Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
10 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peck v. Procter & Gamble Mfg. Co.
neutral
2 sentences2003LSA-R.S. 23:1031.1; Peck v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co., 586 So.2d 714 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991). 2003LSA R.S. 23:1031.1; Peck v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co., 586 So.2d 714 (La.App. 3 Cir.1991). | 4 | 1996–2003 |
Bynum v. Capital City Press, Inc.
green
2 sentences2024Bynum v. Capital City Press, 95-1395 (La. 7/2/96), 676 So. 2d 582 ; City of Bossier City v. Colvin, 45,278 (La. 2010Bynum v. Capital City Press, 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), 676 So.2d 582 ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 *1213 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/29/03), 836 So.2d 1214 . | 3 | 2003–2024 |
Coats v. American Tel. & Tel. Co.
green
2 sentences2003In Coats v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 95-2670, p. 7 (La.10/25/96), 681 So.2d 1243, 1247 , the supreme court said: In examining the merits of an occupational disease claim, the threshold question is whether or not the claimant has sustained an occupational disease resulting from causes and conditions characteristic of and peculiar to his particular trade, occupation, process, or employment. 1998The Louisiana Supreme Court noted as follows in Coats v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co., 95-2670 (La.10.25/96), 681 So.2d 1243 : In examining the merits of an occupational disease claim, the threshold question is whether or not the claimant has sustained an occupational disease resulting from causes and conditions characteristic of and peculiar to his particular trade, occupation, process, or employment. | 3 | 1998–2003 |
Lee v. Schumpert
green
1 sentence2010Bynum v. Capital City Press, 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), 676 So.2d 582 ; Lee v. Schumpert, 36,733 *1213 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/29/03), 836 So.2d 1214 . | 1 | 2010–2010 |
Mire v. RANGER PLANT CONST. COMPANY, INC.
neutral
1 sentence2003Bynum v. Capital City Press, 95-1395 (La.7/2/96), 676 So.2d 582 ; Mire v. Ranger Plant Const. Co., 01-2247 (La.App. 1 Cir. 9/27/02) , 835 So.2d 550 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Duos v. Evangeline Parish School Board
green
1 sentence2002However, another case, Duos v. Evangeline Parish School Board, 499 So.2d 1067 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1986), dealt with an occupational disease claim in which the claimant failed to file a claim with her employer within the six-month prescriptive period. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.