9 Kentucky opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Island Creek Coal Co. v. Davis
neutral
2 sentences1992Island Creek Coal Co. v. Davis, Ky.App., 761 S.W.2d 179 (1988). 1991U.S. Steel v. Wells, supra; Island Creek Coal v. Davis, Ky.App., 761 S.W.2d 179 (1988). | 2 | 1991–1992 |
Miller v. Tema Isenmann, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024The Kentucky Supreme Court held that the ALJ relied on objective evidence -10- showing that the claimant had been exposed to carcinogenic chemicals. 542 S.W.3d at 271-72 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Shields v. Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co.
green
2 sentences2023Thus, the Board’s previous recommendation that the ALJ “clearly outline his decision as it relates to an occupational disease claim, not as an injury claim” was “unavailing dicta.” -6- explanation clearly informs all parties of the basis for his decision as required by Shields v. Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co., 634 S.W.2d 440 (Ky. App. 1982). 2023Thus, the Board’s previous recommendation that the ALJ “clearly outline his decision as it relates to an occupational disease claim, not as an injury claim” was “unavailing dicta.” -6- explanation clearly informs all parties of the basis for his decision as required by Shields v. Pittsburgh & Midway Coal Mining Co., 634 S.W.2d 440 (Ky. App. 1982). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Tanks v. Roark
green
2 sentences2006Consistent with the mechanism by which repetitive exposure to hazardous noise destroys the membranes of the inner ear, KRS 342.7305(4) characterizes hearing loss caused by such exposure as being an “injury.” See Caldwell Tanks v. Roark, 104 S.W.3d 753 (Ky.2003). 2006Consistent with the mechanism by which repetitive exposure to hazardous noise destroys the membranes of the inner ear, KRS 342.7305(4) characterizes hearing loss caused by such exposure as being an "injury." See Caldwell Tanks v. Roark, 104 S.W.3d 753 (Ky.2003). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Blue Diamond Coal Company v. Stepp
green
1 sentence2000The Court noted that it did not believe the evidence supported a finding that the claimant had experienced such a distinct manifestation of the disease, referring to Blue Diamond Coal Co. v. Stepp, Ky., 445 S.W.2d 866 (1969), where the Supreme Court stated that: [T]he work[er] should be deemed to be disabled from silicosis, for the purpose of notice requirements, when circumstances exist from which the workman realizes or reasonably should realize that his capacity to perform his work is impaired by reason of silicosis. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Stambaugh v. Cedar Creek Mining Company
green
1 sentence1997In Stambaugh v. Cedar Creek Mining Co., Ky., 488 S.W.2d 681 (1972), a claimant’s occupational disease claim had been dismissed on the merits. | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Beale v. Shepherd
green
1 sentence1995See Tele-dyne-Wirz, supra; Beale v. Shepherd, Ky., 809 S.W.2d 845 (1991). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Osborne Mining Corporation v. Blackburn
green
1 sentence1994Estep Coal Co. v. Ward, Ky., 421 S.W.2d 367 (1967); Osborne v. Blackburn, Ky., 397 S.W.2d 144 (1965). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Estep Coal Company v. Ward
green
1 sentence1994Estep Coal Co. v. Ward, Ky., 421 S.W.2d 367 (1967); Osborne v. Blackburn, Ky., 397 S.W.2d 144 (1965). | 1 | 1994–1994 |
United States Steel Corp. v. Wells
neutral
1 sentence1991U.S. Steel v. Wells, supra; Island Creek Coal v. Davis, Ky.App., 761 S.W.2d 179 (1988). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.