8 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2018–2026 7 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Newton v. Kellygreen2 sentences2024See Newton v. Kelly, 328 Or App 78, 79 , 536 P3d 1098 (2023), rev den, 371 Or 825 (2024) (recognizing that assuming an actual innocence claim exists, it would require an “exacting stan- dard of proof”). 2024See Newton v. Kelly, 328 Or App 78, 79 , 536 P3d 1098 (2023), rev den, 371 Or 825 (2024) (recognizing that assuming an actual innocence claim exists, it would require an “exacting stan- dard of proof”). | 1 | 1 |
Portfolio Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Sandersgreen1 sentence2023See id. at 739 (concluding that an affidavit from an accomplice which was contradicted by other evidence at trial was “far from the type of reliable evidence” needed to establish an actual innocence claim). | 1 | 1 |
Eklof v. Stewardgreen2 sentences2023See Eklof v. Steward, 360 Or 717, 734 , 385 P3d 1074 (2016) (trial court erred in granting summary judgment when state’s motion did not put the pertinent factual matters at issue); Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc., 355 Or 319, 326 , 325 P3d Nonprecedential Memo Op: 326 Or App 100 (2023) 109 707 (2014) (parties seeking summary judgment must raise by motion the issues on which they contend they are entitled to prevail as a matter of law and parties opposing summary judgment have the burden of producing evidence that cre- ates a material issue of fact only as to those issues). 2023See Eklof v. Steward, 360 Or 717, 734 , 385 P3d 1074 (2016) (trial court erred in granting summary judgment when state’s motion did not put the pertinent factual matters at issue); Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc., 355 Or 319, 326 , 325 P3d Nonprecedential Memo Op: 326 Or App 100 (2023) 109 707 (2014) (parties seeking summary judgment must raise by motion the issues on which they contend they are entitled to prevail as a matter of law and parties opposing summary judgment have the burden of producing evidence that cre- ates a material issue of fact only as to those issues). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. B. J. P.
neutral
2 sentences2026P., 339 Or App 134, 138 , 566 P3d 1187 (2025) (an Alford plea “is equivalent to a ‘no contest’ plea under ORS 135.335(1)(c)”). 2 Petitioner also asserted an actual innocence claim. 2026P., 339 Or App 134, 138 , 566 P3d 1187 (2025) (an Alford plea “is equivalent to a ‘no contest’ plea under ORS 135.335(1)(c)”). 2 Petitioner also asserted an actual innocence claim. | 2 | 2026–2026 |
Perkins v. Fhuere
neutral
2 sentences2025Relator opposed the second option proposed by the state, contending that Cite as 374 Or 575 (2025) 583 II. 2025Relator opposed the second option proposed by the state, contending that Cite as 374 Or 575 (2025) 583 II. | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Parrish v. Fhuere
neutral
1 sentence2024Nonprecedential Memo Op: 334 Or App 688 (2024) 691 petitioner’s version of events, he has not demonstrated prej- udice. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Compton v. Premo
neutral
1 sentence2023See Eklof v. Steward, 360 Or 717, 734 , 385 P3d 1074 (2016) (trial court erred in granting summary judgment when state’s motion did not put the pertinent factual matters at issue); Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc., 355 Or 319, 326 , 325 P3d Nonprecedential Memo Op: 326 Or App 100 (2023) 109 707 (2014) (parties seeking summary judgment must raise by motion the issues on which they contend they are entitled to prevail as a matter of law and parties opposing summary judgment have the burden of producing evidence that cre- ates a material issue of fact only as to those issues). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc.
green
1 sentence2023See Eklof v. Steward, 360 Or 717, 734 , 385 P3d 1074 (2016) (trial court erred in granting summary judgment when state’s motion did not put the pertinent factual matters at issue); Two Two v. Fujitec America, Inc., 355 Or 319, 326 , 325 P3d Nonprecedential Memo Op: 326 Or App 100 (2023) 109 707 (2014) (parties seeking summary judgment must raise by motion the issues on which they contend they are entitled to prevail as a matter of law and parties opposing summary judgment have the burden of producing evidence that cre- ates a material issue of fact only as to those issues). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
State Ex Rel. Amrine v. Roper
green
1 sentence2018Amrine v. Roper , 102 S.W.3d 541 , 548 (Mo. 2003) (explaining that a "freestanding claim of actual innocence is evaluated on the assumption that the trial was constitutionally adequate" such that "the evidence of actual innocence must be strong enough to undermine the basis for the conviction so as to make the petitioner's continued incarceration and eventual execution manifestly unjust even though the conviction was otherwise the product of a fair trial"; "[a]t the same time, because an actual innocence claim necessarily implies a breakdown in the adversarial process, * * * [t]he appropriate | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.