Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1910–2024 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Department of Highways & Public Transportation v. Paynegreen1 sentence2024Transp. v. Payne, 838 S.W.2d 235, 241 (Tex. 1992). | 1 | 1 |
Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. Browngreen2 sentences2024“For an individual, the paradigm forum for the exercise of general jurisdiction is the individual’s domicile[.]” Id. at 924 ; Gaddy v. Fenenbock, 652 S.W.3d 860 , 868 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2022, no pet.) (discussing “at home” paradigm as it applies to individual trust beneficiary). 2024We therefore conduct a singular analysis of personal jurisdiction for all the claims Marsha asserts in her petition. 6 Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011). | 1 | 1 |
Baylor Scott and White, Hillcrest Medical Center v. Ruthen James Weems Iiigreen1 sentence2021See Baylor Scott & White, 575 S.W.3d at 363 ; Loaisiga, 379 S.W.3d at 252–53. | 1 | 1 |
Lozman v. City of Riviera Beachgreen1 sentence2017Lozman v. City of Riviera, 568 U.S. 115, 145 (2008). 7 Though the vessel-in-navigation issue is couched as a singular requirement, two distinct situations can arise. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Loaisiga v. Cerda
green
1 sentence2021See Baylor Scott & White, 575 S.W.3d at 363 ; Loaisiga, 379 S.W.3d at 252–53. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Lawyers Trust Company v. City of Houston
green
1 sentence2013But, as said in 4 Thompson on Real Property, Section 2123, p. 668, it is incumbent upon the grantee to allege and prove such lapse of time.” Lawyers Trust Co., 359 S.W.2d at 891 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Roberts v. Geosource Drilling Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence1997Leal sued Patterson on a number of theories that were ultimately reduced to the singular claim of promissory estoppel, premised on the case of Roberts v. Geosource Drilling Services, 757 S.W.2d 48 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1988, no writ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Markins
green
1 sentence1910To this point the language of the court in State v. Markins, 95 Ind. 464 , is so pertinent that we quote it: `It would be a singular rule that would admit evidence of lascivious conduct and yet exclude evidence of acts which, of all the series, supplies the strongest evidence that the crime charged was one likely to be committed. | 1 | 1910–1910 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.