9 Minnesota opinions name it 2 courts 1902–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Minnesota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sigfrinius v. Commissioner of Public Safetygreen2 sentences2015Safety, 378 N.W.2d 124, 127 (Minn. App. 1985) (concluding that a driver’s act of putting a breath mint in his mouth constituted a refusal to test when he was advised several times to remove it, and the district court found that his actions were calculated to avoid license suspension). 2000Safety, 378 N.W.2d 124 (Minn.App.1985) (driver’s actions constituted a refusal to test, in case where driver put breath mint in his mouth and was advised five to six times to remove it, and trial court found driver’s actions were calculated to avoid suspension of license). 2 Based on these facts, we conclude that the district court properly found that Busch’s behavior frustrated the implied consent process and amounted to a retraction of his request for an attorney and a refusal to submit to testing. 3 DECISION Because Busch’s behavior during the reading of the implied consent advisory frustra | 1 | 2 |
State v. Barsnessgreen1 sentence2010Safety, 473 N.W.2d 828, 835 (Minn.1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Abegreen2 sentences1990Id.; see also State v. Abe, 289 N.W.2d 158 (Minn.1980). 1990Id.; see also State v. Abe, 289 N.W.2d 158 (Minn.1980). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Salasgreen1 sentence1987State v. Salas, 306 N.W.2d 832, 835 (Minn.1981). | 1 | 1 |
Dietrich v. Commissioner of Public Safetygreen1 sentence1986Erickson argues the Commissioner of Public Safety has not established that there was probable cause to arrest her for violation of the DWI statute and that the Commissioner failed to establish the “necessary temporal connection” between her driving and her alleged intoxication as required by Dietrich v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 363 N.W.2d 801, 803 (Minn.Ct.App.1985). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Minnesota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Rita Ann Stevens v. Commissioner of Public Safety
green
1 sentence2015And “[i]f a driver expresses verbal agreement to submit to chemical testing but does not provide an adequate sample, his or her conduct may be deemed a refusal to submit to chemical testing.” Stevens, 850 N.W.2d at 721 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Gross
green
2 sentences1991Gross, 335 N.W.2d at 510 n. 1. 1991Gross, 335 N.W.2d at 510 n. 1. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Upton
green
2 sentences1984The court’s refusal to bar use of the prior conviction is supported by numerous decisions of this court, particularly State v. Upton, 306 N.W.2d 117 , 118 *561 (Minn.1981) (allowing use of a third-degree murder eonviction to impeach the credibility of a defendant charged with assault with a dangerous weapon). 1984The court’s refusal to bar use of the prior conviction is supported by numerous decisions of this court, particularly State v. Upton, 306 N.W.2d 117 , 118 *561 (Minn.1981) (allowing use of a third-degree murder eonviction to impeach the credibility of a defendant charged with assault with a dangerous weapon). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Brandenburger v. Jefferson Club Ass'n
neutral
1 sentence1902For the refusal is a violation of its rules, which the member has agreed to obey.” See also Brandenburger v. Jefferson, 88 Mo. App. 148 . | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.