Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1895–2024 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Caba v. Weaknechtgreen2 sentences2024See id. at 691 (analyzing the appellant’s challenge to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6106 under Article I, Section 21 pursuant to the same framework as that of the Second Amendment); see also Caba v. Weaknecht, 64 A.3d 39, 53 (Pa. Commw. 2013); Perry v. State Civ. 2024Third, a review of case law promulgated throughout the Commonwealth reveals that, when confronted with a claim that a statute is violative of both the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 21 of Pennsylvania’s Constitution, Pennsylvania courts engage in a singular analysis, suggesting that both provisions offer the same protection.13 See id. at 691 (analyzing the appellant’s challenge to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6106 under Article I, Section 21 pursuant to the same framework as that of the Second Amendment); see also Caba v. Weaknecht, 64 A.3d 39, 53 (Pa. Commw. 2013) | 2 | 2 |
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Eilberggreen2 sentences2012Id. 2005Id. at 1197. 2 It is beyond cavil that the unique posture of Melograne as a judicial official makes his offense even more serious than Eilberg’s for the purpose of attorney discipline. | 1 | 2 |
Commonwealth v. McKowngreen1 sentence2024Third, a review of case law promulgated throughout the Commonwealth reveals that, when confronted with a claim that a statute is violative of both the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution and Article I, Section 21 of Pennsylvania’s Constitution, Pennsylvania courts engage in a singular analysis, suggesting that both provisions offer the same protection.13 See id. at 691 (analyzing the appellant’s challenge to 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 6106 under Article I, Section 21 pursuant to the same framework as that of the Second Amendment); see also Caba v. Weaknecht, 64 A.3d 39, 53 (Pa. Commw. 2013) | 1 | 1 |
Estate of Ghaner v. Bindigreen1 sentence2023See id. at 590 . | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Bennergreen1 sentence2023See Commonwealth v. Benner, 147 A.3d 915, 919 (Pa. Super. 2016). -4- J-S10012-23 As noted above, Robinson raises a singular claim of counsel’s ineffectiveness on appeal. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Andrulewiczgreen2 sentences2023See Commonwealth v. Andrulewicz, 911 A.2d 162 , 165 (Pa. Super. 2006) (applying sufficiency of evidence standard to claim challenging denial of motion for judgment of acquittal). -8- J-S08018-23 developed a three-part test for an EWOC conviction. 2023See Commonwealth v. Andrulewicz, 911 A.2d 162, 165 (Pa. Super. 2006) (applying sufficiency of evidence standard to claim challenging denial of motion for judgment of acquittal). -8- J-S08018-23 developed a three-part test for an EWOC conviction. | 1 | 1 |
Feleccia, A. v. Lackawanna Collegegreen1 sentence2021Feleccia v. Lackawanna Coll., 156 A.3d 1200, 1213 (Pa. Super. 2017). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wagner v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
green
1 sentence2023Wagner, 83 A.3d at 1098 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State v. Markins
green
1 sentence1895To this point the language of the court in State v. Markins, 95 Ind. 464 , is so pertinent that we quote it: “ It would be a singular rule that would admit evidence of lascivious conduct and yet exclude evidence of acts which of all the series supplies the strongest evidence that the crime charged was one likely to be committed. | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.