5 Vermont opinions name it 1 courts 1884–1990 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Vermont courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Pfeil v. Rutland District Courtgreen2 sentences1989See Lynaugh, 148 Vt. at 126 , 530 A.2d at 557 ; Pfeil v. Rutland District Court, 147 Vt. 305, 307 , 515 A.2d 1052, 1054 (1986). 1989See Lynaugh, 148 Vt. at 126 , 530 A.2d at 557 ; Pfeil v. Rutland District Court, 147 Vt. 305, 307 , 515 A.2d 1052, 1054 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Lynaughgreen2 sentences1989See State v. Lynaugh, 148 Vt. at 126, 530 A.2d at 557 . 1989See State v. Lynaugh, 148 Vt. at 126, 530 A.2d at 557 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Vermont. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Shaw v. VERMONT DIST. COURT, UNIT NO. 3
green
2 sentences1990Shaw held that an operator’s license may be suspended for failure to submit to a breath test, id. at 4-5 , 563 A.2d at 638 ; that a jury trial is not constitutionally required at a refusal hearing, id. at 6-7 , 563 A.2d at 640 ; and that the preponderance of the evidence standard is correctly used at a refusal hearing, id. at 6 , 563 A.2d at 639 . 1990Shaw held that an operator’s license may be suspended for failure to submit to a breath test, id. at 4-5 , 563 A.2d at 638 ; that a jury trial is not constitutionally required at a refusal hearing, id. at 6-7 , 563 A.2d at 640 ; and that the preponderance of the evidence standard is correctly used at a refusal hearing, id. at 6 , 563 A.2d at 639 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Hopt v. Utah
green
2 sentences1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . 1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
State v. Hooper
green
2 sentences1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . 1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
People v. Barker
green
2 sentences1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . 1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
State v. Sultan.
green
2 sentences1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . 1968See also: Hopt v. Utah, 120 U.S. 430 , 7 S.Ct. 614 , 30 L.Ed. 708, 710 ; State v. Hooper, 140 Kan. 481 , 37 P.2d 52, 64 ; People v. Barker, 60 Mich. 277 , 27 N.W. 539, 542 ; State v. Sultan, 142 N.C. 569 , 54 S.E. 841, 843 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
State v. Kamuda
green
2 sentences1968The court held at page 453 that the respondent Field “was not injured by the refusal of his challenge for cause, as he peremptorily challenged the juror and had challenges left when the panel was filled.” Cf. State v. Kamuda, 98 Vt. 466 , 129 A. 306 . 1968The court held at page 453 that the respondent Field “was not injured by the refusal of his challenge for cause, as he peremptorily challenged the juror and had challenges left when the panel was filled.” Cf. State v. Kamuda, 98 Vt. 466 , 129 A. 306 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Foster's Exrs. v. Dickerson
neutral
1 sentence1894Fosters Exr. v. Dickerson, 64 Vt. 233 , and cases there cited. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Burrell v. State
green
1 sentence1884State v. Dodson, 16 S. C. 453; Burrell v. The State, 18 Tex. 713 ; 3 Whart. | 1 | 1884–1884 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.