11 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1921–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Halen v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 834 , 41 P.3d 257, 262 (2002) (“Motorists who refuse to submit to requested tests are entitled to have their licenses reinstated if they can establish at the refusal hearing that they were not completely advised . . . .”). 2020See Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 834 , 41 P.3d 257, 262 (2002) (“Motorists who refuse to submit to requested tests are entitled to have their licenses reinstated if they can establish at the refusal hearing that they were not completely advised . . . .”). | 4 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Griffiths
green
2 sentences2002Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 . 2002Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 . | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Moore v. Kujath
green
2 sentences1960In the case of Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N.W.2d 883 , 175 A.L.R. 1007 , the plaintiff Moore approached the intersection, where the collision occurred, from the north. 1960In the case of Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N.W.2d 883 , 175 A.L.R. 1007 , the plaintiff Moore approached the intersection, where the collision occurred, from the north. | 1 | 1960–1960 |
Speck v. Sarver
green
2 sentences1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . 1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Graham v. Milsap
green
2 sentences1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . 1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Cole v. Ridings
green
2 sentences1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . 1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Campbell v. City of Los Angeles
green
2 sentences1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . 1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Brandelius v. City & County of San Francisco
green
2 sentences1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . 1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
Koch v. Elkins
green
2 sentences1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . 1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 . | 1 | 1959–1959 |
State v. Farnsworth
green
2 sentences1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R. 1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
State v. Boyles
neutral
2 sentences1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R. 1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R. | 1 | 1958–1958 |
State v. Ayres
green
2 sentences1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. 1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Alvord
green
2 sentences1953State v. Alvord, 47 Idaho 162 , 272 P. 1010 . 1953State v. Alvord, 47 Idaho 162 , 272 P. 1010 . | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Rutten
green
2 sentences1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. 1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Newman
green
2 sentences1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. 1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
State v. Scott
green
2 sentences1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. 1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Plummer v. State
green
1 sentence1921(Plummer v. State, 111 Ga. 839 , 36 S. E. 233 ; Merriweather v. Sayre Min. & Mfg. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Clay v. Macon & Birmingham Railroad
green
1 sentence1921(Plummer v. State, 111 Ga. 839 , 36 S. E. 233 ; Merriweather v. Sayre Min. & Mfg. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.