9 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1893–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hamlin v. Hamlingreen2 sentences2010See Hamlin v. Hamlin, 302 N.C. 478, 485 , 276 S.E.2d 381, 387 (1981). 2010See Hamlin v. Hamlin, 302 N.C. 478, 485 , 276 S.E.2d 381, 387 (1981). | 1 | 1 |
Donnell v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of Ohiogreen1 sentence2001See State v. Cummings, 346 N.C. 291, 313-14 , 488 S.E.2d 550 , *446 563 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1092 , 139 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Cummingsgreen2 sentences2001See State v. Cummings, 346 N.C. 291, 313-14 , 488 S.E.2d 550 , *446 563 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1092 , 139 L. 2001See State v. Cummings, 346 N.C. 291, 313-14 , 488 S.E.2d 550 , *446 563 (1997), cert. denied, 522 U.S. 1092 , 139 L. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Jenkinsgreen1 sentence2000See State v. Jenkins, 137 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Hardygreen2 sentences1997See State v. Hardy, 293 N.C. 105 , 235 S.E.2d 828 (1977). 1997See State v. Hardy, 293 N.C. 105 , 235 S.E.2d 828 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Will of Winbornegreen2 sentences1985See In re Will of Winborne, 231 N.C. 463 , 57 S.E.2d 795 (1950). 1985See In re Will of Winborne, 231 N.C. 463 , 57 S.E.2d 795 (1950). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Thompson
green
2 sentences2000In Thompson, 349 N.C. 483 , 508 S.E.2d 277 , the defendant was arrested at 3:45 p.m. on a Saturday. 2000In Thompson, 349 N.C. 483 , 508 S.E.2d 277 , the defendant was arrested at 3:45 p.m. on a Saturday. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
State v. Malette
green
1 sentence2000Id. at 55, 509 S.E.2d at 778 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Strong v. American Fence Construction Co.
green
2 sentences1979Relying upon the New York case of Strong v. American Fence Construction Co., 245 N.Y. 48 , 156 N.E. 92 (1927), plaintiff bases this argument upon its conviction that the bond requirement was written into this contract for the direct benefit of this plaintiff. 1979Relying upon the New York case of Strong v. American Fence Construction Co., 245 N.Y. 48 , 156 N.E. 92 (1927), plaintiff bases this argument upon its conviction that the bond requirement was written into this contract for the direct benefit of this plaintiff. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Gorrell v. Greensboro Water Supply Co.
green
2 sentences1931These sureties are not liable to the plaintiff under the terms of the bond or on the principle upon which Gorrell v. Water Supply Co., 124 N. C., 328 , 32 S. E., 720 , was decided. 1931These sureties are not liable to the plaintiff under the terms of the bond or on the principle upon which Gorrell v. Water Supply Co., 124 N. C., 328 , 32 S. E., 720 , was decided. | 1 | 1931–1931 |
Rogers v. . Moore
neutral
1 sentence1893Rogers v. Moore, 86 N. C., 85 . | 1 | 1893–1893 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.