refusal instruction (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

refusal instruction in Idaho

11 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1921–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Halen v. Stategreen
idaho · 2002 · cited in 4 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 2010–2020
2 sentences

2020See Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 834 , 41 P.3d 257, 262 (2002) (“Motorists who refuse to submit to requested tests are entitled to have their licenses reinstated if they can establish at the refusal hearing that they were not completely advised . . . .”).

2020See Halen v. State, 136 Idaho 829, 834 , 41 P.3d 257, 262 (2002) (“Motorists who refuse to submit to requested tests are entitled to have their licenses reinstated if they can establish at the refusal hearing that they were not completely advised . . . .”).

44

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (17)

CaseCitedYears
Matter of Griffiths green
idaho · 1987
2 sentences

2002Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 .

2002Griffiths, 113 Idaho at 370 , 744 P.2d at 98 .

12002–2002
Moore v. Kujath green
minn · 1947
2 sentences

1960In the case of Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N.W.2d 883 , 175 A.L.R. 1007 , the plaintiff Moore approached the intersection, where the collision occurred, from the north.

1960In the case of Moore v. Kujath, 225 Minn. 107 , 29 N.W.2d 883 , 175 A.L.R. 1007 , the plaintiff Moore approached the intersection, where the collision occurred, from the north.

11960–1960
Speck v. Sarver green
cal · 1942
2 sentences

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

11959–1959
Graham v. Milsap green
idaho · 1955
2 sentences

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

11959–1959
Cole v. Ridings green
calctapp · 1949
2 sentences

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

11959–1959
Campbell v. City of Los Angeles green
calctapp · 1938
2 sentences

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

11959–1959
Brandelius v. City & County of San Francisco green
cal · 1957
2 sentences

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

11959–1959
Koch v. Elkins green
idaho · 1950
2 sentences

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

1959Koch v. Elkins, 71 Idaho 50 , 225 P.2d 457 ; Graham v. Milsap, 77 Idaho 179 , 290 P.2d 744 ; Campbell v. City of Los Angeles, 28 Cal.App.2d 490 , 82 P.2d 720 ; Speck v. Sarver, 20 Cal.2d 585 , 128 P.2d 16 ; Cole v. Ridings, 95 Cal. App.2d 136 , 212 P.2d 597 ; Brandelius v. City and County of San Francisco, 47 Cal. 2d 729 , 306 P.2d 432 .

11959–1959
State v. Farnsworth green
· 1932
2 sentences

1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R.

1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R.

11958–1958
State v. Boyles neutral
idaho · 1921
2 sentences

1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R.

1958State v. Boyles, 34 Idaho 283 , 200 P. 125 ; State v. Farnsworth, 51 Idaho 768 , 10 P.2d 295 ; Judd v. Oregon Short Line R.

11958–1958
State v. Ayres green
idaho · 1949
2 sentences

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

11953–1953
State v. Alvord green
idaho · 1928
2 sentences

1953State v. Alvord, 47 Idaho 162 , 272 P. 1010 .

1953State v. Alvord, 47 Idaho 162 , 272 P. 1010 .

11953–1953
State v. Rutten green
idaho · 1952
2 sentences

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

11953–1953
State v. Newman green
idaho · 1950
2 sentences

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

11953–1953
State v. Scott green
idaho · 1951
2 sentences

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

1953State v. Ayres, 70 Idaho 18 , 211 P.2d 142 ; State v. Newman, 70 Idaho 184 , 214 P.2d 159 ; State v. Scott, 72 Idaho 202 , 239 P.2d 258 ; State v. Rutten, 73 Idaho 25 , 245 P.2d 778 , Judgment affirmed.

11953–1953
Plummer v. State green
ga · 1900
1 sentence

1921(Plummer v. State, 111 Ga. 839 , 36 S. E. 233 ; Merriweather v. Sayre Min. & Mfg.

11921–1921
Clay v. Macon & Birmingham Railroad green
ga · 1900
1 sentence

1921(Plummer v. State, 111 Ga. 839 , 36 S. E. 233 ; Merriweather v. Sayre Min. & Mfg.

11921–1921

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 18-8002 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 18-8004 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 18-8002A (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 342 (1874–2026) CA 118 (1867–2024) IL 104 (1885–2026) MO 64 (1886–2014) IN 55 (1875–2014) WI 52 (1932–2025) MA 51 (1870–2025) NY 49 (1871–2025) MS 48 (1889–2024) PA 34 (1849–2026) VA 25 (1912–2026) AL 24 (1895–2007) WV 24 (1896–2021) OH 23 (1889–2024) NM 22 (1910–2023) GA 19 (1882–2024) CO 15 (1922–2026) FL 14 (1913–2014) NE 13 (1893–2024) IA 12 (1897–2021) KS 12 (1892–1996) AR 11 (1914–2020) ID 11 (1921–2020) AZ 10 (1966–2021) OK 10 (1911–2008) MD 9 (1963–2010) NV 9 (1887–2013) MN 9 (1902–2015) NJ 8 (1964–2020) WY 8 (1952–2020) WA 8 (1917–2000) ME 8 (1926–2019) KY 7 (1916–2024) NC 7 (1947–2019) OR 7 (1885–2015) ND 6 (1960–2007) UT 6 (1968–2026) SD 5 (1925–2014) VT 5 (1884–1990) LA 4 (1969–2006) MT 4 (1935–2016) NH 4 (1974–1997) HI 4 (1945–1999) DC 4 (1989–2025) CT 4 (1975–2018) MI 3 (1927–1978) TN 3 (1935–2013) SC 3 (1988–2024) RI 3 (1970–1987) AK 2 (1978–1981)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check