Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
9 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1934–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., Simmons v. State, 105 So.3d 475, 503 (Fla.2012) (reviewing the claim that counsel failed to properly investigate and failed to present certain mitigation witnesses as a singular claim and reviewing the prejudice from this deficiency on the whole); Robinson v. State, 95 So.3d 171, 177 (Fla.2012) (same); Franqui v. State, 59 So.3d 82, 98 (Fla.2011) (reviewing Strickland claims individually and cumulatively after determining that counsel may have been deficient in failing to object to multiple prosecutorial comments). 2014See, e.g., Simmons v. State, 105 So. 3d 475, 503 (Fla. 2012) (reviewing the claim that counsel failed to properly investigate and failed to present certain mitigation witnesses as a singular claim and reviewing the prejudice from this deficiency on the whole); Robinson v. State, 95 So. 3d 171, 177 (Fla. 2012) (same); Franqui v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 98 (Fla. 2011) (reviewing Strickland claims individually and cumulatively after determining that counsel may have been deficient in failing to object to multiple prosecutorial comments). | 1 | 1 |
Simmons v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., Simmons v. State, 105 So.3d 475, 503 (Fla.2012) (reviewing the claim that counsel failed to properly investigate and failed to present certain mitigation witnesses as a singular claim and reviewing the prejudice from this deficiency on the whole); Robinson v. State, 95 So.3d 171, 177 (Fla.2012) (same); Franqui v. State, 59 So.3d 82, 98 (Fla.2011) (reviewing Strickland claims individually and cumulatively after determining that counsel may have been deficient in failing to object to multiple prosecutorial comments). 2014See, e.g., Simmons v. State, 105 So. 3d 475, 503 (Fla. 2012) (reviewing the claim that counsel failed to properly investigate and failed to present certain mitigation witnesses as a singular claim and reviewing the prejudice from this deficiency on the whole); Robinson v. State, 95 So. 3d 171, 177 (Fla. 2012) (same); Franqui v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 98 (Fla. 2011) (reviewing Strickland claims individually and cumulatively after determining that counsel may have been deficient in failing to object to multiple prosecutorial comments). | 1 | 1 |
Franqui v. Stategreen2 sentences2014See, e.g., Simmons v. State, 105 So.3d 475, 503 (Fla.2012) (reviewing the claim that counsel failed to properly investigate and failed to present certain mitigation witnesses as a singular claim and reviewing the prejudice from this deficiency on the whole); Robinson v. State, 95 So.3d 171, 177 (Fla.2012) (same); Franqui v. State, 59 So.3d 82, 98 (Fla.2011) (reviewing Strickland claims individually and cumulatively after determining that counsel may have been deficient in failing to object to multiple prosecutorial comments). 2014See, e.g., Simmons v. State, 105 So. 3d 475, 503 (Fla. 2012) (reviewing the claim that counsel failed to properly investigate and failed to present certain mitigation witnesses as a singular claim and reviewing the prejudice from this deficiency on the whole); Robinson v. State, 95 So. 3d 171, 177 (Fla. 2012) (same); Franqui v. State, 59 So. 3d 82, 98 (Fla. 2011) (reviewing Strickland claims individually and cumulatively after determining that counsel may have been deficient in failing to object to multiple prosecutorial comments). | 1 | 1 |
Akasu v. Powergreen2 sentences1998In Akasu v. Power, 325 Mass. 497 , 91 N.E.2d 224, 227 (Mass.1950), the Massachusetts Supreme Court quoted with approval the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Pinkum v. City of Eau Claire, 81 Wis. 301, 309 , 51 N.W. 550, 553 (Wis.1892), holding: It would be a singular rule of law which would forever prevent the owner in fee of lands from questioning the right of another to maintain an easement upon his land, *1192 when there existed a violation of the express conditions upon which the easement was granted. 1998In Akasu v. Power, 325 Mass. 497 , 91 N.E.2d 224, 227 (Mass.1950), the Massachusetts Supreme Court quoted with approval the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Pinkum v. City of Eau Claire, 81 Wis. 301, 309 , 51 N.W. 550, 553 (Wis.1892), holding: It would be a singular rule of law which would forever prevent the owner in fee of lands from questioning the right of another to maintain an easement upon his land, *1192 when there existed a violation of the express conditions upon which the easement was granted. | 1 | 1 |
Pinkum v. City of Eau Clairegreen2 sentences1998In Akasu v. Power, 325 Mass. 497 , 91 N.E.2d 224, 227 (Mass.1950), the Massachusetts Supreme Court quoted with approval the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Pinkum v. City of Eau Claire, 81 Wis. 301, 309 , 51 N.W. 550, 553 (Wis.1892), holding: It would be a singular rule of law which would forever prevent the owner in fee of lands from questioning the right of another to maintain an easement upon his land, *1192 when there existed a violation of the express conditions upon which the easement was granted. 1998In Akasu v. Power, 325 Mass. 497 , 91 N.E.2d 224, 227 (Mass.1950), the Massachusetts Supreme Court quoted with approval the Supreme Court of Wisconsin in Pinkum v. City of Eau Claire, 81 Wis. 301, 309 , 51 N.W. 550, 553 (Wis.1892), holding: It would be a singular rule of law which would forever prevent the owner in fee of lands from questioning the right of another to maintain an easement upon his land, *1192 when there existed a violation of the express conditions upon which the easement was granted. | 1 | 1 |
Michie v. Stategreen1 sentence1995See Michie v. State, 632 So.2d 1106, 1108 (Fla. 2d DCA 1994) ("[T]raffic offenses such as driving under the influence or driving with a suspended license are `continuing offenses' permitting a single conviction per episode."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hall v. State
neutral
2 sentences1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . 1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Whitney v. State
green
2 sentences1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . 1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Lawson v. State
green
2 sentences1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . 1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Weeks v. State
neutral
2 sentences1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . 1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Richardson v. State
green
2 sentences1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . 1983Whitney v. State, 184 So.2d 207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), and cases collected therein; Lawson v. State, 231 So.2d 205 ; Richardson v. State, 202 So.2d 137 ; Weeks v. State, 201 So.2d 764 ; Hall v. State, 183 So.2d 277 . | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Western Union Telegraph Company v. Suit
neutral
1 sentence2019The case that the Flea Market court relied upon was Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Suit, 15 So. 2d 33 (Fla. 1943), which, as best as we can tell, appears to be the case of origin in Florida for this singular rule.6 5Cf. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Roberts v. State
neutral
2 sentences2014The singular exception is Roberts v. State, 821 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002), in which Roberts successfully argued that the trial court lacked statutory authority to retain jurisdiction over one-third of his life sentence. 2014Although we granted this limited relief, we also denied relief on the other claims asserted in that appeal, noting "[a]ll other issues raised by Roberts are successive and have previously been denied.” Id. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Peterson, Howell & Heather v. O'NEILL
green
1 sentence1983The trial court’s discretion was therefore so obviously properly exercised under Sec. 47.-122, Fla.Stat. (1981), e.g., Peterson, Howell & Heather v. O’Neill, 314 So.2d 808 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975), that this appeal is entirely frivolous. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Midland Motor Car Co. v. Willys-Overland, Inc.
green
2 sentences1934Midland Motor Car Co. v. Willys-Overland, Ins., 101 Fla. 837 , 132 Sou. 1934Midland Motor Car Co. v. Willys-Overland, Ins., 101 Fla. 837 , 132 Sou. | 1 | 1934–1934 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.