9 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rudd v. Deboragreen1 sentence2014See Rudd v. Debora, 20 Neb. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp.
green
2 sentences2022The party who has the right of action has the full period of the statute in which to enforce it.” 9 This is consistent with the standard rule that a claim 7 Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp., supra note 5 , 273 Neb. at 425 , 730 N.W.2d at 381 . 8 Condon v. A. H. 2022The party who has the right of action has the full period of the statute in which to enforce it.” 9 This is consistent with the standard rule that a claim 7 Alston v. Hormel Foods Corp., supra note 5 , 273 Neb. at 425 , 730 N.W.2d at 381 . 8 Condon v. A. H. | 2 | 2022–2022 |
Schnackel v. Schnackel
green
1 sentence2019This is consistent with the standard set forth in a legal treatise, which provides that a party alleging dissipa- tion of marital property has the initial burden of production - 809 - Nebraska Court of Appeals Advance Sheets 27 Nebraska Appellate Reports SCHNACKEL v. SCHNACKEL Cite as 27 Neb. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Muhannad
green
1 sentence2013Nebraska Advance Sheets STATE v. MUHANNAD 579 Cite as 286 Neb. 567 intended to cause a mistrial is a finding of fact.31 While the denial of a plea in bar generally involves a question of law,32 most courts review for clear error the trial court’s finding con- cerning prosecutorial intent to goad the defendant into moving for mistrial.33 This is consistent with our standard of review for other findings of fact by the trial court, and we hereby adopt it. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Wiskocil v. Kliment
neutral
2 sentences1961Wiskocil v. Kliment, 155 Neb. 103 , 50 N. W. 2d 786 ; Bailey v. Karnopp, 170 Neb. 836 , 104 N. W. 2d 417 . 1961Wiskocil v. Kliment, 155 Neb. 103 , 50 N. W. 2d 786 ; Bailey v. Karnopp, 170 Neb. 836 , 104 N. W. 2d 417 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Durfee v. Keiffer
green
2 sentences1961Durfee v. Keiffer, 168 Neb. 272 , 95 N. W. 2d 618 . 1961Durfee v. Keiffer, 168 Neb. 272 , 95 N. W. 2d 618 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Bailey v. Karnopp
neutral
2 sentences1961Wiskocil v. Kliment, 155 Neb. 103 , 50 N. W. 2d 786 ; Bailey v. Karnopp, 170 Neb. 836 , 104 N. W. 2d 417 . 1961Wiskocil v. Kliment, 155 Neb. 103 , 50 N. W. 2d 786 ; Bailey v. Karnopp, 170 Neb. 836 , 104 N. W. 2d 417 . | 1 | 1961–1961 |
Pasko v. Trela
green
2 sentences1953Pasko v. Trela, 153 Neb. 759 , 46 N. W. 2d 139 ; Peterson v. Peterson, 152 Neb. 571 , 41 N. W. 2d 847 . 1953Pasko v. Trela, 153 Neb. 759 , 46 N. W. 2d 139 ; Peterson v. Peterson, 152 Neb. 571 , 41 N. W. 2d 847 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Peterson v. Peterson
green
2 sentences1953Pasko v. Trela, 153 Neb. 759 , 46 N. W. 2d 139 ; Peterson v. Peterson, 152 Neb. 571 , 41 N. W. 2d 847 . 1953Pasko v. Trela, 153 Neb. 759 , 46 N. W. 2d 139 ; Peterson v. Peterson, 152 Neb. 571 , 41 N. W. 2d 847 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Brown v. Commissioners
green
1 sentence1903The earliest case in the reports dealing with this matter is Brown v. Otoe County, 6 Neb. 111 . | 1 | 1903–1903 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.