10 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Tugglegreen2 sentences2000State v. Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tenn. 1982). 2000State v. Tuggle, 639 S.W.2d 913, 914 (Tenn. 1982). | 4 | 4 |
Darion Turner v. Kenneth Romanowskigreen2 sentences2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 , 932 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir.2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir.2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir.2011). 2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929, 932 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir. 2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir. 2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir. 2011). | 2 | 2 |
Lee v. Lampertgreen2 sentences2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 , 932 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir.2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir.2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir.2011). 2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929, 932 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir. 2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir. 2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir. 2011). | 2 | 2 |
San Martin v. McNeilgreen2 sentences2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 , 932 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir.2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir.2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir.2011). 2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929, 932 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir. 2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir. 2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir. 2011). | 2 | 2 |
Sandoval v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929 , 932 (9th Cir.2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir.2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir.2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir.2011). 2012See Lee v. Lampert, 653 F.3d 929, 932 (9th Cir. 2011) (en banc); Sandoval v. Jones, 447 F. App’x 1, 4-5 (10th Cir. 2011); San Martin v. McNeil, 633 F.3d 1257, 1267-68 (11th Cir. 2011); Turner v. Romanowski, 409 F. App’x 922, 926 (6th Cir. 2011). | 2 | 2 |
cluster 756745green2 sentences2012Id.; see also Babbitt v. Woodford, 177 F.3d 744, 746 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (stating that the AEDPA’s actual innocence exception to the bar on successive claims “permit[s] a petitioner to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, ‘but for constitutional error, no reasonable juror would have found the petitioner eligible for the death penalty under the applicable state law’ ” (quoting Thompson, 151 F.3d at 923)); Bryan A. Stevenson, The Politics of Fear and Death: Successive Problems in Capital Federal Habeas Corpus Cases, 77 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 699, 777 (2002) (“Some courts view [the AEDP 2012Id.; see also Babbitt v. Woodford, 177 F.3d 744, 746 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (stating that the AEDPA’s actual innocence exception to the bar on successive claims “permit[s] a petitioner to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, ‘but for constitutional error, no reasonable juror would have found the petitioner eligible for the death penalty under the applicable state law’” (quoting Thompson, 151 F.3d at 923)); Bryan A. Stevenson, The Politics of Fear and Death: Successive Problems in Capital Federal Habeas Corpus Cases, 77 N.Y.U. | 2 | 2 |
Manuel Pina Babbitt v. Jeanne Woodford, Acting Warden, California State Prison at San Quentingreen2 sentences2012Id.; see also Babbitt v. Woodford, 177 F.3d 744, 746 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam) (stating that the AEDPA’s actual innocence exception to the bar on successive claims “permit[s] a petitioner to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, ‘but for constitutional error, no reasonable juror would have found the petitioner eligible for the death penalty under the applicable state law’ ” (quoting Thompson, 151 F.3d at 923)); Bryan A. Stevenson, The Politics of Fear and Death: Successive Problems in Capital Federal Habeas Corpus Cases, 77 N.Y.U.L.Rev. 699, 777 (2002) (“Some courts view [the AEDP 2012Id.; see also Babbitt v. Woodford, 177 F.3d 744, 746 (9th Cir. 1999) (per curiam) (stating that the AEDPA’s actual innocence exception to the bar on successive claims “permit[s] a petitioner to establish by clear and convincing evidence that, ‘but for constitutional error, no reasonable juror would have found the petitioner eligible for the death penalty under the applicable state law’” (quoting Thompson, 151 F.3d at 923)); Bryan A. Stevenson, The Politics of Fear and Death: Successive Problems in Capital Federal Habeas Corpus Cases, 77 N.Y.U. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
David Keen v. State of Tennessee
green
2 sentences2015The court also held that ―a claim alleging ineligibility for the death penalty does not qualify as an actual innocence claim[.]‖ Id. at 613 . 2014The court further held that “a claim alleging ineligibility for the death penalty does not qualify as an actual innocence claim.” Id. at 613 . | 4 | 2014–2015 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.