refusal instruction (Nevada) · Go Syfert
← Nevada issues

refusal instruction in Nevada

9 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1887–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (9)

CaseFollowedCited
Board of Gallery of History, Inc. v. Datecs Corp.green
nev · 2000 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
1 sentence

2011Bd. of Gallery of History v. Datecs Corp., 116 Nev. 286 , 289, 994 P.2d 1149, 1150 (2000) (noting that the district court’s failure to rule on a request for attorney fees constitutes a denial of the request); Weiler v. Ross, 80 Nev. 380, 382 , 395 P.2d 323, 324 (1964) (noting that the effect of a district court’s refusal to rule upon a motion to amend the complaint was to deny the motion).

11
Weiler v. Rossgreen
nev · 1964 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011
2 sentences

2011Bd. of Gallery of History v. Datecs Corp., 116 Nev. 286 , 289, 994 P.2d 1149, 1150 (2000) (noting that the district court’s failure to rule on a request for attorney fees constitutes a denial of the request); Weiler v. Ross, 80 Nev. 380, 382 , 395 P.2d 323, 324 (1964) (noting that the effect of a district court’s refusal to rule upon a motion to amend the complaint was to deny the motion).

2011Bd. of Gallery of History v. Datecs Corp., 116 Nev. 286 , 289, 994 P.2d 1149, 1150 (2000) (noting that the district court’s failure to rule on a request for attorney fees constitutes a denial of the request); Weiler v. Ross, 80 Nev. 380, 382 , 395 P.2d 323, 324 (1964) (noting that the effect of a district court’s refusal to rule upon a motion to amend the complaint was to deny the motion).

11
Allen v. Stategreen
nev · 1981 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

11
Ex-Parte Curnowgreen
· 1890 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

11
State v. Mooregreen
nev · 1925 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

11
State v. Oschoagreen
nev · 1926 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

11
Walker v. Stategreen
nev · 1994 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

11
Parsons v. Stategreen
nev · 1958 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

11
Wegner v. Stategreen
nev · 2000 · cited in 1 Nevada opinions naming this issue, 2006–2006
2 sentences

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

2006See Walker, 110 Nev. at 574 , 876 P.2d at 647-48 ; Wegner v. State, 116 Nev. 1149, 1156 , 14 P.3d 25, 30 (2000) (citing Walker ). [28] Allen v. State, 97 Nev. 394, 398 , 632 P.2d 1153, 1155 (1981) (emphases added) (citations omitted); see also State v. Moore, 48 Nev. 405, 415 , 233 P. 523, 526 (1925) ("If appellant had introduced any evidence or any had otherwise appeared tending to [support the defense theory], the refusal of the instruction requested would have been error. . . . "). [29] See Parsons v. State, 74 Nev. 302, 307-09 , 329 P.2d 1070, 1073-74 (1958); State v. Oschoa, 49 Nev. 194,

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Huneycutt v. Huneycutt green
nev · 1978
2 sentences

2013Huneycutt v. Huneycutt, 94 Nev. 79 , 575 P.2d 585 (1978).

2013Huneycutt v. Huneycutt, 94 Nev. 79 , 575 P.2d 585 (1978).

12013–2013
State v. Sheeley green
nev · 1945
2 sentences

1975Without such right a refusal is not error.” See also, State v. Sheeley, 63 Nev. 88 , 162 P.2d 96 (1945).

1975Without such right a refusal is not error.” See also, State v. Sheeley, 63 Nev. 88 , 162 P.2d 96 (1945).

11975–1975
Beasley v. State green
nev · 1965
2 sentences

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

11967–1967
Cranford v. State green
nev · 1960
2 sentences

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

11967–1967
Kuk v. State green
nev · 1964
2 sentences

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

11967–1967
Cook v. State green
nev · 1961
2 sentences

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

1967Cranford v. State, 76 Nev. 113 , 349 P.2d 1051 (1960); Cook v. State, 77 Nev. 83 , 359 P.2d 483 (1961); Kuk v. State, 80 Nev. 291 , 392 P.2d 630 (1964); Beasley v. State, 81 Nev. 431 , 404 P.2d 911 (1965).

11967–1967
Hewel v. Hogin green
calctapp · 1906
2 sentences

1964The effect of the lower court’s refusal to rule upon the motion to amend was to deny the motion (Hewel v. Hogin, 3 Cal.App. 248 , 84 P. 1002 ), and for the purposes of this appeal we shall treat that motion as though it was denied.

1964The effect of the lower court’s refusal to rule upon the motion to amend was to deny the motion (Hewel v. Hogin, 3 Cal.App. 248 , 84 P. 1002 ), and for the purposes of this appeal we shall treat that motion as though it was denied.

11964–1964
Gylling v. Kjergaard neutral
ca8 · 1923
1 sentence

1961Miller and her husband conveyed the property and their right of homestead therein to the trustee and beneficiary and, in equity, each of them should be compelled to do everything necessary to make that conveyance, effective.” In *475 support, they cite Gylling v. Kjergaard, 8 Cir., 293 F. 676 , holding that mortgagees have the same right to enforce for their benefit every right the mortgagor had in the property which, by his selection he had the lawful power to render exempt by selecting and claiming such exemption, and that in the event of the mortgagor’s refusal to claim such exemption it wo

11961–1961
State v. Fisko green
nev · 1937
2 sentences

1945State v. Fisko, 58 Nev. 65 , 70 P. 2d 1113 ; State v. Maioni, 78 N. J.

1945State v. Fisko, 58 Nev. 65 , 70 P. 2d 1113 ; State v. Maioni, 78 N. J.

11945–1945
Cummins v. James neutral
ark · 1842
1 sentence

1887In Cummins v. James, 4 Ark. 616 , the.trial court refused the .following'.instruction: “ If the jury believe from the evidence that the .legal right to the money in controversy is in the bank <of-.the United States,they roust find'for the defendants”; and “unless .the jury believe from the evidence that the plaintiffs are legally the assignees of the bank, they must find for the 'defendants,” Said the court: “The principle is'unquestionably true that a.party, to maintain an aption, must be entitled to the legal interest in the suit.

11887–1887

Where else courts name it

TX 342 (1874–2026) CA 118 (1867–2024) IL 104 (1885–2026) MO 64 (1886–2014) IN 55 (1875–2014) WI 52 (1932–2025) MA 51 (1870–2025) NY 49 (1871–2025) MS 48 (1889–2024) PA 34 (1849–2026) VA 25 (1912–2026) AL 24 (1895–2007) WV 24 (1896–2021) OH 23 (1889–2024) NM 22 (1910–2023) GA 19 (1882–2024) CO 15 (1922–2026) FL 14 (1913–2014) NE 13 (1893–2024) IA 12 (1897–2021) KS 12 (1892–1996) AR 11 (1914–2020) ID 11 (1921–2020) AZ 10 (1966–2021) OK 10 (1911–2008) MD 9 (1963–2010) NV 9 (1887–2013) MN 9 (1902–2015) NJ 8 (1964–2020) WY 8 (1952–2020) WA 8 (1917–2000) ME 8 (1926–2019) KY 7 (1916–2024) NC 7 (1947–2019) OR 7 (1885–2015) ND 6 (1960–2007) UT 6 (1968–2026) SD 5 (1925–2014) VT 5 (1884–1990) LA 4 (1969–2006) MT 4 (1935–2016) NH 4 (1974–1997) HI 4 (1945–1999) DC 4 (1989–2025) CT 4 (1975–2018) MI 3 (1927–1978) TN 3 (1935–2013) SC 3 (1988–2024) RI 3 (1970–1987) AK 2 (1978–1981)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check