Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1983–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ratzlaf v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2009In that case, the United States Supreme Court held that "willful" in the context of § 5322 means acting with the knowledge that one's conduct is unlawful, and it approvingly cited appellate court cases defining "willfully" has having both "knowledge of the reporting requirement" and a "specific intent to commit the crime." Ratzlaf, 510 U.S. at 137, 141 , 114 S.Ct. 655 . 2009In that case, the United States Supreme Court held that “willful” in the context of § 5322 means acting with the knowledge that one’s conduct is unlawful, and it approvingly cited appellate court cases defining “willfully” as having both “ ‘knowledge of the reporting requirement’ ” and a “ ‘specific intent to commit the crime.’ ” Ratzlaf, 510 U.S. at 137, 141 . | 2 | 2 |
United States v. Bajakajiangreen1 sentence2022The Court ruled that the “amount of the forfeiture must bear some relationship to the gravity of the offense that it is designed to punish.” Bajakajian, 524 U.S. at 334 (emphasis added). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against Perez-Pena
green
2 sentences2009Based on our analysis above, the Board properly struck this mitigating factor because it conflicted with the hearing officer's finding that Vanderveen acted "intentionally" based on Ratzlaf . [22] FF 30. ¶ 37 Third, Vanderveen now seeks the mitigator of "other penalties and sanctions." He argues that the three months he served in prison, his time on house arrest, as well as his other sanctions [23] and the adverse publicity he suffered as a result of some unproven conspiracy charges against him constitute the mitigating factor of "other penalties and sanctions." Resp't's Br. at 23. ¶ 38 In pre 2009Based on our analysis above, the Board properly struck this mitigating factor because it conflicted with the hearing officer’s finding that Vanderveen acted “intentionally” based on Ratzlaf . 22 FF 30. ¶37 Third, Vanderveen now seeks the mitigator of “other penalties and sanctions.” He argues that the three months he served in prison, his time on house arrest, as well as his other sanctions 23 and the adverse publicity he suffered as a result of some unproven conspiracy charges against him constitute the mitigating factor of “other penalties and sanctions.” Resp’t’s Br. at 23. ¶38 In previous | 2 | 2009–2009 |
Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Curran
green
2 sentences2009Based on our analysis above, the Board properly struck this mitigating factor because it conflicted with the hearing officer’s finding that Vanderveen acted “intentionally” based on Ratzlaf . 22 FF 30. ¶37 Third, Vanderveen now seeks the mitigator of “other penalties and sanctions.” He argues that the three months he served in prison, his time on house arrest, as well as his other sanctions 23 and the adverse publicity he suffered as a result of some unproven conspiracy charges against him constitute the mitigating factor of “other penalties and sanctions.” Resp’t’s Br. at 23. ¶38 In previous 2009Based on our analysis above, the Board properly struck this mitigating factor because it conflicted with the hearing officer’s finding that Vanderveen acted “intentionally” based on Ratzlaf . 22 FF 30. ¶37 Third, Vanderveen now seeks the mitigator of “other penalties and sanctions.” He argues that the three months he served in prison, his time on house arrest, as well as his other sanctions 23 and the adverse publicity he suffered as a result of some unproven conspiracy charges against him constitute the mitigating factor of “other penalties and sanctions.” Resp’t’s Br. at 23. ¶38 In previous | 2 | 2009–2009 |
State v. Warner
green
2 sentences2000Warner, 125 Wash.2d at 891 , 889 P.2d 479 . 2000Warner, 125 Wn.2d at 891 . | 2 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Motherwell
green
2 sentences1999Nevertheless, the reporting requirement continues to apply to those church officials who are engaged in "encouraging or promoting the health, welfare, support or education of children, or providing social services to adults or families, whether in an individual capacity, or as an employee or agent of any public or private organization or institution." State v. Motherwell, 114 Wash.2d 353, 357 , 788 P.2d 1066 (1990) (citing former RCW 26.44.020(8)). 1999Nevertheless, the reporting requirement continues to apply to those church officials who are engaged in "encouraging or promoting the health, welfare, support or education of children, or providing social services to adults or families, whether in an individual capacity, or as an employee or agent of any public or private organization or institution." State v. Motherwell, 114 Wash.2d 353, 357 , 788 P.2d 1066 (1990) (citing former RCW 26.44.020(8)). | 2 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Durrett
green
1 sentence2018In Durrett, the defendant failed multiple times to report weekly in violation of RCW 9A.44.130(6)(b). 150 Wn. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State ex rel. Public Disclosure Commission v. Permanent Offense
green
1 sentence2017Permanent Offense, 136 Wn. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Radan
green
1 sentence2011This makes no sense; if a trial judge lacks authority to restore gun rights to a sex offender, surely a trial court’s decision to terminate a reporting requirement cannot become an “equivalent” procedure that would permit the trial court to do what the legislature has specifically prohibited in the same statute. ¶16 The majority says, though, that its decision is supported by our decision in State v. Radan, 143 Wn.2d 323 , 21 P.3d 255 (2001). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. Radan
green
1 sentence2011This makes no sense; if a trial judge lacks authority to restore gun rights to a sex offender, surely a trial court’s decision to terminate a reporting requirement cannot become an “equivalent” procedure that would permit the trial court to do what the legislature has specifically prohibited in the same statute. ¶16 The majority says, though, that its decision is supported by our decision in State v. Radan, 143 Wn.2d 323 , 21 P.3d 255 (2001). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Matter of Disciplinary Proceeding Against Perez-Pena
green
1 sentence2009Based on our analysis above, the Board properly struck this mitigating factor because it conflicted with the hearing officer's finding that Vanderveen acted "intentionally" based on Ratzlaf . [22] FF 30. ¶ 37 Third, Vanderveen now seeks the mitigator of "other penalties and sanctions." He argues that the three months he served in prison, his time on house arrest, as well as his other sanctions [23] and the adverse publicity he suffered as a result of some unproven conspiracy charges against him constitute the mitigating factor of "other penalties and sanctions." Resp't's Br. at 23. ¶ 38 In pre | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Scannell v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences1983Scannell v. Seattle, 97 Wn.2d 701 , 648 P.2d 435 (1982). 1983Scannell v. Seattle, 97 Wn.2d 701 , 648 P.2d 435 (1982). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.