · 1927 2 sentences 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 . 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 .	1	1935–1935
Smith v. Morris neutral okla · 1933 2 sentences 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 . 1935Smith v. Morris, 166 Okla. 285 , 27 P. (2d) 631 ; Garland v. Union Trust Co., 49 Okla. 654 , 154 P. 676 ; Bd. County Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173 , 92 P. 152 ; Setzer v. Moore, 164 Okla. 70 , 22 P. (2d) 998 ; Showalter v. Hampton, 122 Okla. 192 , 253 P. 105 .	1	1935–1935
Covington v. Fisher green okla · 1908 2 sentences 1918Covington v. Fisher, 22 Okla. 207 , 97 Pac. 615 ; Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. Randall, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 1012 ; Metcalf v. Glaze, 70 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 447 ; Emerson-Brantingham Imp. 1918Covington v. Fisher, 22 Okla. 207 , 97 Pac. 615 ; Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. Randall, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 1012 ; Metcalf v. Glaze, 70 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 447 ; Emerson-Brantingham Imp.	1	1918–1918
Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. T. D. Randall & Co. neutral okla · 1917 1 sentence 1918Covington v. Fisher, 22 Okla. 207 , 97 Pac. 615 ; Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. Randall, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 1012 ; Metcalf v. Glaze, 70 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 447 ; Emerson-Brantingham Imp.	1	1918–1918
Hughes v. Kano neutral okla · 1918 1 sentence 1918Covington v. Fisher, 22 Okla. 207 , 97 Pac. 615 ; Oklahoma Hay & Grain Co. v. Randall, 66 Oklahoma, 168 Pac. 1012 ; Metcalf v. Glaze, 70 Oklahoma, 173 Pac. 447 ; Emerson-Brantingham Imp.	1	1918–1918

Where else courts name it

LA 65 (1939–2025) CA 32 (1921–2024) WA 27 (1909–2025) TX 26 (1948–2025) NY 22 (1885–2022) IL 21 (1922–2026) PA 14 (1913–2023) NJ 13 (1908–2021) WI 13 (1960–2021) FL 13 (1977–2018) OR 13 (1959–2021) OH 12 (1853–2022) AZ 12 (1955–2026) MO 11 (1907–2014) OK 11 (1918–2018) GA 10 (1971–2023) SD 9 (1975–2026) MD 9 (1994–2021) IA 9 (1893–2024) NE 9 (1903–2022) MI 9 (1976–2023) UT 8 (1989–2026) NM 8 (1971–2018) KY 8 (1943–2026) MA 8 (1981–2019) MN 7 (1977–2018) CT 7 (1973–2023) NC 6 (1983–2018) WY 6 (1979–2015) ME 6 (2006–2019) KS 6 (1988–2022) MT 6 (1978–2025) AL 6 (1968–2017) TN 6 (1985–2020) CO 5 (1958–2025) IN 5 (1972–1989) DE 4 (1988–2024) MS 4 (1992–2024) VT 4 (2002–2021) AK 3 (1988–2021) HI 3 (1980–2014) ID 3 (2015–2021) DC 2 (1990–2017) SC 2 (1984–2018) RI 2 (1989–2005) VA 2 (2009–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check