Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
16 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1981–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rainey v. City of Charlottegreen2 sentences2022App. 594, 595 , 785 S.E.2d 766, 768 (2016) (holding that the timely filing of an occupational disease claim under section 97-58(c) is “an issue of jurisdiction for the commission”); RIMMER V. 2022App. 594, 595 , 785 S.E.2d 766, 768 (2016) (holding that the timely filing of an occupational disease claim under section 97-58(c) is “an issue of jurisdiction for the commission”); RIMMER V. | 2 | 2 |
Reinhardt v. Women's Pavilion, Inc.green2 sentences2022TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL 2022-NCCOA-57 Opinion of the Court Reinhardt v. Women’s Pavilion, Inc., 102 N.C. 2022TOWN OF CHAPEL HILL 2022-NCCOA-57 Opinion of the Court Reinhardt v. Women’s Pavilion, Inc., 102 N.C. | 2 | 2 |
Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarngreen2 sentences2015Our Supreme Court explained the elements of an occupational disease claim in Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983). 2015Our Supreme Court explained the elements of an occupational disease claim in Rutledge v. Tultex Corp./Kings Yarn, 308 N.C. 85 , 301 S.E.2d 359 (1983). | 1 | 3 |
Woody v. THOMASVILLE UPHOLSTERY EMPLOYERgreen2 sentences2004The court held that abusive treatment "can occur with any employee in any industry or profession, or indeed, in similar abusive relationships outside the workplace[.]" Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc ., 146 N.C. 2003See Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc., 355 N.C. 483 , 562 S.E.2d 422 (2002) (per curiam) (adopting the dissent in Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc., 146 N.C. | 1 | 2 |
Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.green2 sentences2011See Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980). 2011See Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 , 265 S.E.2d 389 (1980). | 1 | 1 |
Wilder v. Amatex Corp.green2 sentences2010See also Wilder v. Amatex Corp., 314 N.C. 550, 560 , 336 S.E.2d 66, 72 (1985), holding that, for purposes of determining the date upon which the statute of limitations for an occupational disease claim begins to run, the date of injury was the date of diagnosis: [T]he legislature and the Court have recognized that exposure to disease-causing agents is not itself an injury. . . . 2010See also Wilder v. Amatex Corp., 314 N.C. 550, 560 , 336 S.E.2d 66, 72 (1985), holding that, for purposes of determining the date upon which the statute of limitations for an occupational disease claim begins to run, the date of injury was the date of diagnosis: [T]he legislature and the Court have recognized that exposure to disease-causing agents is not itself an injury. . . . | 1 | 1 |
Hansel v. Sherman Textilesgreen2 sentences2007“The denial of compensation may be predicated upon the failure of the claimant to prove any one of the elements of compensability.” Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 54 , 283 S.E.2d 101, 107 (1981). 2007“The denial of compensation may be predicated upon the failure of the claimant to prove any one of the elements of compensability.” Hansel v. Sherman Textiles, 304 N.C. 44, 54 , 283 S.E.2d 101, 107 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Bradley v. Hidden Valley Transportation, Inc.green1 sentence2003See Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc., 355 N.C. 483 , 562 S.E.2d 422 (2002) (per curiam) (adopting the dissent in Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc., 146 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery Inc.green1 sentence2003See Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc., 355 N.C. 483 , 562 S.E.2d 422 (2002) (per curiam) (adopting the dissent in Woody v. Thomasville Upholstery, Inc., 146 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Terrell v. Terminix Services, Inc.
green
2 sentences2010Terrell v. Terminix Servs. , 142 N.C. 2007Terrell v. Terminix Services , 142 N.C. | 2 | 2007–2010 |
Booker v. Duke Medical Center
green
2 sentences1997Booker v. Duke Medical Center , 297 N.C. 458 , 256 S.E.2d 189 (1979). 1997Booker v. Duke Medical Center , 297 N.C. 458 , 256 S.E.2d 189 (1979). | 2 | 1997–1997 |
McCubbins v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.
green
1 sentence2013In support of his contention plaintiff cites to the following statement in McCubbins v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.: Though the two year time limit for timely filing is a jurisdictional requisite, without which the Industrial Commission may not consider a workers’ compensation claim, the time does not begin to run against occupational disease claims until the employee is informed by competent medical authority of the nature and work-related cause of the disease. 79 N.C. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Matter of Elkins
neutral
1 sentence2011Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills Inc. , 308 N.C. 701 , 706 , 304 S.E.2d 215 , 218-219 (1983), rehearing denied , 311 S.E.2d 590 (N.C. 1984). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills, Inc.
green
2 sentences2011Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills Inc. , 308 N.C. 701 , 706 , 304 S.E.2d 215 , 218-219 (1983), rehearing denied , 311 S.E.2d 590 (N.C. 1984). 2011Dowdy v. Fieldcrest Mills Inc. , 308 N.C. 701 , 706 , 304 S.E.2d 215 , 218-219 (1983), rehearing denied , 311 S.E.2d 590 (N.C. 1984). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Futrell v. Resinall Corp.
green
1 sentence2007Chambers, 360 N.C. at 613 , — S.E.2d at —; Rutledge, 151 N.C. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Chambers v. Transit Management
green
2 sentences2007Our Courts have “ ‘consistently defined the third element of the Rutledge test as being met where the [plaintiff] can establish that the employment caused him to contract the disease, or where he can establish that it significantly contributed to or aggravated the disease.’ ” Chambers, 360 N.C. at 613 , —— S.E.2d at ——. 2007Chambers, 360 N.C. at 613 , — S.E.2d at —; Rutledge, 151 N.C. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Wood v. J. P. Stevens & Co.
green
2 sentences1981This latter judgment requires a conclusion of law.” Wood v. Stevens & Co., supra, 297 N.C. at 640 , 256 S.E. 2d at 695-96 . 1981This latter judgment requires a conclusion of law.” Wood v. Stevens & Co., supra, 297 N.C. at 640 , 256 S.E. 2d at 695-96 . | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.