9 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1925–2004 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hartford v. Tannergreen2 sentences2004See Tanner, 910 P.2d at 880 (explaining that, in previous appellate proceedings in the case, the court had remanded the case because "the reasonableness of the payments made by [the surety] is a fact question that must be litigated"); City of Portland, 750 P.2d at 175 (reviewing a whether sufficient evidence supported the jury's determination of good faith under a reasonableness standard). 2004See Tanner, 910 P.2d at 880 (explaining that, in previous appellate proceedings in the case, the court had remanded the case because “the reasonableness of the payments made by [the surety] is a fact question that must be litigated”); City of Portland, 750 P.2d at 175 (reviewing a whether sufficient evidence supported the jury’s determination of good faith under a reasonableness standard). | 1 | 1 |
City of Portland v. George D. Ward & Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2004See Tanner, 910 P.2d at 880 (explaining that, in previous appellate proceedings in the case, the court had remanded the case because "the reasonableness of the payments made by [the surety] is a fact question that must be litigated"); City of Portland, 750 P.2d at 175 (reviewing a whether sufficient evidence supported the jury's determination of good faith under a reasonableness standard). 2004See Tanner, 910 P.2d at 880 (explaining that, in previous appellate proceedings in the case, the court had remanded the case because “the reasonableness of the payments made by [the surety] is a fact question that must be litigated”); City of Portland, 750 P.2d at 175 (reviewing a whether sufficient evidence supported the jury’s determination of good faith under a reasonableness standard). | 1 | 1 |
Wells v. Hillgreen2 sentences2002This is true because it was not until May 5, 1964, the issuance of garnishment, that any action was brought to enforce liability upon the securities posted in lieu of the required bond.” Wells v. Hill, 239 Ark. 979, 981 , 396 S.W.2d 946, 947 (1965). b. 2002This is true because it was not until May 5, 1964, the issuance of garnishment, that any action was brought to enforce liability upon the securities posted in lieu of the required bond.” Wells v. Hill, 239 Ark. 979, 981 , 396 S.W.2d 946, 947 (1965). b. | 1 | 1 |
Attorney Grievance Commission v. Howardgreen2 sentences2002See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Ficker, 319 Md. 305, 315 , 572 A.2d 501, 505-06 (1990)(Ficker I); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Howard, 282 Md. 515, 523 , 385 A.2d 1191, 1196 (1978). 2002See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Ficker, 319 Md. 305, 315 , 572 A.2d 501, 505-06 (1990)(Ficker I); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Howard, 282 Md. 515, 523 , 385 A.2d 1191, 1196 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. Fickergreen2 sentences2002See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Ficker, 319 Md. 305, 315 , 572 A.2d 501, 505-06 (1990)(Ficker I); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Howard, 282 Md. 515, 523 , 385 A.2d 1191, 1196 (1978). 2002See Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Ficker, 319 Md. 305, 315 , 572 A.2d 501, 505-06 (1990)(Ficker I); Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Howard, 282 Md. 515, 523 , 385 A.2d 1191, 1196 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
Montgomery County v. Phoenix Insurancegreen2 sentences1968Accord, Montgomery County v. Phoenix, 232 Md. 58 , 192 A. 2d 111 . 1968Accord, Montgomery County v. Phoenix, 232 Md. 58 , 192 A. 2d 111 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mullan Contracting Co. v. International Business MacHines Corp.
green
2 sentences1968Co. v. Sewell, supra. In Mullan Co. v. International Corp., 220 Md. 248, 151 A. 2d 906 , we held that interest was recoverable on a bond claim against the surety for a liquidated amount due and owing from the contractor. 1968Co. v. Sewell, supra. In Mullan Co. v. International Corp., 220 Md. 248, 151 A. 2d 906 , we held that interest was recoverable on a bond claim against the surety for a liquidated amount due and owing from the contractor. | 2 | 1968–1969 |
Lucky Ned Pepper's Ltd. v. Columbia Park & Recreation Ass'n
green
1 sentence1999For that proposition, appellant relies primarily on Lucky Ned Pepper’s Ltd. v. Columbia Park & Recreation Ass’n, 64 Md. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences1991In finding a constitutional violation a court is guided by the four-part balancing test set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). 1991In finding a constitutional violation a court is guided by the four-part balancing test set forth in Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514, 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182, 2192 , 33 L.Ed.2d 101 (1972). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
N. S. Stavrou, Inc. v. Beacon Supply Co.
neutral
2 sentences1988The Court noted that in order to prevail the contractor “would had to have shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence an express or implied waiver on the part of [the supplier]____” Stavrou, 249 Md. at 458 , 240 A.2d 278 . 1988The Court noted that in order to prevail the contractor “would had to have shown by a fair preponderance of the evidence an express or implied waiver on the part of [the supplier]____” Stavrou, 249 Md. at 458 , 240 A.2d 278 . | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Peerless Insurance v. Board of County Commissioners Ex Rel. Ben Dyer Associates, Inc.
green
2 sentences1969Peerless v. Prince George’s County, 248 Md. 439 , 237 A. 2d 15 ; Mullan Co. v. International Corp., 220 Md. 248 , 151 A. 2d 906 . 1969Peerless v. Prince George’s County, 248 Md. 439 , 237 A. 2d 15 ; Mullan Co. v. International Corp., 220 Md. 248 , 151 A. 2d 906 . | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. Sewell
green
1 sentence1968Co. v. Sewell, supra. In Mullan Co. v. International Corp., 220 Md. 248, 151 A. 2d 906 , we held that interest was recoverable on a bond claim against the surety for a liquidated amount due and owing from the contractor. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Goldman v. Brinton
green
1 sentence1925In the ease of Goldman v. Brinton, 90 Md. 259 , the facts were that the holder of a mechanic's lien on unfinished houses induced persons to loan money to ■complete the same by promising to waive the priority of his lien, but subsequently refused to sign snob waiver, and it was held that the holder of the lien was estopped to set. up his lien against those making the advance. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.