10 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1905–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harlan v. Industrial Commissiongreen2 sentences1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). 1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). | 2 | 3 |
Brofman v. Industrial Commissiongreen2 sentences1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). 1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). | 1 | 2 |
Padilla v. Industrial Com'n of Coloradogreen2 sentences1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally "the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award." Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). 1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). | 1 | 2 |
In Re Marriage of Duriegreen1 sentence2025See In re Marriage of Durie, 2020 CO 7, ¶ 32 (the moving party bears the burden to demonstrate their entitlement to relief by a preponderance of the evidence). | 1 | 1 |
Nunn v. Mid-Century Insurance Co.green1 sentence2021Although Nunn requires a finding of bad faith before a stipulated judgment may be enforced against the insurer as the measure of damages for a bad faith claim, Nunn, 244 P.3d at 120 (“[W]e have held that a pretrial stipulated judgment cannot be enforced against an insurer in the absence of a determination of bad faith . . . .”), whether an insured has breached an insurance contract is a different question. | 1 | 1 |
Bertagnolli v. Association of Trial Lawyers Assurancegreen1 sentence2002In Bertagnolli v. Ass’n of Trial Lawyers Assurance, 934 P.2d 916, 918 (Colo.App.1997), a division of this court interpreted a similar indemnity policy, concluding that “[b]y its plain terms, the policy does not impose on insurer a duty to defend; to the contrary, it specifically states that insurer has no such obligation.” The trial court here properly relied on Bertagnolli in concluding that the policies in question did not impose upon American Empire or First State a duty to defend Cotter. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
University of Denver v. Industrial Com'n of Colo.
green
2 sentences1989Also, we had previously held in University of Denver v. Industrial Commission, 138 Colo. 505 , 335 P.2d 292 (1959), that, in the context of workers’ compensation agreements, “parties cannot by private contract abrogate statutory requirements or conditions affecting the public policy of the state.” Id. at 509 , 335 P.2d at 294 . 3 Therefore, based upon the purposes, structure, and language of the workers’ compensation statutes, as set forth in the statutes themselves and in our decisions applying those statutes, we ultimately concluded in Padilla that the authority of the Director to reopen cla 1989Also, we had previously held in University of Denver v. Industrial Commission, 138 Colo. 505 , 335 P.2d 292 (1959), that, in the context of workers’ compensation agreements, “parties cannot by private contract abrogate statutory requirements or conditions affecting the public policy of the state.” Id. at 509 , 335 P.2d at 294 . 3 Therefore, based upon the purposes, structure, and language of the workers’ compensation statutes, as set forth in the statutes themselves and in our decisions applying those statutes, we ultimately concluded in Padilla that the authority of the Director to reopen cla | 2 | 1985–1989 |
Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). 1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). | 2 | 1985–1989 |
Claim of Brunetti v. Industrial Commission
green
2 sentences2005Employer argues that the holding in Brunetti v. Industrial Commission, 670 P.2d 1246 (Colo.App.1983), compels the conclusion that a claimant’s acceptance of a lump sum implies acceptance of a FAL and therefore constitutes a settlement or waiver of the right to challenge the FAL. 2005Employer argues that the holding in Brunetti v. Industrial Commission, 670 P.2d 1246 (Colo.App.1983), compels the conclusion that a claimant's acceptance of a lump sum implies acceptance of a FAL and therefore constitutes a settlement or waiver of the right to challenge the FAL. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Scognamillo v. Olsen
green
1 sentence1995We therefore agree with the trial court that the defendants in this case established an exception to the rule set forth in Scognamillo, supra. *582 Here, Miller stipulated to entry of a judgment for $1.2 million against him, while the passenger’s widow agreed in exchange to enter into a covenant not to execute against the judgment. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Woodward v. Molander
green
2 sentences1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally "the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award." Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). 1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer & Industrial Commission
neutral
2 sentences1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally "the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award." Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). 1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor
neutral
2 sentences1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). 1989Key among these prior decisions were those recognizing that generally “the settlement of a claim is equivalent to an award.” Id. (citing Harlan v. Industrial Commission, 167 Colo. 413 , 447 P.2d 1009 (1968); Colorado Fuel & Iron Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 151 Colo. 18 , 379 P.2d 153 (1962); Brofman v. Industrial Commission, 117 Colo. 248 , 186 P.2d 584 (1947); Independence Coffee & Spice Co. v. Taylor, 97 Colo. 242 , 48 P.2d 798 (1935); London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. Sauer, 92 Colo. 565 , 22 P.2d 624 (1933)). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Question Submitted by the United States District Court for the District of Colorado Concerning Section 13-50.5-101, C.R.S. 1973 v. Vail Associates, Inc.
green
2 sentences1985Our Supreme Court ruled in In re Question Submitted by U.S. District Court, 196 Colo. 392 , 586 P.2d 224 (1978) that: “[N]o cause of action accrues to a joint tortfeasor until there has been a judgment against him or a settlement of the claim. 1985Our Supreme Court ruled in In re Question Submitted by U.S. District Court, 196 Colo. 392 , 586 P.2d 224 (1978) that: “[N]o cause of action accrues to a joint tortfeasor until there has been a judgment against him or a settlement of the claim. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Shapter v. Pillar
neutral
1 sentence1905Dr. Hill, the physician who attended upon plaintiff during this time, after fully stating his physical and mental condition, was asked the following question: “Doctor, I wish you would tell the jury what the fact was, in your judgment; as to whether Mr. Scott, the plaintiff, was or was not able, in the month of April, 1901, to transact business, including such business as the settlement of the claim on account of the damages that he had sustained, if any, by reason of injuries from which he was suffering.” And, over objection, he answered: “I should say he was not.” The rule is settled in this | 1 | 1905–1905 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.