9 Maryland opinions name it 1 courts 1896–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Maurer v. . the Peoplegreen2 sentences1998If present he may ‘have produced an impression upon the jury favorable to himself.’ ” Id., quoting Maurer v. The People, 43 N.Y. 1, 5 (1870). 1982If present he may "have produced an impression upon the jury favorable to himself." Maurer v. The People, supra, 43 N.Y. at 5 . | 1 | 2 |
Western & Atlantic Railroad v. Deitchgreen1 sentence2025Emigrant Co. v. Clark, 47 Iowa 671, 674 (1878) (“Regarding the check as a contract complete in itself, which, as all other commercial paper, it is, the correctness of this instruction cannot be doubted.”); Aurora Nat’l Bank v. Dils, 48 N.E. 19, 21 (Ind. Ct. App. 1897) (“The indorsement of a check is a distinct contract.”); Byrd Printing Co. v. Whitaker Paper Co., 70 S.E. 798, 800 (Ga. 1911) (“A check is a contract[.]”); Deal v. Atl. | 1 | 1 |
Aurora National Bank v. Dilsgreen1 sentence2025Emigrant Co. v. Clark, 47 Iowa 671, 674 (1878) (“Regarding the check as a contract complete in itself, which, as all other commercial paper, it is, the correctness of this instruction cannot be doubted.”); Aurora Nat’l Bank v. Dils, 48 N.E. 19, 21 (Ind. Ct. App. 1897) (“The indorsement of a check is a distinct contract.”); Byrd Printing Co. v. Whitaker Paper Co., 70 S.E. 798, 800 (Ga. 1911) (“A check is a contract[.]”); Deal v. Atl. | 1 | 1 |
American Emigrant Co. v. Clarkgreen1 sentence2025Emigrant Co. v. Clark, 47 Iowa 671, 674 (1878) (“Regarding the check as a contract complete in itself, which, as all other commercial paper, it is, the correctness of this instruction cannot be doubted.”); Aurora Nat’l Bank v. Dils, 48 N.E. 19, 21 (Ind. Ct. App. 1897) (“The indorsement of a check is a distinct contract.”); Byrd Printing Co. v. Whitaker Paper Co., 70 S.E. 798, 800 (Ga. 1911) (“A check is a contract[.]”); Deal v. Atl. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pautsch v. Maryland Real Estate Commission
green
2 sentences2015Op. at 595, 117 A.3d at 1107 (quoting Pautsch, 423 Md. at 263 , 31 A.3d at 509 ), necessarily depends on the correctness of its analysis that CP § 8-401 is procedural and remedial. 2015Op. at 595, 117 A.3d at 1107 (quoting Pautsch, 423 Md. at 263 , 31 A.3d at 509 ), necessarily depends on the correctness of its analysis that CP § 8-401 is procedural and remedial. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Noble v. State
green
1 sentence1998If present he may ‘have produced an impression upon the jury favorable to himself.’ ” Id., quoting Maurer v. The People, 43 N.Y. 1, 5 (1870). | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Erdman v. State
green
2 sentences1989We agree with the Court of Special Appeals that “[i]n the circumstances of this case, the proposed instruction appears to be a correct summary of what would have happened to Erdman if he had been found not criminally responsible---The issue, then, is not the correctness of the instruction but *52 its relevance.” Erdman v. State, 75 Md.App. at 563 , 542 A.2d 399 . 1989We agree with the Court of Special Appeals that “[i]n the circumstances of this case, the proposed instruction appears to be a correct summary of what would have happened to Erdman if he had been found not criminally responsible---The issue, then, is not the correctness of the instruction but *52 its relevance.” Erdman v. State, 75 Md.App. at 563 , 542 A.2d 399 . | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Gaybis v. Palm
green
1 sentence1955Cf. Gaybis v. Palm, 201 Md. 78, 83 . | 1 | 1955–1955 |
Hoffhines v. Hoffhines
green
1 sentence1927Outlaw v. Outlaw, 118 Md. 502 ; Hood v. Hood, 138 Md. 360 ; Polley v. Polley, 128 Md. 63 ; Hoffhines v. Hoffhines, 146 Md. 350 .” The correctness of the rule as above stated is not questioned by the appellant; his contention being that the hill in this case is insufficient as a basis for a decree for divorce either a vinculo matrimonii or a mensa et thoro. | 1 | 1927–1927 |
Summers v. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co.
green
1 sentence1921At no time between May and September, 1899, was the appellee bound in disregard of these promises of a postponed performance to go upon the market and by a purchase fix the amount of his loss and consequent damage.” In Summers v. Hibbard, 153 Ill. 102 , it is said: “There is no doubt of the correctness of the rule stated by the appellants, that where delivery is required to be made by installments, the measure of damages will be estimated by the *504 value at the time each delivery should be made. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Crampton v. Perkins
neutral
1 sentence1896Through a series of cases, beginning with Totten v. Bucy, 57 Md. 452 , and followed by Crampton v. Perkins, 65 Md. 22 ; Williams v. Huntington, 68 Md. 590 ; Griffith v. Shipley, 74 Md. 591 ; Cover v. Myers, 75 Md. 406 , and Banks v. McCosker and Molloy, 82 Md. 518 ; the law of Maryland on this subject has been consistently declared. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Williams v. Huntington
neutral
1 sentence1896Through a series of cases, beginning with Totten v. Bucy, 57 Md. 452 , and followed by Crampton v. Perkins, 65 Md. 22 ; Williams v. Huntington, 68 Md. 590 ; Griffith v. Shipley, 74 Md. 591 ; Cover v. Myers, 75 Md. 406 , and Banks v. McCosker and Molloy, 82 Md. 518 ; the law of Maryland on this subject has been consistently declared. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Griffith v. Shipley
neutral
1 sentence1896Through a series of cases, beginning with Totten v. Bucy, 57 Md. 452 , and followed by Crampton v. Perkins, 65 Md. 22 ; Williams v. Huntington, 68 Md. 590 ; Griffith v. Shipley, 74 Md. 591 ; Cover v. Myers, 75 Md. 406 , and Banks v. McCosker and Molloy, 82 Md. 518 ; the law of Maryland on this subject has been consistently declared. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Cover v. Myers
neutral
1 sentence1896Through a series of cases, beginning with Totten v. Bucy, 57 Md. 452 , and followed by Crampton v. Perkins, 65 Md. 22 ; Williams v. Huntington, 68 Md. 590 ; Griffith v. Shipley, 74 Md. 591 ; Cover v. Myers, 75 Md. 406 , and Banks v. McCosker and Molloy, 82 Md. 518 ; the law of Maryland on this subject has been consistently declared. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Banks v. McCosker & Molloy
green
1 sentence1896Through a series of cases, beginning with Totten v. Bucy, 57 Md. 452 , and followed by Crampton v. Perkins, 65 Md. 22 ; Williams v. Huntington, 68 Md. 590 ; Griffith v. Shipley, 74 Md. 591 ; Cover v. Myers, 75 Md. 406 , and Banks v. McCosker and Molloy, 82 Md. 518 ; the law of Maryland on this subject has been consistently declared. | 1 | 1896–1896 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.