13 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1972–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Boothgreen2 sentences2018See id., at 524-25 , 176 A.3d 559 . 7 At the consolidated criminal trial, Waterson testified that the petitioner, Booth, and Gomez "were members of the 20 Love gang." State v. Booth , supra, 250 Conn. at 637 , 737 A.2d 404 . 2018See id., at 524-25 , 176 A.3d 559 . 7 At the consolidated criminal trial, Waterson testified that the petitioner, Booth, and Gomez "were members of the 20 Love gang." State v. Booth , supra, 250 Conn. at 637 , 737 A.2d 404 . | 1 | 1 |
Gomez v. Commissioner of Correctiongreen2 sentences2018Counsel at that time confirmed that the second count was predicated exclusively on the state's "preexisting agreement with [Smith and Valentin] to not object to the bond hearing" that allegedly existed and was not disclosed to the petitioner. 6 In Gomez v. Commissioner of Correction , 178 Conn. App. 519 , 521-22, 176 A.3d 559 (2017), this court affirmed the judgment of the habeas court denying Gomez' second petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which contained allegations that largely mirror those advanced in the present action. 2018Counsel at that time confirmed that the second count was predicated exclusively on the state's "preexisting agreement with [Smith and Valentin] to not object to the bond hearing" that allegedly existed and was not disclosed to the petitioner. 6 In Gomez v. Commissioner of Correction , 178 Conn. App. 519 , 521-22, 176 A.3d 559 (2017), this court affirmed the judgment of the habeas court denying Gomez' second petition for a writ of habeas corpus, which contained allegations that largely mirror those advanced in the present action. | 1 | 1 |
Bell v. Wolfishgreen1 sentence2015See id., 536–37; see also United States v. Salerno, supra, 481 U.S. 747 . 38 We pause to observe that, however significant the benefits at issue may be to the defendant, they necessarily constitute a less significant liberty interest than that at issue in a typical bond hearing, namely, the interest in full and unrestricted freedom from confinement. | 1 | 1 |
State v. O'Briengreen1 sentence1972See State v. O'Brien, 93 Conn. 643 , 647 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Connecticut v. Doehr
green
2 sentences1993Id. 1 The seminal case involving the constitutionality of Connecticut's prejudgment remedy procedures is Connecticut v. Doehr, 501 U.S. ___ , 115 L.Ed. 1 , 111 S.Ct. 2105 (1991). 1992A party must show more than the mere existence of a claim before subjecting an opponent to prejudgment proceedings that carry a significant risk of erroneous deprivation.” Connecticut v. Doehr, 500 U.S. , 111 S. Ct. 2105, 2117-18 , 115 L. | 2 | 1992–1993 |
Ortwein v. Schwab
green
2 sentences1976It has long been recognized that “even in criminal cases, due process does not require a State to provide an appellate system.” Ortwein v. Schwab, supra, 660 . 1976It has long been recognized that "even in criminal cases, due process does not require a State to provide an appellate system." Ortwein v. Schwab, supra, 660 . | 2 | 1976–1976 |
Brown v. FENYES
neutral
2 sentences2012If a defendant in a summary process action files a motion for use and occupancy payments, “failure to comply with the use and occupancy payments ... is a failure to comply with the bond requirement of § 47a-35a (a).” Brown v. Fenyes, 127 Conn. App. 771, 773 , 15 A.3d 1160 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 902 , 23 A.3d 1242 (2011). 2012If a defendant in a summary process action files a motion for use and occupancy payments, “failure to comply with the use and occupancy payments ... is a failure to comply with the bond requirement of § 47a-35a (a).” Brown v. Fenyes, 127 Conn. App. 771, 773 , 15 A.3d 1160 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 902 , 23 A.3d 1242 (2011). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Flannery v. SINGER ASSET FINANCE COMPANY, LLC
green
2 sentences2012If a defendant in a summary process action files a motion for use and occupancy payments, “failure to comply with the use and occupancy payments ... is a failure to comply with the bond requirement of § 47a-35a (a).” Brown v. Fenyes, 127 Conn. App. 771, 773 , 15 A.3d 1160 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 902 , 23 A.3d 1242 (2011). 2012If a defendant in a summary process action files a motion for use and occupancy payments, “failure to comply with the use and occupancy payments ... is a failure to comply with the bond requirement of § 47a-35a (a).” Brown v. Fenyes, 127 Conn. App. 771, 773 , 15 A.3d 1160 , cert. denied, 302 Conn. 902 , 23 A.3d 1242 (2011). | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Young v. Young
green
2 sentences2011In Young v. Young, 249 Conn. 482, 497 , 733 A.2d 835 (1999), the Supreme Court stated that “[fjailure to comply with the bond requirement makes the appeal voidable upon attack. . . . 2011In Young v. Young, 249 Conn. 482, 497 , 733 A.2d 835 (1999), the Supreme Court stated that “[fjailure to comply with the bond requirement makes the appeal voidable upon attack. . . . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Wolf v. Carden
neutral
2 sentences1999Initially, we recognize that “the purpose of the bond requirement is to protect the landlord in receiving rent for occupancy of the premises.” Wolf v. Carden, 30 Conn. Sup. 507, 511 , 294 A.2d 640 (1972). 1999Initially, we recognize that “the purpose of the bond requirement is to protect the landlord in receiving rent for occupancy of the premises.” Wolf v. Carden, 30 Conn. Sup. 507, 511 , 294 A.2d 640 (1972). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Wolf v. Fuller
green
2 sentences1999Therefore, “the failure to provide such a bond furnishes a sufficient ground for dismissal of the appeal.” Wolf v. Fuller, 30 Conn. Sup. 527, 534 , 298 A.2d 244 (1972). 1999Therefore, “the failure to provide such a bond furnishes a sufficient ground for dismissal of the appeal.” Wolf v. Fuller, 30 Conn. Sup. 527, 534 , 298 A.2d 244 (1972). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Roger Asay v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
green
1 sentence1999Publication to the media is ordinarily not privileged because "`[t]he salutary policy of allowing freedom of communication in judicial proceedings does not warrant or countenance the dissemination and distribution of defamatory accusations outside of the judicial proceeding.'" Kelley v. Bonney, supra, 221 Conn. 576 , quoting Asay v. Hallmark Cards, 594 F.2d 692 , 697 (8th Cir. 1989). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.
green
2 sentences1992In North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chim, Inc., 419 U.S. 601, 613 , 95 S. Ct. 719 , 42 L. 1992In North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chim, Inc., 419 U.S. 601, 613 , 95 S. Ct. 719 , 42 L. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Richard and Mary Guzman v. Western State Bank of Devils Lake, North Dakota, a North Dakota Corporation
green
1 sentence1992That court stated: “The bond requirement places a considerable impediment on any debtor who seeks to contest the attachment of any item of substantial value, and to the extent that any debtor is unable to meet the bond requirement in order to obtain a discharge hearing, the goal of minimizing the impact on the debtor of a wrongful attachment has been undermined.” Id. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Murphy v. Schwaner
green
1 sentence1972"From the nature of the contract of a guarantor or a surety, his liability is ordinarily measured by that of the principal." Murphy v. Schwaner, 84 Conn. 420 , 425 . | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Simmons v. West Haven Housing Authority
green
1 sentence1972In the light of the dismissal by the Supreme Court of the United States of the appeal in Simmons v. West Haven Housing Authority, 399 U.S. 510 , we hold that the bond requirement of Public Acts 1971, No. 316, is not violative of the defendants' constitutional rights, nor, as set forth above, does it deny them the equal protection of the laws. | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.