9 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller of Treasurygreen2 sentences2003Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller, 302 Md. 825, 836-37 , 490 A.2d 1296, 1300-02 (1985). 2003Ramsay, Scarlett & Co. v. Comptroller, 302 Md. 825, 836-37 , 490 A.2d 1296, 1300-02 (1985). | 2 | 2 |
State v. Williamsgreen2 sentences2021Id. at 223 , 896 A.2d at 990 (emphasis added). 2021Id. at 223 , 896 A.2d at 990 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Golochowiczgreen2 sentences2011People v. Golochowicz, 413 Mich. 298 , 319 N.W.2d 518, 524 (1982). 2011People v. Golochowicz, 413 Mich. 298 , 319 N.W.2d 518, 524 (1982). | 1 | 1 |
Baltimore Building & Construction Trades Council v. Barnesgreen2 sentences1999Trades Council v. Barnes, 290 Md. 9, 14 , 427 A.2d 979, 982 (1981). *15 This is consistent with the standard of review applicable to all administrative agencies. 1999Trades Council v. Barnes, 290 Md. 9, 14 , 427 A.2d 979, 982 (1981). *15 This is consistent with the standard of review applicable to all administrative agencies. | 1 | 1 |
Hart v. Millergreen2 sentences1997See In re Don Mc., 344 Md. 194, 201 , 686 A.2d 269 (1996) (“The term ‘discretion’ means the absence of a hard and fast rule.”); Dennison v. State, 87 Md.App. 749, 763 , 591 A.2d 568 , cert. denied, 324 Md. 324 , 597 A.2d 421 (1991) (court may not simply apply a consistent rule to the case before it, which, in essence, is the refusal to exercise discretion); Hart v. Miller, 65 Md.App. 620, 627 , 501 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 305 Md. 621 , 505 A.2d 1342 (1986) (“When ... the trial court recognizes its right to exercise discretion but then declines to exercise it in favor of adhering to some consi 1997See In re Don Mc., 344 Md. 194, 201 , 686 A.2d 269 (1996) (“The term ‘discretion’ means the absence of a hard and fast rule.”); Dennison v. State, 87 Md.App. 749, 763 , 591 A.2d 568 , cert. denied, 324 Md. 324 , 597 A.2d 421 (1991) (court may not simply apply a consistent rule to the case before it, which, in essence, is the refusal to exercise discretion); Hart v. Miller, 65 Md.App. 620, 627 , 501 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 305 Md. 621 , 505 A.2d 1342 (1986) (“When ... the trial court recognizes its right to exercise discretion but then declines to exercise it in favor of adhering to some consi | 1 | 1 |
In Re Don Mc.green2 sentences1997See In re Don Mc., 344 Md. 194, 201 , 686 A.2d 269 (1996) (“The term ‘discretion’ means the absence of a hard and fast rule.”); Dennison v. State, 87 Md.App. 749, 763 , 591 A.2d 568 , cert. denied, 324 Md. 324 , 597 A.2d 421 (1991) (court may not simply apply a consistent rule to the case before it, which, in essence, is the refusal to exercise discretion); Hart v. Miller, 65 Md.App. 620, 627 , 501 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 305 Md. 621 , 505 A.2d 1342 (1986) (“When ... the trial court recognizes its right to exercise discretion but then declines to exercise it in favor of adhering to some consi 1997See In re Don Mc., 344 Md. 194, 201 , 686 A.2d 269 (1996) (“The term ‘discretion’ means the absence of a hard and fast rule.”); Dennison v. State, 87 Md.App. 749, 763 , 591 A.2d 568 , cert. denied, 324 Md. 324 , 597 A.2d 421 (1991) (court may not simply apply a consistent rule to the case before it, which, in essence, is the refusal to exercise discretion); Hart v. Miller, 65 Md.App. 620, 627 , 501 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 305 Md. 621 , 505 A.2d 1342 (1986) (“When ... the trial court recognizes its right to exercise discretion but then declines to exercise it in favor of adhering to some consi | 1 | 1 |
Stansbury v. Stansburygreen2 sentences1994See Stansbury v. Stansbury, 223 Md. 475, 477 , 164 A.2d 877 (1960). 1994See Stansbury v. Stansbury, 223 Md. 475, 477 , 164 A.2d 877 (1960). | 1 | 1 |
Caldwell v. Mississippigreen2 sentences1994See Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 , 105 S.Ct. 2633 , 86 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985) (reversal required where the prosecution’s remarks are focused, unambiguous, and strong to the point of depriving the accused of fundamental fairness). 1994See Caldwell v. Mississippi, 472 U.S. 320 , 105 S.Ct. 2633 , 86 L.Ed.2d 231 (1985) (reversal required where the prosecution’s remarks are focused, unambiguous, and strong to the point of depriving the accused of fundamental fairness). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lutz v. State
green
2 sentences2015This is consistent with the principle articulated in Lutz—where the common law rule and the statute are in such direct conflict that they cannot coexist. 167 Md. at 15 , 172 A. 354 . 2015This is consistent with the principle articulated in Lutz—where the common law rule and the statute are in such direct conflict that they cannot coexist. 167 Md. at 15 , 172 A. 354 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Moaney v. State
green
2 sentences2015In Moaney v. State, 28 Md.App. 408, 413 , 346 A.2d 466 (1975), this Court observed that although under the common law “it appears that a person accused of grand larceny is entitled to be tried upon an indictment returned by a grand jury,” that principle was abrogated through both legislative enactment and rule change. 2015In Moaney v. State, 28 Md.App. 408, 413 , 346 A.2d 466 (1975), this Court observed that although under the common law “it appears that a person accused of grand larceny is entitled to be tried upon an indictment returned by a grand jury,” that principle was abrogated through both legislative enactment and rule change. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
United States v. Lorenzo Osorio
green
1 sentence2006In United States v. Osorio, 929 F.2d 753 (1st Cir.1991), a drug conspiracy case involving the nondisclosure by the State of a key witness’s extensive drug history, the court scolded the prosecutor’s office for ignoring such a clear and undebatable duty: “Irrespective of the reasonable strategic use defense counsel made of the late disclosed impeachment material, we still confront the disquieting problem of the government’s negligence in meeting its disclosure duties. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Dennison v. State
green
2 sentences1997See In re Don Mc., 344 Md. 194, 201 , 686 A.2d 269 (1996) (“The term ‘discretion’ means the absence of a hard and fast rule.”); Dennison v. State, 87 Md.App. 749, 763 , 591 A.2d 568 , cert. denied, 324 Md. 324 , 597 A.2d 421 (1991) (court may not simply apply a consistent rule to the case before it, which, in essence, is the refusal to exercise discretion); Hart v. Miller, 65 Md.App. 620, 627 , 501 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 305 Md. 621 , 505 A.2d 1342 (1986) (“When ... the trial court recognizes its right to exercise discretion but then declines to exercise it in favor of adhering to some consi 1997See In re Don Mc., 344 Md. 194, 201 , 686 A.2d 269 (1996) (“The term ‘discretion’ means the absence of a hard and fast rule.”); Dennison v. State, 87 Md.App. 749, 763 , 591 A.2d 568 , cert. denied, 324 Md. 324 , 597 A.2d 421 (1991) (court may not simply apply a consistent rule to the case before it, which, in essence, is the refusal to exercise discretion); Hart v. Miller, 65 Md.App. 620, 627 , 501 A.2d 872 , cert. denied, 305 Md. 621 , 505 A.2d 1342 (1986) (“When ... the trial court recognizes its right to exercise discretion but then declines to exercise it in favor of adhering to some consi | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.